IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Solving MPSGE Models Using GEMPACK

Author

Listed:
  • Cretegny, Laurent
  • Horridge, Mark
  • Pearson, Ken
  • Rutherford, Thomas

Abstract

MPSGE is a non-algebraic language for the formulation of applied general equilibrium models. When you build a model using MPSGE you do not need to specify equations, but you instead work with a tabular representation of the model. The input tables make reference to source statistics, typically drawn from a single benchmark year. MPSGE input data describing your model characterize technology, preferences, tax rates, and factor endowments. These data, together with a set of equilibrium conditions, defines the equilibrium framework. MPSGE is a framework designed primarily to permit rapid prototyping of applied models. The compact, non-algebraic format can substantially improve productivity through the automated generation of demand and supply functions. This approach reduces the scope for errors and simplifies sensitivity analysis of results with respect to model structure. To take advantage of the MPSGE framework, a user must learn the syntax and conventions of the MPSGE language. The purpose of this paper is to introduce and document a new program (called MGE2GP) that can be used to convert MPSGE representations of models to GEMPACK. If you write down a model in MPSGE form, and create a data file for the model, you can use this program to convert your model to GEMPACK and then use GEMPACK software to solve the model. This paper contains detailed instructions for carrying out these steps. The paper contains a self-contained introduction to the MPSGE language, illustrated via several example models. The full version of the paper will contain detailed hands-on instructions for solving these example models using GEMPACK. The aim is to make the paper accessible to all general equilibrium modellers. In particular, we do not assume that readers are already familiar with MPSGE or GEMPACK. The example models can be solved using the Demonstration Version of GEMPACK which can be downloaded (at no cost) from the web.

Suggested Citation

  • Cretegny, Laurent & Horridge, Mark & Pearson, Ken & Rutherford, Thomas, 2004. "Solving MPSGE Models Using GEMPACK," Conference papers 331202, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331202/files/1513.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henning Tarp Jensen & Finn Tarp, 2002. "CGE Modelling and Trade Policy: Reassessing The Agricultural Bias," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 383-405, July.
    2. Elbehri, Aziz & Pearson, Ken, 2000. "Implementing Bilateral Tariff Rate Quotas In Gtap Using Gempack," Technical Papers 28715, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Arndt, Channing & Tarp, Finn, 2000. "Agricultural Technology, Risk, and Gender: A CGE Analysis of Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1307-1326, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Channing Arndt & Finn Tarp, 2004. "On Trade Policy Reform and the Missing Revenue: an Application to Mozambique," Discussion Papers 04-19, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    2. Arndt, Channing & Tarp, Finn, 2003. "Trade Policy Reform and the Missing Revenue: A Gendered Analysis for Mozambique," MPRA Paper 62441, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kumhof, Michael & Laxton, Doug & Naknoi, Kanda, 2005. "On the Benefits of Exchange Rate Flexibility under Endogenous Tradedness of Goods," Conference papers 331319, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Channing Arndt & Sherman Robinson & Finn Tarp, 2006. "Trade Reform and Gender in Mozambique," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 32, pages 73-89.
    5. Muryani, 2014. "The Impact of Bird Flu on the Economy: CGE Model Approach (Computable General Equilibrium Model)," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(8), pages 1062-1078, August.
    6. Arndt, Channing & Benfica, Rui & Thurlow, James, 2011. "Gender Implications of Biofuels Expansion in Africa: The Case of Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1649-1662, September.
    7. Henning Tarp Jensen & Sherman Robinson & Finn Tarp, 2010. "Measuring Agricultural Policy Bias: General Equilibrium Analysis of Fifteen Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1136-1148.
    8. Bai, Yunli & Zeng, Xuanye & Zhang, Linxiu & Song, Yiching & Zeng, Xuanye, 2021. "Domestic decision-making, crop diversity, and household dietary diversity: Evidence from five developing countries in Asia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315393, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Heboyan, Vahe & Ames, Glenn C.W. & Gunter, Lewell F. & Houston, Jack E., 2001. "U.S. - Mexico Sugar Dispute: Impact Of Nafta On The Sugar Market," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20730, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Gannon, Kate & Castellano, Elena & Eskander, Shaikh & Agol, Dorice & Diop, Mamadou & Conway, Declan & Sprout, Liz, 2022. "The triple differential vulnerability of female entrepreneurs to climate risk in sub-Saharan Africa: gendered barriers and enablers to private sector adaptation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115222, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Hopkins, Jeffrey W. & Morehart, Mitchell & Bohman, Mary, 2002. "Analyzing Direct Payments to U.S. Farm Households: Addressing the 'Distribution Gap'," Conference papers 331031, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Alekseev, Alexander & Sokolov, Denis & Tourdyeva, Natalia & Yudaeva, Ksenia, 2004. "Estimating the effects of EU enlargement, WTO accession and formation of FTA with EU or CIS on Russian economy," Conference papers 331218, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Patrice Rélouendé Zidouemba & Romuald Somlanare Kinda & Pouirkèta Rita Nikiema, 2024. "Impacts of agricultural capital subsidies for women in Burkina Faso: Lessons from a Computable General Equilibrium model," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 205-230, January.
    14. Latorre, Maria C., 2014. "CGE analysis of the impact of foreign direct investment and tariff reform on female and male wages," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7073, The World Bank.
    15. Brockmeier, Martina & Sommer, Ulrich & Thomsen, Karin, 2005. "Sugar Policies: An Invincible Bastion for Modelers?," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232588, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Tarp, Finn & Arndt, Channing & Jensen, Henning Tarp & Robinson, Sherman & Heltberg, Rasmus, 2002. "Facing the development challenge in Mozambique: an economywide perspective," Research reports 126, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Dominique van der Mensbrugghe & John C. Beghin & Don Mitchell, 2003. "Modeling Tariff Rate Quotas in a Global Context: The Case of Sugar Markets in OECD Countries," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 03-wp343, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    18. Rae, Allan N., 2001. "Trade In Livestock Products And The Wto Millenium Round: Projections To 2005 And Problems With Trq'S," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14564, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    19. Markus Lips & Peter Rieder, 2004. "Potential Impact of the WTO Doha Round on Swiss Agriculture," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 140(IV), pages 569-583, December.
    20. Heboyan, Vahe & Ames, Glenn C.W. & Gunter, Lewell F. & Houston, Jack E., 2001. "U.S.-Mexico Sugar Dispute: Impact Of Nafta On The Sugar Market," Faculty Series 16695, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.