IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/360669.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Rationality of Farmland Price Expectations for Measures of Central Tendency

Author

Listed:
  • Robertson, Dewey

Abstract

Farmland price expectations play an important role in price discovery, investing, and lending. Previous studies find that farmland price expectations collected through surveys are often not rational (biased or inefficient), based on tests that assume respondents report the mean of their distribution of expectations. However, the exact statistical quantity that respondents report is often unknown. Using price expectations from the Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rents Survey, 1980-2023, we examine the degree to which respondents’ price expectations may be considered rational at the mean, median, or mode, as well as convex combinations thereof. We find that farmland price expectations are mean-rational in only half of the cases. Yet, farmland price expectations are mode-rational in roughly 72% of cases, including those that are both mean and mode rational. Thus, all cases are rational at either the mean, mode, or both, and our results suggest that respondents likely report the mode or “most likely” value.

Suggested Citation

  • Robertson, Dewey, 2025. "The Rationality of Farmland Price Expectations for Measures of Central Tendency," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360669, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360669
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360669/files/75163_95359_105300_Robertson_AAEA2025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.360669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Nolde & Johanna F. Ziegel, 2016. "Elicitability and backtesting: Perspectives for banking regulation," Papers 1608.05498, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2017.
    2. Kuethe, Todd H. & Hubbs, Todd, . "Bankers' Forecasts of Farmland Values: A Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(4).
    3. Gneiting, Tilmann, 2011. "Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 746-762.
    4. Todd H. Kuethe & Brady Brewer & Chad Fiechter, 2022. "Loss Aversion in Farmland Price Expectations," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(1), pages 98-114.
    5. Keith C. Brown & Deborah J. Brown, 1984. "Heterogenous Expectations and Farmland Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(2), pages 164-169.
    6. Graham Elliott & Allan Timmermann & Ivana Komunjer, 2005. "Estimation and Testing of Forecast Rationality under Flexible Loss," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(4), pages 1107-1125.
    7. Todd H Kuethe & David Oppedahl, 2021. "Agricultural bankers’ farmland price expectations," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(1), pages 42-59.
    8. Chad Fiechter & Todd Kuethe & Wendong Zhang, 2025. "Information Rigidities and Farmland Value Expectations," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 101(2), pages 218-229.
    9. Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak & Xuan Shen, 2015. "Agricultural credit and economic growth in rural areas," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 302-312, September.
    10. Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak & Xuan Shen, 2015. "Agricultural credit and economic growth in rural areas," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 302-312, September.
    11. Weber, Elke U & Kirsner, Britt, 1997. "Reasons for Rank-Dependent Utility Evaluation," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 41-61, January.
    12. Kuethe, Todd H. & Hubbs, Todd, 2017. "Bankers’ Forecasts Of Farmland Values: A Qualitative And Quantitative Evaluation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 617-633, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fiechter, Chad M., 2023. "Farmland Value Expectations and Learning," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335505, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Dimitriadis, Timo & Schnaitmann, Julie, 2021. "Forecast encompassing tests for the expected shortfall," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 604-621.
    3. repec:ags:aaea22:335505 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Long Zeng & Jiazhou Yao & Ziqi Yi & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang, 2025. "Evaluating the Impact of Rural Construction Land Marketization on Rural Industrial Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Timo Dimitriadis & Andrew J. Patton & Patrick W. Schmidt, 2019. "Testing Forecast Rationality for Measures of Central Tendency," Papers 1910.12545, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    6. B. James Deaton & Chad Lawley, 2022. "A survey of literature examining farmland prices: A Canadian focus," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(2), pages 95-121, June.
    7. Amr Khafagy & Mauro Vigani, 2023. "External finance and agricultural productivity growth," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 448-472, March.
    8. Ibrahim Ayoade Adekunle & Adewale Rafiu Aregbeshola, 2025. "Evaluating the agricultural policy-productivity gap in Nigeria: a Markov-switching analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Fiechter, Chad & Kuethe, Todd, 2021. "Agricultural Lenders and Farmland Appraisers Disagreement on Farmland Value Expectations," 2021 Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition (Virtual Meeting), October 6-7, 2021 316031, Regional Research Committee NC-1177 (formerly NC-1014): Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    10. Tobias Fissler & Hajo Holzmann, 2022. "Measurability of functionals and of ideal point forecasts," Papers 2203.08635, arXiv.org.
    11. Fiechter, Chad M. & Kuethe, Todd H. & Zhang, Wendong, 2022. "Information Rigidities in Farmland Value Expectations," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322070, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Xenxo Vidal-Llana & Carlos Salort Sánchez & Vincenzo Coia & Montserrat Guillen, 2022. ""Non-Crossing Dual Neural Network: Joint Value at Risk and Conditional Tail Expectation estimations with non-crossing conditions"," IREA Working Papers 202215, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Oct 2022.
    13. Qifa Xu & Lu Chen & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2022. "Forecasting expected shortfall and value at risk with a joint elicitable mixed data sampling model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 407-421, April.
    14. Luca Merlo & Lea Petrella & Valentina Raponi, 2021. "Forecasting VaR and ES using a joint quantile regression and implications in portfolio allocation," Papers 2106.06518, arXiv.org.
    15. Nguyen, Hoang & Javed, Farrukh, 2023. "Dynamic relationship between Stock and Bond returns: A GAS MIDAS copula approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 272-292.
    16. Fortin, Alain-Philippe & Simonato, Jean-Guy & Dionne, Georges, 2023. "Forecasting expected shortfall: Should we use a multivariate model for stock market factors?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 314-331.
    17. Patrick Schmidt & Matthias Katzfuss & Tilmann Gneiting, 2021. "Interpretation of point forecasts with unknown directive," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), pages 728-743, September.
    18. Timo Dimitriadis & iaochun Liu & Julie Schnaitmann, 2023. "Encompassing Tests for Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Multistep Forecasts Based on Inference on the Boundary," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 412-444.
    19. Sander Barendse & Erik Kole & Dick van Dijk, 2023. "Backtesting Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in the Presence of Estimation Error," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 528-568.
    20. Julia S. Mehlitz & Benjamin R. Auer, 2021. "Time‐varying dynamics of expected shortfall in commodity futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 895-925, June.
    21. Sebastian Bayer & Timo Dimitriadis, 2018. "Regression Based Expected Shortfall Backtesting," Papers 1801.04112, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.