IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4197-d1650147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impact of Rural Construction Land Marketization on Rural Industrial Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Long Zeng

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Jiazhou Yao

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Ziqi Yi

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Xinhai Lu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yifeng Tang

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

Abstract

Industrial prosperity is the prerequisite and foundation of rural revitalization, while rural collective operating construction land (COCL), as an important resource for rural industrial development, has significant theoretical and practical guiding significance regarding whether its market-oriented reform can promote rural industrial integration (RII). This study innovatively combines the synthetic control method (SCM) and mediation effect model to assess the impact of rural collective operating construction land entering the market (COCLEM) on RII, using panel data from 86 counties in Hunan Province (2011–2022), and its underlying mechanisms. This study finds that COCLEM significantly enhances RII, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of tests. A mechanism analysis indicates that COCLEM primarily promotes RII through population agglomeration, fiscal support, and technological upgrading. Furthermore, this study reveals that COCLEM effectively facilitates the extension of the agricultural industry chain and promotes the development of agricultural services. Nevertheless, the improvement of rural infrastructure still requires policy guidance and sustained investment to provide more robust support for RII. Therefore, policymakers should actively formulate a COCLEM policy framework, enhance rural public services, and increase infrastructure investment to continuously promote regional population agglomeration. Local governments should be responsible for ensuring policy implementation and financial support. Additionally, emphasis should be placed on the role of COCLEM in advancing agricultural technology to support RII. Compared with existing research, this study provides new empirical methods and theoretical insights for detailed research on the development of RII.

Suggested Citation

  • Long Zeng & Jiazhou Yao & Ziqi Yi & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang, 2025. "Evaluating the Impact of Rural Construction Land Marketization on Rural Industrial Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4197-:d:1650147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Malecki, 2004. "Jockeying for Position: What It Means and Why It Matters to Regional Development Policy When Places Compete," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1101-1120.
    2. Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal, 2003. "The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 113-132, March.
    3. Jiao, Man & Xu, Hengzhou, 2022. "How do Collective Operating Construction Land (COCL) Transactions affect rural residents’ property income? Evidence from rural Deqing County, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Xu, Hengzhou & Jiao, Man, 2021. "City size, industrial structure and urbanization quality—A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Colin G. Brown & Scott A. Waldron & John W. Longworth, 2005. "Rural development in China: Industry policy, regionalism, integration and scale," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 32(1/2), pages 17-33, January.
    6. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Efficiency and distribution of rural construction land marketization in contemporary China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Yaqiu Liu & Xiaoqian Zhang & Meng Xu & Xinghao Zhang & Bowen Shan & Ailing Wang, 2022. "Spatial Patterns and Driving Factors of Rural Population Loss under Urban–Rural Integration Development: A Micro-Scale Study on the Village Level in a Hilly Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Xiaolong Gao & Changfei Li & Ehsan Elahi & Mohammad Ilyas Abro & Zhaocai Cui, 2023. "Technological Innovation, Product Quality and Upgrading of Manufacturing Value Chain: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Jiaqing Zhang & Ziyan Chen & Biqiao Hu & Daolin Zhu, 2024. "Do Regional Integration Policies Promote Integrated Urban–Rural Development? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Zihao Li & Xihang Xie & Xinyue Yan & Tingting Bai & Dong Xu, 2022. "Impact of China’s Rural Land Marketization on Ecological Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Li, Xunhuan & Wang, Yongsheng & Wang, Zhaosheng, 2024. "Quantifying the industrial development modes and their capability of realizing the ecological value in rural China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Wu, Yuzhe & Mo, Zhibin & Peng, Yi & Skitmore, Martin, 2018. "Market-driven land nationalization in China: A new system for the capitalization of rural homesteads," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 559-569.
    14. Jing Li & Haoyang Liu & Wei-Yew Chang, 2024. "Evaluating the Effect of Fiscal Support for Agriculture on Three-Industry Integration in Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Jordan Jeffrey & Mathur Aparna & Munasib Abdul & Roy Devesh, 2021. "Did Right-To-Work Laws Impact Income Inequality? Evidence from U.S. States Using the Synthetic Control Method," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 45-81, January.
    16. Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak & Xuan Shen, 2015. "Agricultural credit and economic growth in rural areas," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 302-312, September.
    17. Jie Zhou & Haipeng Chen & Qingyun Bai & Linxin Liu & Guohong Li & Qianling Shen, 2023. "Can the Integration of Rural Industries Help Strengthen China’s Agricultural Economic Resilience?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Alfred Wu & Mi Lin, 2012. "Determinants of government size: evidence from China," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 255-270, April.
    19. Mingyu Zhang & Qiuxiao Chen & Kewei Zhang & Dongye Yang, 2021. "Will Rural Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketization Impact Local Governments’ Interest Distribution? Evidence from Mainland China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Man Jiao & Hengzhou Xu, 2022. "Does Rural Construction Land Marketization Inhibit State-Owned Industrial Land Transactions? Evidence from Huzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    21. Zhihan Xu & Jianchun Xu & Xiaofang Chai & Ning Zhang & Rong Ye & Fei Xu, 2022. "Rural Revitalization and Land Institution Reform: Achievement, Conflict and Potential Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    22. Wei Wang & Yulin Zhu & Wen-Long Shang, 2022. "Impact of Labour Productivity Differences on Urban-Rural Integration Development and Its Spatial Effect: Evidence from a Spatial Durbin Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, October.
    23. Wang, Jingyu & Peng, Lu & Chen, Jiancheng & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2024. "Impact of rural industrial integration on farmers' income: Evidence from agricultural counties in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    24. Heping Ge & Bowen Li & Decai Tang & Hao Xu & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Research on Digital Inclusive Finance Promoting the Integration of Rural Three-Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    25. Wubneh, Mulatu, 2018. "Policies and praxis of land acquisition, use, and development in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 170-183.
    26. Zhong, Taiyang & Zhang, Xiaoling & Huang, Xianjin & Liu, Fang, 2019. "Blessing or curse? Impact of land finance on rural public infrastructure development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 130-141.
    27. Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak & Xuan Shen, 2015. "Agricultural credit and economic growth in rural areas," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 302-312, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim Ayoade Adekunle & Adewale Rafiu Aregbeshola, 2025. "Evaluating the agricultural policy-productivity gap in Nigeria: a Markov-switching analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Shenjie Yang & Lanjiao Wen, 2023. "Regional Heterogeneity in China’s Rural Collectively Owned Commercialized Land Market: An Empirical Analysis from 2015–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Lei Yan & Xubin Lei & Kairong Hong & Hui Li & Mengyuan Chen, 2022. "Improving Farmer Willingness to Participate in the Transfer of Land Rights in Rural China: A Preference-Based Income Distribution Scheme," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Amr Khafagy & Mauro Vigani, 2023. "External finance and agricultural productivity growth," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 448-472, March.
    5. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Xiaotong Li & Ying Li & Jinlan Ni & Jia Yuan, 2022. "Master development, land appreciation, and government finance: Evidence from the Disney project in Shanghai," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 1027-1046, August.
    7. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Shanping Wang & Peng Cao & Xiao Ouyang, 2024. "Nonlinear influence of construction land on poverty reduction efficiency in Chinese poor counties: new evidence using a panel threshold model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3557-3587, February.
    9. Zhenyu Qi & Zixing Wu & Yuezhou You & Xiaoying Zhan, 2024. "Can Rural Industrial Convergence Alleviate Urban–Rural Income Inequality?: Empirical Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.
    10. Kunzai Niu & Hengzhou Xu, 2023. "Urban–rural Integration and Poverty: Different Roles of Urban–rural Integration in Reducing Rural and Urban Poverty in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 737-757, February.
    11. Yubo Wang & Yuyu Xue & Jianchao Xi, 2022. "Inter-Provincial Differences in Potential Obstacles to Land Transfer Income to Support Rural Revitalization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Yun Shen & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Rui Wang & Yanxi Jing, 2024. "Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanism of Rural Industrial Integration Development: A Case of Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Huawang Jin & Chuanzhong Du & Mengchen Wang & Yameng Wang & Lei Chen, 2024. "Reducing the Consumption Gap Between Urban and Rural Areas: The Role of Rural Industrial Integration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Liguo Wang & Fenghua Liu & Jiangtao Gao, 2025. "Examining Whether Participation in Industrial Integration Can Enhance Farmers’ Income Based on Empirical Evidence from the “Hundred Villages and Thousand Households” Survey in Jiangxi Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-35, September.
    15. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Tao Xia & Elias G. Carayannis & Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Nikos Kanellos, 2024. "Technology transfer for sustainable rural development: evidence from homestead withdrawal with compensation in Chengdu–Chongqing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 303-333, February.
    17. Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Yeneneh Hunie & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Evaluating Institutional Dichotomy between Urban and Rural Land Administration in Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Yingzheng Yan & Liupeng Chen & Ziwei Zhou & Yuanzhu Wei, 2025. "Digital financial inclusion and agricultural modernization development in China—a study based on the perspective of agricultural mechanization services," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Lin Zhou & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Collective Action for the Market-Based Reform of Land Element in China: The Role of Trust," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Zou, Yucheng & Yan, Lei & Zhang, Yanwei, 2023. "Game analysis of incremental income allocation in the marketization of rural collectively-owned commercial construction land under fairness preference," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-14.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4197-:d:1650147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.