IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare92/146537.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modelling Distortionary Aspects of the US Wheat Program and Policy Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Labson, B. Stephen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Labson, B. Stephen, 1992. "Modelling Distortionary Aspects of the US Wheat Program and Policy Reform," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146537, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare92:146537
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.146537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/146537/files/1992-05-22-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.146537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick C. Westhoff & Deborah L. Stephens & Michael D. Helmar & Brian L. Buhr & William H. Meyers, 1990. "Evaluation of Policy Scenarios for the 1990 Farm Bill, An," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 90-sr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Labson, B. Stephen & Rausser, Gordon C., 1992. "Modeling Phased Reduction of Distortionary Policies in the U.S. Wheat Market Under Alternative Macroeconomic Environments," Staff General Research Papers Archive 502, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Roningen, Vernon & Sullivan, John & Wainio, John, 1987. "The Impact of the Removal of Support to Agriculture in Developed Countries," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269904, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. de Gorter, Harry & Fisher, Eric O'N., 1989. "The Dynamic Effects Of Agricultural Subsidy Programs In The United States," Working Papers 6875, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Patrick C. Westhoff & Deborah L. Stephens & Michael D. Helmar & Brian L. Buhr & William H. Meyers, 1990. "Evaluation of Policy Scenarios for the 1990 Farm Bill, An," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 90-sr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. John Whalley & Randall M. Wigle, 1988. "Endogenous Participation in Agricultural Support Programs and Ad ValoremEquivalent Modelling," NBER Working Papers 2583, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Love, H. Alan & Foster, William E., 1990. "Commodity Program Slippage Rates For Corn And Wheat," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Stephen Labson & Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Modeling Phased Reduction of Distortionary Policies in the U.S. Wheat Market under Alternative Macroeconomic Environments," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 90-gatt11, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. C. S. C. Sekhar, 2010. "Structure of the World Wheat Market: Some Implications for Strategic Trade Policy?," Journal of Quantitative Economics, The Indian Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 142-158.
    3. Jeffrey D. McDonald & Daniel A. Sumner, 2003. "The Influence of Commodity Programs on Acreage Response to Market Price: With an Illustration Concerning Rice Policy in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 857-871.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antônio Salazar P. Brandão & Will J. Martin, 1993. "Implications of agricultural trade liberalization for the developing countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(4), pages 313-343, June.
    2. Thomas, Alban & Chakir, Raja, 2020. "Unintended consequences of environmental policies: the case of set-aside and agricultural intensification," TSE Working Papers 20-1066, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    3. Roningen, Vernon & Dixit, Praveen & Sullivan, John & Hart, Tracey, 1991. "Overview of the Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278390, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Roningen, Vernon & Dixit, Praveen & Sullivan, John & Hart, Tracy, 1991. "Overview of the Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278513, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Khanna, Madhu & Isik, Murat & Zilberman, David, 2002. "Cost-effectiveness of alternative green payment policies for conservation technology adoption with heterogeneous land quality," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 157-174, August.
    6. Haley, Stephen L., 1988. "Joint Products In The Swopsim Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Foster, William E. & Babcock, Bruce A., 1993. "Commodity Policy, Price Incentives, and the Growth in Per-Acre Yields," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 253-265, July.
    8. Johnston, Brian G., 0. "An Australian Perspective On Agricultural Trade And The Uruguay Round," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    9. Johnston, B. G., 1990. "Targeting Australian Agricultural Policies For Trade Liberalization," Staff Reports 278342, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    11. Keeney, Roman & Hertel, Thomas W., 2008. "Yield Response To Prices: Implications For Policy Modeling," Working papers 45969, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Bucholtz, Shawn & Roberts, Michael J., 2002. "Slippage Or Spurious Correlation: An Analysis Of The Conservation Reserve Program," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19714, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Haley, Stephen L., 1988. "Targeting Of U.S. Agricultural Export Subsidies: A Theoretical Analysis," Staff Reports 278018, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Kenneth C. Carraro & Cletus C. Coughlin, 1988. "The dubious success of export subsidies for wheat," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Nov, pages 38-47.
    15. Hiemstra, Stephen W. & Shane, Mathew, 1988. "Monetary Factors Influencing GATT Negotiations on Agriculture," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 147990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Nathan P. Hendricks, 2022. "Would farmers benefit from removing more land from production in the next farm bill?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1139-1157, September.
    17. Dana L. Hoag & William E. Foster & Bruce A. Babcock, 1993. "Field-Level Measurement of Land Productivity and Program Slippage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(1), pages 181-189.
    18. repec:cdl:agrebk:qt21913950 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Robinson, Sherman & Kilkenny, Maureen & Adelman, Irma, 1988. "The Effect of Trade Liberalization in Agriculture on the U.S. Economy to 1991," CUDARE Working Papers 198475, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. Tweeten, Luther & Pai, Dee-Yu, 1990. "Public Policy and the Competitive Position of U.S. Agriculture in World Markets," Occasional Papers 232834, Regional Research Project NC-194: Organization and Performance of World Food Systems.
    21. Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, 1988. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Analyses Of Government Support," Staff Reports 278064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare92:146537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.