IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pkk/sfyr16/57-64.html

Reappraisal of Austrian Business Confidence Survey 2015 for Mainland China

In: Proceedings of FIKUSZ '16

Author

Listed:
  • Haas Franz

Abstract

A statistical reappraisal of the Austrian Business Confidence Survey 2015 regarding the legal entity has been done. Various methods like inferencestatistics or factor analysis have been applied. Joint Ventures face challenges within the company. They face to some extent cultural differences between management and workforce. These are challenges within the company. WFOEs by contrast face challenges involving relations and situations in a Chinese environment. These are challenges outside the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Haas Franz, 2016. "Reappraisal of Austrian Business Confidence Survey 2015 for Mainland China," Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2016, in: Regina Zsuzsánna Reicher (ed.),Proceedings of FIKUSZ '16, pages 57-64, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:pkk:sfyr16:57-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/sites/default/files/06_Haas.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald L. Wasserstein & Nicole A. Lazar, 2016. "The ASA's Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 129-133, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fukś Maksymilian & Wiejaczka Łukasz, 2025. "Climatic Determinants of Changes in the Ice Regime of Carpathian Rivers," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 131-143.
    2. Grant G. Thompson & Lynn A. Maguire & Tracey J. Regan, 2018. "Evaluation of Two Approaches to Defining Extinction Risk under the U.S. Endangered Species Act," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 1009-1035, May.
    3. Jyotirmoy Sarkar, 2018. "Will P†Value Triumph over Abuses and Attacks?," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(4), pages 66-71, July.
    4. Gunter, Ulrich & Önder, Irem & Smeral, Egon, 2019. "Scientific value of econometric tourism demand studies," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Karmakar, Bisheswar & Chakrabortty, Sankha & Kumar, Ramesh & Halder, Gopinath, 2025. "Biodiesel synthesis from Ricinus communis and Pongamia pinnata oil blends by injecting superheated methanol – isopropanol mixtures: Optimization through CCD and ANN approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Simon French, 2024. "Whose Judgement? Reflections on Elicitation in Bayesian Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 143-159, September.
    7. James Nicholson & Sean Mccusker, 2016. "Damaging the Case for Improving Social Science Methodology through Misrepresentation: Re-Asserting Confidence in Hypothesis Testing as a Valid Scientific Process," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 136-147, May.
    8. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Eugenio Melilli & Piero Veronese, 2024. "Confidence distributions and hypothesis testing," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3789-3820, August.
    10. Segurado, Pedro & Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano & Ferreira, Teresa & Branco, Paulo, 2022. "Stressor gradient coverage affects interaction identification," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    11. Uwe Hassler & Marc‐Oliver Pohle, 2022. "Unlucky Number 13? Manipulating Evidence Subject to Snooping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(2), pages 397-410, August.
    12. Douglas, Evan J. & Shepherd, Dean A. & Prentice, Catherine, 2020. "Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    13. Hirschauer, Norbert & Grüner, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Claudia & Jantsch, Antje, 2020. "Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14, pages 71-91.
    14. Dr. Olivier Gatete, 2025. "Statistics: The Art and Science of Learning from Data," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 285-301, July.
    15. Kim, Dong-Min & Chin, Jun-Woo & Kim, Jae-Hyun & Lim, Myung-Seop, 2023. "Analytical temperature estimation process of the air supply system of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack in fuel cell electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    16. Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly & Michiel Bliemer & Angelo Guevara & Ricardo Daziano & Thijs Dekker, 2025. "Statistical significance in choice modelling: computation, usage and reporting," Papers 2506.05996, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    17. Laxman, Daniel J. & Higginbotham, Brian J. & Bradford, Kay, 2019. "Predictors of attrition and attendance in a fatherhood education program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 287-297.
    18. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & Ralf, Kirsten, 2018. "Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 65-101.
    19. Andrew Y. Chen, 2022. "Most claimed statistical findings in cross-sectional return predictability are likely true," Papers 2206.15365, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    20. Oliver Schilke & Sheen S. Levine & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2019. "Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 232-234, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkk:sfyr16:57-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexandra Vécsey The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Alexandra Vécsey to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gkbmfhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.