IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i12d10.1007_s10668-024-04941-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental policy stringency and carbon leakages: a case for carbon border adjustment mechanism in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Godwin Olasehinde-Williams

    (Istanbul Ticaret University, Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Business
    Azerbaijan State University of Economics, Nizami Gajanvi Research Center of Sustainable Development & Green Economy)

  • Seyi Saint Akadiri

    (European University of Lefke, Advanced Research Center
    Central Bank of Nigeria, Research Department)

Abstract

This study examines the link between the strictness of environmental policies and carbon leakage in the European Union (EU). It utilizes an econometric model to analyse how carbon leakage is influenced by environmental policies and other factors. A comprehensive dataset spanning from 1995 to 2020 for 20 EU member nations is employed. This study is ground-breaking, as it is the first to comprehensively assess the effect of aggregated environmental policies on carbon leakages in the EU. This study employs a range of econometric techniques to ensure the reliability of its findings, including the continuously updated fully modified approach, bias-adjusted ordinary least squares method, and bootstrap panel causality testing. The findings confirm that stringent environmental policies cause greater carbon leakage by increasing the quantity of foreign carbon emissions embodied in EU’s domestic final demand. Specifically, carbon leakage increases within the range 0.051–0.111% as environmental policy stringency rises by 1%. This outcome confirms that direct carbon leakage occurs through the international trade channel as domestic carbon emissions reduction is continuously being offset by greater emissions abroad. Country-specific reactions captured through causality tests further reveal that the predictive powers between environmental policy stringency and carbon leakage is widespread among the sampled EU countries. Thus, our conclusion is that stringent environmental policies put the region at a disadvantage in the international markets. The main recommendation therefore is that ample justification exists for the introduction of carbon border adjustment mechanism, as the positives associated with its imposition are likely to outweigh the negatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Godwin Olasehinde-Williams & Seyi Saint Akadiri, 2025. "Environmental policy stringency and carbon leakages: a case for carbon border adjustment mechanism in the European Union," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 30817-30838, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04941-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04941-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04941-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04941-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04941-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.