IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/bulimm/v18y2018p85-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Of Logistics Service Providers. A Conceptual Framework And Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Rafał Haffer

    (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń)

Abstract

Currently, intensified globalization and consequent competitive pressures have reemphasized the importance of logistics service providers (LSPs) in managing logistics processes as well as customer and supplier relationships within the supply chain management. This requires them to develop their business performance measurement systems (BPMSs) towards supply chain performance measurement systems (SCPMSs) a scope of which depends on the LSP advancement thus whether it operates as a third-party logistics (3PL) provider, a lead logistics provider (LLP) or a fourth party logistics (4PL) provider. However research on the topic of LSP SCPMSs remains scarce as it usually concentrates on SCPMSs of the focal companies orchestrating the whole supply chain (SC). At the same time LSPs have an exceptional impact on SC performance as the operators connecting the SC links, and since they operate within a portion of or the whole supply chains of the sectors they serve, they need to develop not only the internal BPMSs,but also the external SCPMSs. The present paper aims to consolidate knowledge on supply chain performance measurement systems perceived and developed from the perspective of LSPs and makes a three-fold contribution to the discussion. First, it proposes the LSP SCPMS definition. Second, it develops a research framework that distinguishes key issues which need consideration when examining the LSP SCPMSs, namely the LSP advancement, the LSP SCPMS components such as applied subsystems, approaches, ICT technologies and metrics including methods for metric selection followed by the LSP SCPMS adoption consequences, characteristics and life cycle and finally contextual factors constituting stimuli and barriers for the LSP SCPMS development. Then a research agenda is presented to guide future research on the LSP SCPMSs. This work is designed to inspire researchers to continue expanding the knowledge about how to develop high-performing SCPMSs for different supply chain players including LSPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafał Haffer, 2018. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Of Logistics Service Providers. A Conceptual Framework And Research Agenda," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 85-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:18:y:2018:p:85-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement18/blimm1806.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F. & Randall, Taylor, 2003. "Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 715-741.
    2. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2011. "Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 441-452, June.
    3. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 1996. "Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 136-150, April.
    4. Jayaram, Jayanth & Tan, Keah-Choon, 2010. "Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 262-271, June.
    5. Stephan Duschek, 2004. "Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(1), pages 53-73.
    6. Persson, Fredrik & Olhager, Jan, 2002. "Performance simulation of supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 231-245, June.
    7. Lai, Kee-Hung & Ngai, E. W. T. & Cheng, T. C. E., 2004. "An empirical study of supply chain performance in transport logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 321-331, February.
    8. John A. Mathews, 2003. "Competitive dynamics and economic learning: an extended resource-based view," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(1), pages 115-145, February.
    9. Braz, Renata Gomes Frutuoso & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Martins, Roberto Antonio, 2011. "Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 751-760, October.
    10. Stephan Duschek, 2004. "Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 53-73.
    11. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    12. Krakovics, Fabio & Eugenio Leal, José & Mendes Jr., Paulo & Lorenzo Santos, Rafael, 2008. "Defining and calibrating performance indicators of a 4PL in the chemical industry in Brazil," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 502-514, October.
    13. Najmi, Ali & Gholamian, Mohammad Reza & Makui, Ahamad, 2013. "Supply chain performance models: A literature review on approaches,techniques, and criteria," Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (FGV EAESP), vol. 6(2), December.
    14. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    15. Seong-Jong Joo & Gawon Yun, 2017. "Examining the influence of information system ratings on the performance of 3PL companies," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(3), pages 316-328.
    16. Richard P. Rumelt, 1991. "How much does industry matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 167-185, March.
    17. Celik Parkan & Jiamin Wang, 2007. "Gauging the performance of a supply chain," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 141-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinhao Xie & Chao Chen, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Supply chain and logistics optimization management for international trading enterprises using IoT-based economic logistics model," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 711-724, December.
    2. Iwona Wasielewska-Marszalkowska, 2021. "Identification of Innovativeness Provided by Logistics Service Providers," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 40-52.
    3. Rafal Haffer, 2021. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System of Logistics Service Providers vs. Supply Chain Performance: A Conceptual Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 78-97.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafal Haffer, 2021. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System of Logistics Service Providers vs. Supply Chain Performance: A Conceptual Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 78-97.
    2. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg, 2012. "A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 311-326.
    3. John Hamilton, 2020. "The Strategic Change Matrix and Business Sustainability across COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Yeung, Kwong & Zhou, Honggeng & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The impact of third-party logistics providers' capabilities on exporters' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 741-753.
    5. Seiler, A. & Papanagnou, C. & Scarf, P., 2020. "On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Reuter, Ute, 2011. "Der ressourcenbasierte Ansatz als theoretischer Bezugsrahmen: Grundlagen, Theoriebausteine und Prozessorientierung," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 3/2011, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    7. Reuter, Ute, 2011. "Der relationale ressourcenbasierte Ansatz als Weiterentwicklung des ressourcenbasierten Ansatzes unter Einbezug externer Ressourcen," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 4/2011, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    8. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2010. "Das Elend des Kompetenzbegriffs: Kompetenzkonstrukte in der aktuellen Unternehmenstheorie," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2010, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Eymann, Torsten (Ed.), 2011. "Tagungsband zum Doctoral Consortium der WI 2011 [Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium of the Wirtschaftsinformatik 2011]," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 51, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    10. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Yi-Min Chen, 2008. "How Much Does Country Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(4), pages 404-435, October.
    12. Pettus, Michael L. & Kor, Yasemin Y. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "A Theory of Change in Turbulent Environments: The Sequencing of Dynamic Capabilities Following Industry Deregulation," Working Papers 07-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    13. Markus Menz & Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & David J. Collis & Nicolai J. Foss & Robert E. Hoskisson & John E. Prescott, 2021. "Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1695-1720, November.
    14. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    15. Eleonora Bartoloni & Maurizio Baussola, 2015. "Persistent Product Innovation and Market-oriented Behaviour: the Impact on Firms' Performance," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1505, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    16. Phebo D. Wibbens, 2023. "A formal framework for the RBV: Resource dynamics as a Markov process," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1562-1586, June.
    17. David B. Audretsch & Donald F. Kuratko & Albert N. Link, 2016. "Dynamic entrepreneurship and technology-based innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 603-620, July.
    18. Ana Villar & César Camisón & Montserrat Boronat, 2007. "Technical Strategic Alliances And Performance: The Mediating Effect Of Knowledge ¿Based Competencies," Working Papers. Serie EC 2007-11, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    19. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 111-132, December.
    20. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:18:y:2018:p:85-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.