IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Price and Welfare Implications of Current Conflicts between the Agricultural Policies of the United States and the European Community

In: Issues in US-EC Trade Relations


  • Dermot Hayes
  • Andrew Schmitz


No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Dermot Hayes & Andrew Schmitz, 1988. "The Price and Welfare Implications of Current Conflicts between the Agricultural Policies of the United States and the European Community," NBER Chapters,in: Issues in US-EC Trade Relations, pages 65-100 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:5956

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Sampson, Gary P & Snape, Richard H, 1980. "Effects of the EEC's Variable Import Levies," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(5), pages 1026-1040, October.
    2. Koester, Ulrich, 1982. "Policy options for the grain economy of the European Community: implications for developing countries," Research reports 35, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Helmar, Michael D. & Stephens, Deborah L. & Eswaramoorthy, K. & Brown, D. Scott & Hayes, Dermot J. & Young, Robert & Meyers, William H., 1992. "An Analysis of the Cap Reform," Staff Reports 244296, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    2. E. Wesley & F. Peterson & Clare Lyons, 1989. "The perpetual agricultural policy crisis in the European community," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 6(1), pages 11-21, December.
    3. Kim, Tae-Kyun, 1989. "The factor bias of technical change and technology adoption under uncertainty," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010138, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:5956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.