IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/inpora/294666.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agency Theory and the Chinese Enterprise • Under Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Cauley, Jon
  • Sandler, Todd

Abstract

This paper investigates structural wage reform pertaining to medium and large state-owned enterprises, within the context of the 1988 Enterprise Law. Evidence exists that this reform package failed to achieve its full potential. A primary purpose of the paper is to analyze this • failure with the aid of principal-agent analysis, in which the manager is the principal and the workers are the agents. The analysis suggests that the reforms performed poorly since the workers' incentive problem was not adequately addressed. Much of the bonuses became fixed wage supplements, not tied to the output or profit of the enterprise. Moreover, freeriding incentives among workers were not adequately addressed. Multilevel concerns and the • formation of coalitions among workers and supervisors are also analyzed. Means for making the reforms more effective are suggested. For example, rule governance can dilute collusion.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:inpora:294666
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.294666
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/294666/files/ipr019.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.294666?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inpora:294666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.