IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa115/116439.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health impact assessment of folate biofortified rice in China

Author

Listed:
  • De Steur, Hans
  • Gellynck, Xavier
  • Storoshenko, Sergei
  • Liqun, Ge
  • Lambert, Willy
  • Van der Straeten, Dominique

Abstract

Introduction : As folate deficiency is mainly caused by the dependency on folate-poor staple crops, such as rice, the implementation of rice with a high level of natural folate could be a successful pro-rural and pro-poor intervention strategy to reduce folate deficiencies in China, where about 260 million people are considered to be folate deficient. Consuming folate biofortified rice instead of conventional rice could prevent someone from negative health outcomes of folate deficiency, such as megaloblastic aneamia and neural-tube defects. Especially for poor Chinese women of childbearing age, folate biofortification could be important to prevent them from having a baby with a neural-tube defect, the main adverse health outcome. As Northern and Southern China differ significantly in terms of rice consumption and production, and folate intake, a regional comparison of the potential health benefits of folate biofortified rice could further underpin the introduction of this strategy in China. Objective : The aim is to measure the potential regional health impact of folate biofortified rice (12 μg per 1 gram of rice) in China. Method : Based on the Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) approach, the health impact of folate enriched rice in China is evaluated as the numbers of DALYs lost that can be reduced. As there is only data available on contribution of folate deficiency to its main adverse health outcome of folate deficiency, i.e. neural-tube defects, the health impact refers to the neural-tube defects that are caused by folate deficiency. Furthermore, two coverage rate of the introduction of folate enriched rice are included based on previous research. Results : Based on the efficacy of folate biofortified rice, the total daily folate intake for Chinese women of childbearing age after biofortification amounts to 1 120 μg, which is significantly higher than the required folate intake. The application of the DALY method shows that the implementation of folate biofortified rice could save 116 090 DALYs (low impact scenario) and 257 345 DALYs (high impact scenario) per year. Although rice consumption is significantly lower in Northern China, the folate intake after biofortication is still high enough to alleviate the burden of neural-tube defects caused by folate deficiency. Furthermore, a rough estimation of the costs of folate biofortification indicates that this policy intervention could be a cost-effective method as well. Conclusions : Although these results underpin folate biofortification of rice as a valuable policy intervention to tackle folate deficiency in different regions of China, further research is required to compare the benefits and costs with other interventions or folate biofortified products.

Suggested Citation

  • De Steur, Hans & Gellynck, Xavier & Storoshenko, Sergei & Liqun, Ge & Lambert, Willy & Van der Straeten, Dominique, 2010. "Health impact assessment of folate biofortified rice in China," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116439, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa115:116439
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.116439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/116439/files/8C-2_De_Steur.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.116439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zimmermann, Roukayatou & Qaim, Matin, 2004. "Potential health benefits of Golden Rice: a Philippine case study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 147-168, April.
    2. Stein, Alexander J. & Sachdev, H.P.S. & Qaim, Matin, 2008. "Genetic Engineering for the Poor: Golden Rice and Public Health in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 144-158, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Li & Ping Qing & Wuyang Hu & Minglai Li, 2022. "Contract farming, community effect, and farmer valuation of biofortified crop varieties in China: The case of high‐zinc wheat," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 1035-1055, May.
    2. Seema Sheoran & Sandeep Kumar & Vinita Ramtekey & Priyajoy Kar & Ram Swaroop Meena & Chetan Kumar Jangir, 2022. "Current Status and Potential of Biofortification to Enhance Crop Nutritional Quality: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Fuli Tan & Jingjing Wang & Yixuan Guo & Taian Deng & Hans De Steur & Shenggen Fan, 2023. "Cost‐effectiveness of zinc interventions in China: A cohort‐based Markov model," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1437-1457, December.
    4. Fen Liao & Yan Li & Ping Qing & Jie Feng & Anxu Wang & Jian Li & Junsheng Huo & Linjie Wang & Tong Chen & Jing Sun & Hongmei Mao, 2023. "Impact of folate biofortified food supplement on rural women's health and willingness‐to‐pay: A study based on a connected randomized controlled trial—Becker–DeGroot–Marschak experiment in China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1458-1477, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glover, Dominic & Kim, Sung Kyu & Stone, Glenn Davis, 2020. "Golden Rice and technology adoption theory: A study of seed choice dynamics among rice growers in the Philippines," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Kym Anderson, 2016. "Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-46925-0, June.
    3. Gunaratna, Nilupa S. & Groote, Hugo De & Nestel, Penelope & Pixley, Kevin V. & McCabe, George P., 2010. "A meta-analysis of community-based studies on quality protein maize," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 202-210, June.
    4. Jeffrey Chow & Eili Y Klein & Ramanan Laxminarayan, 2010. "Cost-Effectiveness of “Golden Mustard” for Treating Vitamin A Deficiency in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Meelan Thondoo & David Rojas-Rueda & Joyeeta Gupta & Daniel H. de Vries & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2019. "Systematic Literature Review of Health Impact Assessments in Low and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Nguema, Abigail & Norton, George W. & Fregene, Martin & Sayre, Richard & Manary, Mark, 2011. "Expected economic benefits of meeting nutritional needs through biofortified cassava in Nigeria and Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Alia, Didier Y. & Agamile, Peter & McFeely, Micah & Anderson, C. Leigh, 2023. "Assessing the Benefits of Multi-biofortified Rice in Nigeria and Ghana using the Disability-Adjusted Life Years Framework," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335948, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Jane Dixon, 2009. "From the imperial to the empty calorie: how nutrition relations underpin food regime transitions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(4), pages 321-333, December.
    9. Mogues, Tewodaj & Yu, Bingxin & Fan, Shenggen & Mcbride, Linden, 2012. "The impacts of public investment in and for agriculture: Synthesis of the existing evidence," IFPRI discussion papers 1217, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Renkow, Mitch & Byerlee, Derek, 2010. "The impacts of CGIAR research: A review of recent evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 391-402, October.
    11. Matin Qaim & Alexander J. Stein & J. V. Meenakshi, 2007. "Economics of biofortification," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(s1), pages 119-133, December.
    12. Perez Suarez, Salomon, 2010. "Biofortification, An Alternative To Reduce Food Insecurity And Its Adverse Effects In Developing Countries: A Honduras Case Study," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116449, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Gunaratna, Nilupa S. & De Groote, Hugo & McCabe, G.P., 2008. "Evaluating the Impact of Biofortification: A Meta-analysis of Community-level Studies on Quality Protein Maize (QPM)," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44166, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Stein, Alexander J. & Meenakshi, J.V. & Qaim, Matin & Nestel, Penelope & Sachdev, H.P.S. & Bhutta, Zulfiqar A., 2008. "Potential impacts of iron biofortification in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1797-1808, April.
    15. Bert Lenaerts & Yann de Mey & Matty Demont, 2018. "Global impact of accelerated plant breeding: Evidence from a meta-analysis on rice breeding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Ecker, Olivier & Mabiso, Athur & Kennedy, Adam & Diao, Xinshen 22905, 2011. "Making agriculture pro-nutrition: Opportunities in Tanzania," IFPRI discussion papers 1124, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Rahman, Mohammad Chhiddikur & Rahaman, Md. Shajedur & Islam, Mohammad Ariful & Omar, Md. Imran & Siddique, Md. Abu Bakr, 2021. "Deployment Strategies for Golden Rice in Bangladesh: A Study on Affordability and Varietal Choice with the Target Beneficiaries," EconStor Preprints 241994, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Dinah Pura T. Depositario & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr. & Ximing Wu & Tiffany P. Laude, 2009. "Effects of Information on Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Golden Rice," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 23(4), pages 457-476, December.
    19. Fiedler, John L. & Kilkuwe, Enoch M. & Birol, Ekin, 2013. "An ex ante analysis of the impact and cost-effectiveness of biofortified high-provitamin A and high-iron banana in Uganda:," IFPRI discussion papers 1277, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Seema Sheoran & Sandeep Kumar & Vinita Ramtekey & Priyajoy Kar & Ram Swaroop Meena & Chetan Kumar Jangir, 2022. "Current Status and Potential of Biofortification to Enhance Crop Nutritional Quality: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa115:116439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.