IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/360752.html

Environmental and Economic Effect of the Ecological Compensation Mechanism: Evidence from Dongjiang River, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Chengzheng
  • Hu, Hanwen
  • Zhang, Zhi Min

Abstract

The Watershed Ecological Compensation Mechanism (ECM) is an innovative policy tool to deal with environmental challenges in the context of the coordinated development of environment and economy. In this study, we utilize a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of the ECM in Dongjiang River Basin. We collect the law enforcement monitoring data of key environmental supervision units from the Jiangxi Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment, and quantify the impact of the ECM on the sewage discharge of key polluting enterprises. The results show that the implementation of the Ecological Compensation Mechanism in Dongjiang River Basin reduces the concentration of biochemical oxygen demand (about 12.48 mg/L) and suspended solids (about 6.07 mg/L) in the wastewater discharged by polluting enterprises. There is significant heterogeneity in the effect of this policy in areas with different population sizes. The implementation of the policy has a more significant effect on the pollution reduction in low-population areas. This study provides a reference for the government to optimize the formulation of compensation standards and compensation forms, and to enhance the enthusiasm of enterprises to participate through incentive measures, so as to promote the ecological governance of the Dongjiang River Basin and realize the coordinated development of economy and ecological environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Chengzheng & Hu, Hanwen & Zhang, Zhi Min, 2025. "Environmental and Economic Effect of the Ecological Compensation Mechanism: Evidence from Dongjiang River, China," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360752, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360752
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360752/files/75193_103719_105300_manuscript_Dongjiang.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.360752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenlu Shao & Guiliang Tian & Anyi Zhang & Bo Qu & Ying Liu, 2025. "The Enhancement of the Horizontal Ecological Protection Compensation Mechanism in the Yu-Lu Section of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Yanwei Sun & Shengjun Xiao & Jilong Wang & Junjie Yu & Bo Peng, 2024. "Research on Ecological Compensation Mechanism Based on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of the Tingjiang River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Susmita Dasgupta & Mainul Huq & David Wheeler & Chonghua Zhang, 2001. "Water pollution abatement by Chinese industry: cost estimates and policy implications," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 547-557.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dandan Zhao & Yonghong Jiang, 2024. "Analysis of the Spatial Effect of Carbon Emissions on Chinese Economic Resilience in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Du, Limin & Hanley, Aoife & Wei, Chu, 2015. "Estimating the marginal abatement cost curve of CO₂ emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis," Kiel Working Papers 1985, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Pargal, Sheoli & Mani, Muthukumara & Huq, Mainul, 1997. "Inspections and emissions in India : puzzling survey evidence about industrial pollution," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1810, The World Bank.
    4. Zhiyong Liu & Weiping Jia & Xianwen Jia, 2024. "Research on the Influencing Factors of Pollution Backflow Effect in River Basin," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9515-9537, June.
    5. Hettige, Hemamala & Mani, Muthukumara & Wheeler, David, 2000. "Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 445-476, August.
    6. Rita Pandey, 2005. "Estimating Sectoral and Geographical Industrial Pollution Inventories in India: Implications for Using Effluent Charge Versus Regulation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 33-61.
    7. Rakesh Kumar Jain & Surender Kumar, 2018. "Shadow price of CO2 emissions in Indian thermal power sector," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(4), pages 879-902, October.
    8. Hua Wang, 2000. "Pollution charges, community pressure, and abatement cost of industrial pollution in China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2337, The World Bank.
    9. Bishwanath Goldar & Rita Pandey, 2001. "Water pricing and abatement of industrial water pollution: study of distilleries in India," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 4(2), pages 95-113, September.
    10. David Maradan & Anatoli Vassiliev, 2005. "Marginal Costs of Carbon Dioxide Abatement: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Analysis," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 141(III), pages 377-410, September.
    11. Zeng, Siyu & Chen, Xing & Dong, Xin & Liu, Yi, 2017. "Efficiency assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants in China: Considering greenhouse gas emissions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 157-165.
    12. Huiming Xie & Xiaopeng Wang & Manhong Shen & Chu Wei, 2022. "Abatement costs of combatting industrial water pollution: convergence across Chinese provinces," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 10752-10767, September.
    13. Lan, Jing & Munro, Alistair & Liu, Zhen, 2017. "Environmental regulatory stringency and the market for abatement goods and services in China," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 105-123.
    14. Li, Xing & Hu, Zhigao & Cao, Jianhua & Xu, Xing, 2022. "The impact of environmental accountability on air pollution: A public attention perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Di Maria, Corrado & Zarkovic, Maja & Hintermann, Beat, 2020. "Are Emissions Trading Schemes Cost-effective?," Working papers 2020/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    16. Dasgupta, Susmita & Huq, Mainul & Wheeler, David, 1997. "Bending the rules : discretionary pollution control in China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1761, The World Bank.
    17. Wang, Qian & Zhu, Linke, 2021. "Environmental regulation, firm heterogeneity, and intra-industry reallocation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Fang, Jiayu & Tang, Xue & Xie, Rui & Han, Feng, 2020. "The effect of manufacturing agglomerations on smog pollution," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 92-101.
    19. Wu, Mingqin & Cao, Xun, 2021. "Greening the career incentive structure for local officials in China: Does less pollution increase the chances of promotion for Chinese local leaders?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Dasgupta, Susmita, 1999. "Opportunities for improving environmental compliance in Mexico," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2245, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.