IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/fpaper/90-sr42.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of Policy Scenarios for the 1990 Farm Bill, An

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick C. Westhoff
  • Deborah L. Stephens
  • Michael D. Helmar
  • Brian L. Buhr
  • William H. Meyers

Abstract

Three alternatives for 1990 farm legislation are examined: (1) a continuation of current legislation; (2) small reductions in producer support levels that are phased in after a two-year delay; and (3) more significant policy reforms that include immediate support reductions for grains and cotton, marketing quotas for dairy products and sugar, and an expanded conservation reserve. Analysis indicates that the alternatives to current policies reduce both government outlays on farm programs and net farm income. The effects on the supply, demand, and prices of most crop and livestock commodities are small. Marketing quotas protect sugar and dairy producer income and allow increased imports without significant budgetary effects, but at considerable cost to consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick C. Westhoff & Deborah L. Stephens & Michael D. Helmar & Brian L. Buhr & William H. Meyers, 1990. "Evaluation of Policy Scenarios for the 1990 Farm Bill, An," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 90-sr42, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ias:fpaper:90-sr42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/90sr42.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=843
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Labson, B. Stephen, 1994. "Modeling distortionary aspects of the U.S. wheat program and policy reform," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 237-263, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:fpaper:90-sr42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.