IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/prp/micp17/313-329.html

A Comparative Study of the Supply Chain Key Factors Differentiated by Nearshore Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Shahriare Mahmood

    (University of Oulu, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Finland)

  • Hanna Kropsu-Vehkaperä

    (University of Oulu, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Finland)

  • Pekka Kess

    (University of Oulu, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Finland)

Abstract

The impact of globalization has led the global brands to offshore production, but the everincreasing demand of fashion products and the need for replenishment in quick succession demands for manufacturing near to market. Moreover, in-season purchase is also favoured as a curtailed risk where small volume is needed to be produced in short interval. As traditional offshore production setup of fashion supply chain is not eligible to fulfil the agile demand, near shore production could be effective to meet the need. Albeit it is a known phenomenon that near shore manufacturing is not as cost effective, but it could be lucrative while considering the big picture. Different operational setup has an impact on supply chain arrangement where the key factors have difference in priority. The aim of this paper is to analyse the key factors and to study the difference in importance level of those supply chain factors. Pre-set supply chain key factor’s impact is analysed for two different supply chains where one has its own production operation for the final product and another is outsourcing completely. The collected data from both the cases is analysed through analytic hierarchy process to understand the priorities of the values. Eventually it has found that the supply chain factors are nearly equally important in both cases, but still there are differences in importance among some factors. Although both the cases have few common features, which is ideal for comparison, but it could be beneficial to study few more similar cases to establish the phenomenon. The exclusivity of this research is to examine the significance of nearshore manufacturing and point out the important considerations in different cases. In particular, it has taken into consideration also the complicacy of textile supply chain for selecting the key factors. The intention is to add some knowledge on selection of supply chain strategy and open up the possibility to rethink the existing strategy. Particularly it is important for those who wants to endorse agile strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahriare Mahmood & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkaperä & Pekka Kess, 2017. "A Comparative Study of the Supply Chain Key Factors Differentiated by Nearshore Manufacturing," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    • Handle: RePEc:prp:micp17:313-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISBN/978-961-7023-71-8/30.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Persson, Fredrik & Olhager, Jan, 2002. "Performance simulation of supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 231-245, June.
    2. Christerson, Brad & Appelbaum, Richard P., 1995. "Global and local subcontracting: Space, ethnicity, and the organization of apparel production," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 1363-1374, August.
    3. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Giancarlo Medeiros Pereira & Miriam Borchardt & Rosnaldo Inácio da Silva & Cláudia Viviane Viegas, 2015. "A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 4917-4926, August.
    4. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Vaziri & Mehran Mohsenzadeh & Jafar Habibi, 2016. "TBDQ: A Pragmatic Task-Based Method to Data Quality Assessment and Improvement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Eric Sucky, 2006. "Kontraktlogistik—Ein stochastisch dynamischer Planungsansatz zur Logistikdienstleisterauswahl," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 131-153, June.
    3. Reza Banai, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    4. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    5. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Alu Si & Li Na, 2018. "The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Niklas Egels-Zandén & Peter Hyllman, 2007. "Evaluating Strategies for Negotiating Workers’ Rights in Transnational Corporations: The Effects of Codes of Conduct and Global Agreements on Workplace Democracy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 207-223, December.
    8. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Guilan Kong & Lili Jiang & Xiaofeng Yin & Tianbing Wang & Dong-Ling Xu & Jian-Bo Yang & Yonghua Hu, 2018. "Combining principal component analysis and the evidential reasoning approach for healthcare quality assessment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 679-699, December.
    10. Hu, Mingming & Ren, Peiyu & Lan, Jibin & Wang, Jun & Zheng, Weimin, 2014. "Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 771-773.
    11. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    12. Ngan, Sue Lin & How, Bing Shen & Teng, Sin Yong & Leong, Wei Dong & Loy, Adrian Chun Minh & Yatim, Puan & Promentilla, Michael Angelo B. & Lam, Hon Loong, 2020. "A hybrid approach to prioritize risk mitigation strategies for biomass polygeneration systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    13. Paul, Swarup & Sarkar, Bijan & Bose, P.K., 2015. "Eclectic decision for the selection of tree borne oil (TBO) as alternative fuel for internal combustion engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 256-263.
    14. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    15. Eklund, Patrik & Rusinowska, Agnieszka & De Swart, Harrie, 2007. "Consensus reaching in committees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 185-193, April.
    16. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    17. Ya-Ching Yeh & Chia-Chun Hsiao, 2012. "An Evaluation of Core Competence on Knowledge Management for Elementary Schools’ Teachers: A Case Study of Remote Rural Area in Taiwan," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 3(9), pages 303-312.
    18. Renaud, J. & Thibault, J. & Lanouette, R. & Kiss, L.N. & Zaras, K. & Fonteix, C., 2007. "Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods in a high yield pulping process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1418-1432, March.
    19. Raimonda BublienÄ— & Irina Vinogradova & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Salvatore Monni, 2019. "Legal form determination for the development of clusters' activities," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(3), pages 244-258, September.
    20. Ricardo Ribeiro Nascimento & Eduardo Antonio Gomes Marques & Gustavo Ferreira Simões, 2023. "Application of the AHP method for prioritizing actions to reduce risk associated with gravitational mass movements in areas along the margins of watercourses of the city of Rio Branco, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1591-1613, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prp:micp17:313-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hippocampus.si .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.