IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404753.html

Improving Centuries of Rural Land Misallocation: The Role of Village Merging in China

Author

Listed:
  • Bai, Chengxi
  • Liu, Naixi
  • Dai, Wenrui

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the number of natural villages in China has declined from approximately 3.5 million to about 2.3 million. Using nationwide 30-meter resolution satellite remote sensing data combined with county-level panel data for more than 2,700 counties from 2000 to 2023, this study examines the relationship between village merging and agricultural productivity growth. The results reveal a robust and positive association between the intensity of village merging and agricultural total factor productivity, and this relationship remains stable across a wide range of robustness checks. The positive effect is also observed in the context of three major policy interventions that significantly accelerated village merging: the Urban-Rural Construction Land Linkage Policy, Poverty Alleviation Relocation, and Village Merging Pilot programs. Mechanism analysis shows that village merging enhances agricultural productivity mainly by optimizing the spatial layout of agricultural facility land to support contiguous large-scale operations, promoting the specialization of agricultural producers, and improving human capital. Further heterogeneity analysis indicates that the magnitude of these effects varies across different stages of economic development, agricultural industrial structures, and geographic regions. Overall, this study provides new insights into China’s development experience in alleviating land misallocation and improving agricultural productivity in the contemporary era.

Suggested Citation

  • Bai, Chengxi & Liu, Naixi & Dai, Wenrui, 2026. "Improving Centuries of Rural Land Misallocation: The Role of Village Merging in China," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404753, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404753
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404753/files/177676_191937_115232_AAEA_Improving_Centuries_Rural_Land_Misallocation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panpan Diao & Zhonggen Zhang & Zhenyong Jin, 2018. "Dynamic and static analysis of agricultural productivity in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 293-312, May.
    2. Panpan Diao & Zhonggen Zhang & Zhenyong Jin, 2018. "Dynamic and static analysis of agricultural productivity in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 293-312, May.
    3. Du, Xindong & Zhang, Xiaoke & Jin, Xiaobin, 2018. "Assessing the effectiveness of land consolidation for improving agricultural productivity in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 360-367.
    4. Gao, Xuwen & Shi, Xinjie & Fang, Shile, 2021. "Property rights and misallocation: Evidence from land certification in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Paresh Kumar Narayan & Guang‐Zhen Sun, 2007. "The Division of Labor, Capital, Communication Technology and Economic Growth: The Case of China 1952–99," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 645-664, November.
    6. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Efficiency and distribution of rural construction land marketization in contemporary China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Jiao, Man & Xu, Hengzhou, 2022. "How do Collective Operating Construction Land (COCL) Transactions affect rural residents’ property income? Evidence from rural Deqing County, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Jieyong Wang & Yu Zhang, 2021. "Analysis on the Evolution of Rural Settlement Pattern and Its Influencing Factors in China from 1995 to 2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Mao, Weining & Koo, Won W., 1997. "Productivity growth, technological progress, and efficiency change in chinese agriculture after rural economic reforms: A DEA approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 157-174.
    10. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Peter J. Klenow, 2009. "Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1403-1448.
    11. Wanjun Yao & Chunan Wang, 2022. "Agricultural land marketization and productivity: evidence from China," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 22-36, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengfei Ge & Tan Liu & Xiaoxu Wu & Xiulu Huang, 2023. "Heterogenous Urbanization and Agricultural Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Dongdong Lu & Zilong Wang, 2023. "Towards green economic recovery: how to improve green total factor productivity," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3163-3185, October.
    3. Zhu, Ning & Streimikis, Justas & Yu, Zhiqian & Balezentis, Tomas, 2023. "Energy-sustainable agriculture in the European Union member states: Overall productivity growth and structural efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    4. Yuan, Chunlai & Fan, Yuxi & Xu, Baoxiang, 2025. "Impact of China’s rural collective construction land marketization reform on unlocking entrepreneurial potential," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Tuanbiao Jiang & Min Zhong & Anrong Gao & Guoqun Ma, 2024. "Do Factor Misallocations Affect Food Security? Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Troncoso Sepúlveda, Ricardo Andrés & Gil Roig, José María, 2025. "The role of government credit in enhancing agricultural productivity: Evidence from Chile," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Zhang, Xiaoheng & Hu, Lingxiao & Yu, Xiaohua, 2023. "Farmland Leasing, misallocation Reduction, and agricultural total factor Productivity: Insights from rice production in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Long Zeng & Jiazhou Yao & Ziqi Yi & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang, 2025. "Evaluating the Impact of Rural Construction Land Marketization on Rural Industrial Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Zhao, Bingyu & Hu, Haiqing & Yang, Tan, 2026. "Can the emphasis of local governments on the ecological environment fix energy resource misallocation? Mechanisms and environmental results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    10. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Ying Chen & Kejun Li, 2026. "Urban–Rural Construction Land Market Integration Under Rural Land Institutional Reform: Evidence From Three Pilot Regions in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), June.
    12. Tasso Adamopoulos & Loren Brandt & Jessica Leight & Diego Restuccia, 2022. "Misallocation, Selection, and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis With Panel Data From China," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(3), pages 1261-1282, May.
    13. Xuelan Li & Rui Guan, 2023. "How Does Agricultural Mechanization Service Affect Agricultural Green Transformation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Zhu, Jinwei & Ke, Xinli & He, Lijie, 2025. "How collectively owned operating construction land marketization affects rural industrial convergence: Empirical evidence from a rural land institutional reform in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Mu Lin & Jingxin Gao & Yongjie Du & Pengyu Ren, 2023. "Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Wen, Lanjiao & Yang, Shenjie & Qi, Mengna & Zhang, Anlu, 2024. "How does China’s rural collective commercialized land market run? New evidence from 26 pilot areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Ye, Xin & Xiang, Ai & Gao, Runyi & Chuai, Xiaowei, 2025. "The impact of spatiotemporal change in cropland use on local urban cereal supply in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    18. Tan, Ruipeng & Li, Jun & Wang, Feng & Yang, Jing, 2025. "Electricity transmission and its effects on resource misallocation and environmental consequences in China: An economic analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Haiyang Shang & Ying Feng & Ching-Cheng Lu & Chih-Yu Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Optimizing Industrial Energy Efficiency on Agricultural Development in OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Yidan Liang, 2023. "Capital and labour distortion in China: a systematic literature review using HistCite," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1759-1784, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.