IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi23/344243.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring Community-Based Solutions for Sustainable Mined Land Restoration: A Case Study from Ghana's Small-Scale Mining Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Adu-Baffour, F.
  • Daum, T.
  • Obeng, A. E.
  • Birner, R.
  • Bosch, C.

Abstract

Illegal small-scale mining and processing activities (ASM) have led to vast areas of degraded, contaminated, and abandoned local-community lands, posing a major environmental concern in many developing countries. In the absence of effective state mechanisms to enforce more sustainable mining and post-mining practices, there are increasing discussions on whether community-based solutions could be a second-best solution to restore such lands. This paper analyzes a unique case of an NGO-initiated, community-based ASM land restoration project in Ghana, examining the conditions under which communities could ensure sustainable land rehabilitation outcomes. Qualitative methods are used to map out key actors and relationships to make community-based rehabilitation projects work, followed by the stated preferences method to estimate factors influencing the local communities’ decision to contribute to mined land restoration, including phytoremediation, a technique to reduce contamination. Our findings reveal that there is community support for reclaiming and remediating former ASM lands using communal labor. However, support depends on land tenure arrangements, among other factors. Chiefs, as community overlords, were perceived among the most influential actors as they have the power to enact and enforce local laws and sanction noncompliance with regards to customary land management. Local community members and landowners, however, were seen to be largely not organized, with different land use priorities and unregulated and insecure land tenure structures. Overall, this study shows that community-based solutions could be a second-best option for mined-land rehabilitation, however, such efforts need to pay close attention to social networks, norms, rules, and practices, to be successful and ensure that community members really benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Adu-Baffour, F. & Daum, T. & Obeng, A. E. & Birner, R. & Bosch, C., 2023. "Exploring Community-Based Solutions for Sustainable Mined Land Restoration: A Case Study from Ghana's Small-Scale Mining Sector," GEWISOLA 63rd Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 20-22, 2023 344243, GEWISOLA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi23:344243
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344243/files/157_Adu_Baffour.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghazala Mansuri, 2004. "Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 1-39.
    2. Richard Carson & Jordan Louviere, 2011. "A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 49(4), pages 539-559, August.
    3. Klaus Deininger, 2008. "Implementing Low-Cost Rural Land Certification : The Case of Ethiopia," World Bank Publications - Reports 9528, The World Bank Group.
    4. World Bank, 2020. "Ghana Country Environmental Analysis," World Bank Publications - Reports 33726, The World Bank Group.
    5. Akpalu, Wisdom & Normanyo, Ametefee K., 2017. "Gold Mining Pollution and the Cost of Private Healthcare: The Case of Ghana," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 104-112.
    6. Osterburg, Bernhard & Stratmann, Ursula, 2002. "Die regionale Agrarumweltpolitik in Deutschland unter dem Einfluss der Förderangebote der Europäischen Union," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(05), pages 1-21.
    7. Adu-Baffour, Ferdinand & Daum, Thomas & Birner, Regina, 2021. "Governance challenges of small-scale gold mining in Ghana: Insights from a process net-map study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    2. Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre & Andersson, Henrik & Beaumais, Olivier & Crastes dit Sourd, Romain & Hess, François-Charles & Wolff, François-Charles, 2017. "Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657 recent published articles in journals related to agriculture, environment, or health," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 98(3), November.
    3. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2005. "Agri-Environmental Policy: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24496, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jiang, Meishan & Paudel, Krishna & Mi, Yunsheng, 2017. "Rural Land Transfer and Financial Impact: Evidence from China," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252853, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Araujo, M. Caridad & Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Lanjouw, Peter & Özler, Berk, 2008. "Local inequality and project choice: Theory and evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1022-1046, June.
    6. Van Houtven, George L. & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Usmani, Faraz & Yang, Jui-Chen, 2017. "What are Households Willing to Pay for Improved Water Access? Results from a Meta-Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 126-135.
    7. Aidan Craney, 2020. "Local Participation or Elite Capture in Sheep’s Clothing? A Conundrum of Locally Led Development," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 191-200.
    8. He, Lulu, 2019. "Identifying local needs for post-disaster recovery in Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 52-62.
    9. Deininger, Klaus W. & Liu, Yanyan, 2008. "Economic and Social Impacts of Self-Help Groups in India," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6482, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Azam Chaudhry & Kate Vyborny, 2013. "Patronage in Rural Punjab: Evidence from a New Household Survey Dataset," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 18(Special E), pages 183-209, September.
    11. Richard T. Carson & Miko_aj Czajkowski, 2014. "The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 9, pages 202-235, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Arjan de Haan & Ward Warmerdam, 2012. "The politics of aid revisited: a review of evidence on state capacity and elite commitment," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-007-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    13. Zhan, Shaohua, 2015. "From Privatization to Deindustrialization: Implications of Chinese Rural Industry and the Ownership Debate Revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 108-122.
    14. Ravallion, Martin, 2005. "Inequality is bad for the poor," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3677, The World Bank.
    15. López-Ercilla, I. & Rocha-Tejeda, L. & Fulton, S. & Espinosa-Romero, M.J. & Torre, J. & Fernández Rivera-Melo, F.J., 2024. "Who pays for sustainability in the small-scale fisheries in the global south?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Stoeffler, Quentin & Mills, Bradford & del Ninno, Carlo, 2016. "Reaching the Poor: Cash Transfer Program Targeting in Cameroon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 244-263.
    17. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    18. Ghebru, Hosaena, 2015. "Is There a Merit to the Continuum Tenure Approach? A Case of Demand for Land Rights Formulation in Rural Mozambique," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211683, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    20. Schläpfer, Felix, 2016. "Democratic valuation (DV): Using majority voting principles to value public services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 36-42.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi23:344243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://gewisola.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.