IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes008/36872.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Winners and losers from Johne’s disease eradication from the Scottish dairy herd: a Markov-Chain simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Weldegebriel, Habtu T.
  • Gunn, George J.
  • Stott, Alistair W.

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluated the welfare effects of a hypothetical programme of Johne's disease eradication from the Scottish dairy herd on different stakeholders in the domestic milk market. We undertook the evaluation using a Markov-Chain simulation and applying an economic welfare analysis which takes into consideration the effects of an eradication programme on product price, on output quantity, on cost and on milk yield for given levels of supply and demand elasticities. We found that, following the eradication of the disease, milk yield per cow increased for all herd sizes in Scotland whereas price and unit cost of milk production fell. Consequently, milk consumers gained around £14.3 million in discounted economic surplus and producers with infected herds around £13.4 million whereas producers with uninfected herds lost around £10.7 million in discounted surplus. The gain in surplus made by consumers and owners of infected herds, however, more than made up for the loss in surplus made by owners of un-infected herds. Therefore, on balance, Scotland gained a net economic surplus of £17 million from the programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Weldegebriel, Habtu T. & Gunn, George J. & Stott, Alistair W., 2008. "Winners and losers from Johne’s disease eradication from the Scottish dairy herd: a Markov-Chain simulation," 82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK 36872, Agricultural Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes008:36872
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.36872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/36872/files/Weldegebriel_gunn_stott.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.36872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. M. Alston & G. M. Scobie, 1983. "Distribution of Research Gains in Multistage Production Systems: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 353-356.
    2. van Arendonk, J. A. M., 1985. "A model to estimate the performance, revenues and costs of dairy cows under different production and price situations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 157-189.
    3. David R. Oglethorpe, 1995. "Sensitivity Of Farm Plans Under Risk‐Averse Behaviour: A Note On The Environmental Implications," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 227-232, May.
    4. Per Pinstrup-Andersen & Norha Ruiz de Londoño & Edward Hoover, 1976. "The Impact of Increasing Food Supply on Human Nutrition: Implications for Commodity Priorities in Agricultural Research and Policy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(2), pages 133-142.
    5. Erik Lichtenberg & Douglas D. Parker & David Zilberman, 1988. "Marginal Analysis of Welfare Costs of Environmental Policies: The Case of Pesticide Regulation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(4), pages 867-874.
    6. J. W. Freebairn & J. S. Davis & G. W. Edwards, 1983. "Distribution of Research Gains in Multistage Production Systems: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 357-359.
    7. Richard Bennett, 2003. "The ‘Direct Costs’of Livestock Disease: The Development of a System of Models for the Analysis of 30 Endemic Livestock Diseases in Great Britain," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 55-71, March.
    8. Rockhill, B. & Newman, B. & Weinberg, C., 1998. "Use and misuse of population attributable fractions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(1), pages 15-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alyson S Barratt & Matthieu H Arnoult & Bouda Vosough Ahmadi & Karl M Rich & George J Gunn & Alistair W Stott, 2018. "A framework for estimating society's economic welfare following the introduction of an animal disease: The case of Johne's disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Layman, B.D., 1999. "A Structural Model of the World Wool Market," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 123691, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Borrell, Brent & Jiang, Tingsong & Pearce, David & Gould, Ian, 2014. "Payoffs from research and development along the Australian food value chain: a general equilibrium analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(3), July.
    4. O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R. & Nightingale, John J. & Piggott, Roley R., 2003. "Testing for Market Power in the Australian Grains and Oilseeds Industries: Further Results," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57930, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Grant M. Scobie & John D. Mullen & Julian M. Alston, 1991. "The Returns To Investment In Research On Australian Wool Production," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(2), pages 179-195, August.
    7. Goletti, Francesco & Wolff, Christiane, 1999. "The impact of postharvest research," MTID discussion papers 29, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Cai, Hailong & Kinnucan, Henry W., 2009. "The Compensative Effects of Tobacco Leaf Price Changes on Tax Revenue in China," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46727, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. George Verikios, 2006. "Understanding the World Wool Market: Trade, Productivity and Grower Incomes. Part 1: Introduction," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    10. Xueyan Zhao & Kym Anderson & Glyn Wittwer, 2019. "Who Gains from Australian Generic Wine Promotion and R&D?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 9, pages 189-223, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Xayavong, Vilaphonh & Radhakrishnan, Manju & Kingwell, Ross S., 2013. "Development Strategies for a Premium Wine Region of Australia: an application of value chain modelling," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152186, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Christopher J. O'Donnell & Garry R. Griffith & John J. Nightingale & Roley R. Piggott, 2007. "Testing for market power in the Australian grains and oilseeds industries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 349-376.
    13. Gamal Atallah, 2002. "Vertical R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Market Structure, and Innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 179-209.
    14. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1989. "The Impact Of Farm And Processing Research On The Australian Wool Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Kinnucan, Henry W., 2003. "Optimal generic advertising in an imperfectly competitive food industry with variable proportions," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 143-158, October.
    16. Voon, Thomas Jan P., 1992. "Research Payoff in an Imperfect Market: The Case of Animal Disease Vaccine in Australia," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147351, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    17. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R., 2011. "A pig in a poke? Accounting for uncertainty about elasticity values in an EDM of the Australian pig industry," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 19, pages 1-9.
    18. Digal, Larry N. & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 2002. "Market power analysis in the retail food industry: a survey of methods," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1-26.
    19. X. Zhao & J.D. Mullen & G.R. Griffith & R.R. Piggott & W.E. Griffiths, 2002. "The Economic Incidence of R&D and Promotion Investments in the Australian Beef Industry," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 16/02, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    20. Freebairn, John W., 1992. "Evaluating The Level And Distribution Of Benefits From Dairy Industry Research," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes008:36872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.