Author
Listed:
- Arita, Shawn
- Chakravorty, Rwit
- Kim, Jiyeon
- Lwin, Wuit Yi
- Steinbach, Sandro
Abstract
The March 2026 NDSU Agricultural Trade Monitor examines how the closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted global fertilizer and fertilizer feedstock trade and assesses the implications for U.S. agriculture and major importing countries. Triggered by military escalation between the United States, Israel, and Iran in late February 2026, the closure halted commercial shipping through one of the world’s most important energy and fertilizer corridors, blocking large shares of globally traded urea, sulfur, ammonia, and phosphate. The analysis shows that the Persian Gulf accounts for a substantial portion of seaborne fertilizer trade and that the disruption extends beyond direct Gulf exports through sulfur-dependent phosphate production in countries such as China, Morocco, and Indonesia. The report finds that the United States faces meaningful exposure in urea and phosphate markets, although domestic ammonia production and North American supply relationships provide some buffer. Other major agricultural economies, including Brazil, India, and Australia, appear more vulnerable because of their greater reliance on Gulf shipments. Compared with the 2022 Russia-Ukraine trade shock, the current disruption is more concentrated on fertilizer and input costs than on grain markets, limiting the crop price offset that supported farm revenues in 2022. The report concludes that the duration of the closure will be the key determinant of fertilizer price escalation and farm margin pressure in 2026.
Suggested Citation
Arita, Shawn & Chakravorty, Rwit & Kim, Jiyeon & Lwin, Wuit Yi & Steinbach, Sandro, 2026.
"Strait of Hormuz Closure and Global Fertilizer Trade Disruptions,"
NDSU Agricultural Trade Monitor, North Dakota State University, vol. 2026(03), March.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ndsutm:396250
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.396250
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndsutm:396250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/candsus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.