Expected Outcomes from the Bali Ministerial Conference: The view from Myanmar
Resulting from the collaborative efforts of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), the Universitas Pelita Harapan (UPH) and the World Trade Institute (WTI) at the University of Bern, this policy research initiative has sought to encourage comparative scholarship from ERIA’s Regional Institution Network (RIN) members1 on some of the key questions arising from the forthcoming WTO Ministerial gathering
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Chapters with number
2012-rpr-31-11.||Handle:|| RePEc:era:chaptr:2012-rpr-31-11||Contact details of provider:|| Postal: The ASEAN Secretariat Mezzanine Floor, 70A Jl.Sisingamangaraja, Jakarta 12110|
Web page: http://www.eria.org/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Matthew Kennedy, 2011. "Two Single Undertakings--Can the WTO Implement the Results of a Round?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 77-120, March.
- Julien Chaisse & Mitsuo Matsushita, 2013. "Maintaining the WTO's Supremacy in the International Trade Order: A Proposal to Refine and Revise the Role of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 9-36, March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:chaptr:2012-rpr-31-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hiroshi Okasaki)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.