IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/arpcwp/402736.html

Crop Insurance and Nitrogen Reduction Under Elevated Fertilizer Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Tsiboe, Francis
  • Turner, Dylan
  • Arita, Shawn
  • Jore, Kyle
  • Chakravorty, Rwit
  • Meyer, Seth

Abstract

The 2026 Strait of Hormuz closure drove fertilizer prices sharply higher, prompting a broad federal response focused on supply-side capacity, logistics, and producer income support. This paper examines the demand-side channel that has received less policy attention: the margin at which corn producers may reduce nitrogen fertilizer application rates in response to elevated input prices. The agronomic literature suggests reductions of 12 to 16 percent are feasible without measurable expected yield loss; this paper examines a more conservative 5 percent scenario. Two features of the Federal Crop Insurance Program, Good Farming Practices standards and the multi-year Actual Production History calculation, may create marginal friction for producers contemplating reduction under shock-price conditions, though neither is likely determinative relative to agronomic and weather considerations. Simulation results suggest a 5 percent reduction across insured corn acres would conserve roughly 300,000 short tons of nitrogen, raise federal indemnities by approximately $0.10 billion, and leave approved insurance provider returns above the Standard Reinsurance Agreement target. The paper closes by asking whether existing FCIP mechanisms, GFP interpretation guidance, yield-modification provisions, and AIP make-whole arrangements, warrant further examination in the current price environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan & Arita, Shawn & Jore, Kyle & Chakravorty, Rwit & Meyer, Seth, 2026. "Crop Insurance and Nitrogen Reduction Under Elevated Fertilizer Prices," ARPC White Paper 402736, North Dakota State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:arpcwp:402736
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.402736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/402736/files/ARPC%20White%20Paper%202026-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.402736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn Sheriff, 2005. "Efficient Waste? Why Farmers Over-Apply Nutrients and the Implications for Policy Design," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(4), pages 542-557.
    2. Arita, Shawn & Chakravorty, Rwit & Kim, Jiyeon & Lwin, Wuit Yi & Steinbach, Sandro, 2026. "Strait of Hormuz Closure and Global Fertilizer Trade Disruptions," NDSU Agricultural Trade Monitor, North Dakota State University, vol. 2026(03), March.
    3. Bruce A. Babcock, 1992. "The Effects of Uncertainty on Optimal Nitrogen Applications," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 271-280.
    4. Francisco Palmero & Eric A. Davidson & Kaiyu Guan & Alison J. Eagle & Hannah E. Birgé & P. V. Vara Prasad & Trevor J. Hefley & Jeffrey R. Schussler & Ignacio A. Ciampitti, 2026. "Environmental and societal costs of maize production decrease by addressing the uncertainty in nitrogen rate recommendations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Paulson, Nicholas D. & Babcock, Bruce A., 2010. "Readdressing the Fertilizer Problem," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Arita, Shawn & Wang, Ming & Kim, Jiyeon & Chakravorty, Rwit & Steinbach, Sandro, 2026. "Fertilizer Price Projections Under Strait of Hormuz Disruption Scenarios," NDSU Agricultural Trade Monitor, North Dakota State University, vol. 2026(04), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tihomir Ancev & Moriah Bostian, 2026. "Optimal timing and rate of nitrogen fertilizer use: An integrated network technology approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 108(3), pages 856-873, May.
    2. Jiangying Guo & Jiwei Chen, 2022. "The Impact of Heavy Rainfall Variability on Fertilizer Application Rates: Evidence from Maize Farmers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. repec:isu:genstf:201701010800006248 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sellars, Sarah C. & Schnitkey, Gary D. & Gentry, Laura F., 2020. "Do Illinois Farmers Follow University-Based Nitrogen Recommendations?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304617, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Francisco Rosas & Bruce Babcock & Dermot Hayes, 2015. "Nitrous oxide emission reductions from cutting excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 353-367, September.
    6. Sergei Schaub & Nadja El Benni, 2024. "How do price (risk) changes influence farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 365-383, March.
    7. Benjamin Dequiedt & Emmanuel Servonnat, 2016. "Risk as a limit or an opportunity to mitigate GHG emissions? The case of fertilisation in agriculture," Working Papers 1606, Chaire Economie du climat.
    8. Bo Xiong & John C. Beghin, 2017. "Stringent Maximum Residue Limits, Protectionism, and Competitiveness: The Cases of the US and Canada," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 12, pages 193-207, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Niklas Möhring & Martina Bozzola & Stefan Hirsch & Robert Finger, 2020. "Are pesticides risk decreasing? The relevance of pesticide indicator choice in empirical analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 429-444, May.
    10. Finger, Robert, 2012. "Nitrogen use and the effects of nitrogen taxation under consideration of production and price risks," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 13-20.
    11. Finger, Robert, 2011. "Reductions of Agricultural Nitrogen Use Under Consideration of Production and Price Risks," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114356, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Sonoda, Tadashi, 2025. "Heterogeneity in the Off-Farm Labor Market: A Panel Data Evidence from Bangladesh," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360942, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. repec:isu:genstf:201201010800003744 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Burkhart, Christopher S. & Jha, Manoj K., 2012. "Site-Specific Simulation of Nutrient Control Policies: Integrating Economic and Water Quality Effects," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(01), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Ming Wing & Rwit Chakravorty & Shawn Arita & Sandro Steinbach, 2026. "Four Months After the Strait of Hormuz Closure: Fertilizer Market Adjustment and a Revised Outlook," ARPC White Paper 404235, North Dakota State University.
    16. Francisco Rosas & Bruce A. Babcock & Dermot J. Hayes, 2011. "A Nonlinear Offset Program to Reduce Nitrous Oxide Emissions Induced by Excessive Nitrogen Application," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 11-wp521, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    17. Haneishi, Yusuke & Maruyama, Atsushi & Takagaki, Michiko & Kikuchi, Masao, 2014. "Farmers’ risk attitudes to influence the productivity and planting decision: A case of rice and maize cultivation in rural Uganda," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Murilo Almeida‐Furtado & Miranda P. M. Meuwissen & Frederic Ang, 2025. "Triple gains: More production, less nitrogen and greater diversity from cropland reallocation in England and Wales," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 359-390, June.
    19. Brian Lee & Jhih‐Yun Liu & Hung‐Hao Chang, 2020. "The choice of marketing channel and farm profitability: Empirical evidence from small farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 402-421, June.
    20. Elobeid, Amani & Carriquiry, Miguel A. & Demotier, Jerome & Rosas, Juan (Francisco) & Mulik, Kranti & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Hayes, Dermot J. & Babcock, Bruce A., 2013. "Biofuel Expansion, Fertilizer Use and GHG Emissions: Unintended Consequences of Mitigation Policies," Staff General Research Papers Archive 37415, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    21. Helena Wehmeyer & Annalyn H. de Guia & Melanie Connor, 2020. "Reduction of Fertilizer Use in South China—Impacts and Implications on Smallholder Rice Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    22. De Almeida Furtado, Murilo & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Ang, Frederic, 2024. "Land reallocation to increase production and reduce nitrogen surplus: impacts on crop diversity in England and Wales," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343878, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arpcwp:402736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ndsu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.