IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hebarc/18607.html

Acreage Allocation Model Estimation and Policy Evaluations for Major Crops in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Koc, A. Ali

Abstract

This study estimates a system of supply equations for major field crops in Turkey and evaluates alternative agricultural policies for crop supply control. The supply of major field crops in Turkey responds significantly to both own-price and substitute price changes. The Turkish wheat price or gross return is the most important factor determining area allocation in Turkish field crops. Moreover, adopting measures that improve the growth of wheat yields also affect the substitute crops supply unless the price or gross return ratio is readjusted between substitute crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Koc, A. Ali, 1999. "Acreage Allocation Model Estimation and Policy Evaluations for Major Crops in Turkey," Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive 18607, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18607
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18607/files/wp990220.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Ali Koc & Darnell B. Smith & Frank H. Fuller, 1998. "Turkish Agricultural Policy Analysis Model, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 98-tr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Barten, Anton P. & Vanloot, Chris, 1996. "Price dynamics in agriculture: An exercise in historical econometrics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 315-331, July.
    3. A. Ali Koc & Darnell B. Smith & Frank H. Fuller, 1998. "Turkish Agricultural Policy Analysis Model, The," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 98-tr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Just, Richard E., 1993. "Discovering Production and Supply Relationships: Present Status and Future Opportunities," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(01), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Koc, A. Ali & Smith, Darnell B. & Fuller, Frank H. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F., 1998. "The Turkish Agricultural Policy Analysis Model," CARD Technical Report Series 18643, Iowa State University, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Ali Koc, 1999. "Acreage Allocation Model Estimation and Policy Evaluations for Major Crops in Turkey," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-wp220, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Grethe, Harald, 2004. "What Can Turkey Gain From Full Agricultural Market Integration With The Eu Without Being A Member?," Working Papers 14604, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    3. A. Ali Koc, 1999. "Acreage Allocation Model Estimation and Policy Evaluations for Major Crops in Turkey," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 99-wp220, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Torre Ugarte, Daniel de la & Sanford, Scott & Skinner, Robert A. & Westcott, Paul C. & Lin, William W., 2000. "Supply Response Under The 1996 Farm Act And Implications For The U.S. Field Crops Sector," Technical Bulletins 33568, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Vavra, Pavel & Colman, David, 2003. "The analysis of UK crop allocation at the farm level: implications for supply response analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 697-713, May.
    6. A. P. Moxey & B. White & R. A. Sanderson & S. P. Rushton, 1995. "An Approach To Linking An Ecological Vegetation Model To An Agricultural Economic Model," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 381-397, September.
    7. Sunil KANWAR & Elisabeth SADOULET, 2008. "Dynamic Output Response Revisited: The Indian Cash Crops," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 46(3), pages 217-241, September.
    8. Sunil Kanwar, 2004. "Price Incentives, Nonprice factors, and Crop Supply Response:The Indian Cash Crops," Working papers 132, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    9. Louhichi, Kamel & Flichman, Guillermo & Blanco Fonseca, Maria, "undated". "A generic template for FSSIM," Reports 57463, Wageningen University, SEAMLESS: System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling; Linking European Science and Society.
    10. Olubode-Awosola, O.O. & van Schalkwyk, H.D. & Jooste, A., 2008. "Mathematical modeling of the South African land redistribution for development policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 841-855.
    11. John Roufagalas, 2015. "Supply Locus: A Note on the Supply Decisions of Monopolistic Firms," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 15(1), pages 13-18, Fall.
    12. Liu, Fengwei & You, Liangzhi & Yu, Bingxin, 2010. "Dynamic agricultural supply response under economic transformation," IFPRI discussion papers 987, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Hill, Debbie J. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Piggott, Roley R. & Griffith, Garry R., 2000. "The Dual Approach to Research Evaluation:A Simplified Empirical Illustration," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123661, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Diebold, Francis X. & Lamb, Russell L., 1997. "Why are estimates of agricultural supply response so variable?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 357-373.
    15. Cheng Fang & Bruce A. Babcock, 2003. "China's Cotton Policy and the Impact of China's WTO Accession and Bt Cotton Adoption on the Chinese and U.S. Cotton Sectors," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 03-wp322, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    16. Kingwell, Ross, 1996. "Programming models of farm supply response: The impact of specification errors," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 307-324.
    17. Just, Richard E., 2000. "Some Guiding Principles for Empirical Production Research in Agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 138-158, October.
    18. Guilherme DePaula, 2018. "Technology Adoption and the Agricultural Supply Response Function," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 18-wp582, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Templeton, Deborah J. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & O'Donnell, Christopher J., 2004. "Measuring the Impact of Staple Strength-Enhancing Technologies on Australian Wool Producer Profits: A Duality-Based Approach," Working Papers 12922, University of New England, School of Economics.
    20. Sunil Kanwar, 2004. "Relative Profitability, Supply Shifters and Dynamic Output Response:The Indian Foodgrains," Working papers 133, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hebarc:18607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.