IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/360604.html

Smallholder Preferences for Choosing Supply Chains and Output Contracts: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Nuthalapati, Chandra
  • Saha, Shree
  • Areef, Mulla

Abstract

This paper presents findings from two discrete choice experiments conducted among 836 vegetable growers across four Indian states during 2020-2021. The study aimed to elucidate farmers’ preferences within evolving food supply chains, particularly amidst the supermarket revolution. The first experiment focused on farmers’ supply chain preferences, and we found interesting results, revealing no preference for a specific place of sale, but rather a preference for credit and input support, while showing a significant aversion to delayed payment methods. The second experiment investigated their contract preferences in modern food supply chains, highlighting nuanced preferences for contract terms that minimize financial and legal risks, as well as favor pricing mechanisms that ensure a minimum base price with quality incentives. Demographic factors, initially influential, exhibited varying impacts across different models, highlighting the complex dynamics that shape farmers' decisions. Understanding these preferences is crucial for shaping effective policies and strategies that enhance market access, promote sustainable agricultural practices, and contribute to global food security and economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuthalapati, Chandra & Saha, Shree & Areef, Mulla, 2025. "Smallholder Preferences for Choosing Supply Chains and Output Contracts: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360604, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360604
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360604/files/75143_99065_105300_Discrete_choice_expt_Smallholder_preferences_for_supply_chains_and_contracts.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.360604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fanny Widadie & Jos Bijman & Jacques Trienekens, 2021. "Farmer preferences in contracting with modern retail in Indonesia: A choice experiment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 371-392, April.
    2. Camilla I.M. Andersson & Christine G.K. Chege & Elizaphan J.O. Rao & Matin Qaim, 2015. "Following Up on Smallholder Farmers and Supermarkets in Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1247-1266.
    3. Key, Nigel & Runsten, David, 1999. "Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agroprocessing Firms and the Scale of Outgrower Production," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 381-401, February.
    4. Rao, N. Chandrasekhara & Sutradhar, Rajib & Reardon, Thomas, 2018. "Inclusiveness, Technology and Profitability in Supermarkets: SUR Model Results from Semi-Arid Region," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(03), July.
    5. Hudson Darren & Lusk Jayson, 2004. "Risk and Transactions Cost in Contracting: Results from a Choice-Based Experiment," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuomiao Xie & Shiqi Yuan & Jinjing Zhu & Weiming Li, 2023. "Contract farming led by a seed enterprise and incentives to produce high quality: Which contract design performs best?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1173-1198, October.
    2. Ton, Giel & Vellema, Wytse & Desiere, Sam & Weituschat, Sophia & D'Haese, Marijke, 2018. "Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 46-64.
    3. Alper Demirdogen, 2023. "Before Privatization There was Its Impact: Sugar Factories in Turkey," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 62(2), pages 199-218, March.
    4. Ruml, Anette & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts in the African small farm sector: Insights from oil palm production in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Nuthalapati, Chandra S.R. & Sutradhar, Rajib & Reardon, Thomas & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Supermarket procurement and farmgate prices in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Swinnen, Johan & Kuijpers, Rob, 2020. "Inclusive Value Chains to Accelerate Poverty Reduction in Africa," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 31809214, The World Bank.
    7. Escobal, Javier A. & Cavero, Denice, 2012. "Transaction Costs, Institutional Arrangements and Inequality Outcomes: Potato Marketing by Small Producers in Rural Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 329-341.
    8. Fanny Widadie & Jos Bijman & Jacques Trienekens, 2021. "Farmer preferences in contracting with modern retail in Indonesia: A choice experiment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 371-392, April.
    9. Meilin Ma & Richard J. Sexton, 2021. "Modern agricultural value chains and the future of smallholder farming systems," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 591-606, July.
    10. Yu, Xiaohua & Abler, David G. & Peng, Chao, 2008. "Dancing with the Dragon Heads: Enforcement, Innovations and Efficiency of Contracts between Agricultural Processors and Farmers in China," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6144, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Handschuch, Christina & Wollni, Meike & Villalobos, Pablo, 2013. "Adoption of food safety and quality standards among Chilean raspberry producers – Do smallholders benefit?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 64-73.
    12. Xolile Mamba, Tangetile, 2016. "The role of contracts in improving access to credit in the smallholder livestock sector of Swaziland," Research Theses 243472, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. repec:lic:licosd:21408 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Chandra Sekhara Rao Nuthalapati & Yogesh Bhatt & Susanto K Beero, 2020. "Is the Electronic Market the Way Forward to Overcome Market Failures?," IEG Working Papers 387, Institute of Economic Growth.
    15. Houssa, Romain & Verpoorten, Marijke, 2015. "The Unintended Consequence of an Export Ban: Evidence from Benin’s Shrimp Sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 138-150.
    16. Lemeilleur, Sylvaine, . "Smallholder Compliance with Private Standard Certification: The Case of GlobalGAP Adoption by Mango Producers in Peru," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22.
    17. CHINAKI Christina & SERGAKI Panagiota, 2018. "Potentials and Pitfalls of Contract farming through Agricultural Cooperatives in Greece," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 27(1), pages 111-122.
    18. Neven, David & Katjiuongua, Hikuepi & Adjosoediro, Ingrid & Reardon, Thomas & Chuzu, Pia Nwanza & Tembo, Gelson & Ndiyoi, Mukelabai, 2006. "Food Sector Transformation and Standards in Zambia: Smallholder Farmer Participation and Growth in the Dairy Sector," Staff Paper Series 11701, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    19. Rob Kuijpers & Johan Swinnen, 2016. "Value Chains and Technology Transfer to Agriculture in Developing and Emerging Economies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1403-1418.
    20. Li, X. & Guo, H. & Li, L., 2018. "Do Product Attributes affect Farmer's Contract Farming Participation? Evidence from Vegetable Production in China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277154, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Federica Di Marcantonio & Pavel Ciaian & Vicente Castellanos, 2018. "Unfair trading practices in the dairy farm sector: Evidence from selected EU regions," JRC Research Reports JRC112770, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.