IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional Design for Financial Intermediation by NGOs: Implications for Indigenous Self-Help Village Groups in the Gambia


  • Nagarajan, Geetha
  • Meyer, Richard L.
  • Graham, Douglas H.


This paper examines the implications of the institutional designs employed by two types of NGOs for the functions performed by indigenous self-help village groups called kafos in The Gambia. NGOs were found to be only a partial substitute for the financial and insurance functions traditionally performed by these kafos. Institutional duality is, therefore, observed due to the coexistence of kafos alongside the NGOs providing the multiple services demanded by villagers. The design of NGO programs based on lessons learned from kafos tend to complement the kafos, and the villagers seem better served. These findings have implications for interventions which disrupt but only partially substitute for traditional village arrangements and institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagarajan, Geetha & Meyer, Richard L. & Graham, Douglas H., 1997. "Institutional Design for Financial Intermediation by NGOs: Implications for Indigenous Self-Help Village Groups in the Gambia," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198187, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo7:198187
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.198187

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Arnott, Richard & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1991. "Moral Hazard and Nonmarket Institutions: Dysfunctional Crowding Out or Peer Monitoring?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(1), pages 179-190, March.
    2. Huppi, Monika & Feder, Gershon, 1990. "The Role of Groups and Credit Cooperatives in Rural Lending," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 5(2), pages 187-204, July.
    3. Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1990. "Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 4(3), pages 351-366, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo7:198187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.