IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pra935.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Joanna Rachubik

Personal Details

First Name:Joanna
Middle Name:
Last Name:Rachubik
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pra935
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/view/joanna-rachubik

Affiliation

Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
Uniwersytet Warszawski

Warszawa, Poland
http://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/
RePEc:edi:fesuwpl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Ewa Zawojska & Andrea Baldin & Joanna Rachubik, 2023. "Reliability of international benefit transfer in cultural economics: Non-market valuation of theater in Denmark and Poland," Working Papers 2023-19, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  2. Joanna Rachubik, 2023. "Framing-induced emotions affect performance in simple cognitive tasks under risk," Working Papers 2023-22, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  3. Shahriar Akhavan & Maciej Grzenda & Anna Nicińska & Joanna Rachubik & Satia Rożynek & Jakub Zawieska & Grzegorz Kula, 2023. "Patterns in the mobility and ownership of private cars and alternative transport modes: the focus on Warsaw and Poland," Working Papers 2023-18, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  4. Michał Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2021. "Stability of the Representativeness Heuristic: Further Evidence from Choices Between Lottery Tickets," Working Papers 2021-24, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  5. Raman Kachurka & Michał W. Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2021. "Persuasive messages will not raise COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Evidence from a nation-wide online experiment," Working Papers 2021-07, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  6. Raman Kachurka & Michał Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2020. "What do lab experiments tell us about the real world? The case of lotteries with extreme payoffs," Working Papers 2020-03, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  7. Michal Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2019. "The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00693, The Field Experiments Website.
  8. Michał Wiktor Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2019. "The limitations of the representativeness heuristic: further evidence from choices between lottery tickets," Working Papers 2019-11, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  9. Michal Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2018. "Verifying the representativeness heuristic: A field experiment with real-life lottery tickets," Natural Field Experiments 00699, The Field Experiments Website.

Articles

  1. Joanna Rachubik & Dorota Mirowska-Wierzbicka & Wojciech Zawadzki & Maciej Wilamowski & Krzysztof Fiok & Wojciech Maciejewski & Mateusz Szczurek, 2021. "Wspolczesne mechanizmy aukcyjne na potrzeby rynku mediowego (Modern Auction Mechanisms for the Media Market)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(35), pages 61-75.
  2. Raman Kachurka & Michał Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2021. "State lottery in the lab: an experiment in external validity," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(4), pages 1242-1266, December.
  3. Krawczyk, Michał Wiktor & Rachubik, Joanna, 2019. "The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 51-57, January.
  4. Krawczyk, Michał Wiktor & Rachubik, Joanna, 2019. "The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 51-57, January.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Raman Kachurka & Michał W. Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2021. "Persuasive messages will not raise COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Evidence from a nation-wide online experiment," Working Papers 2021-07, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

    Cited by:

    1. Maria Ganczak & Oskar Pasek & Łukasz Duda-Duma & Julia Komorzycka & Karol Nowak & Marcin Korzeń, 2021. "A Peer-Based Educational Intervention Effects on SARS-CoV-2 Knowledge and Attitudes among Polish High-School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.

  2. Michal Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2019. "The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00693, The Field Experiments Website.

    Cited by:

    1. Bouteska, Ahmed, 2019. "The effect of investor sentiment on market reactions to financial earnings restatements: Lessons from the United States," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    2. Irenaeus Wolff, 2021. "The Lottery Player's Fallacy Why Labels Predict Strategic Choices," TWI Research Paper Series 124, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    3. Tariq Mahadeen & Kostas Galanakis & Elpida Samara & Pavlos Kilintzis, 2021. "Heuristics and Evidences Decision (HeED) Making: a Case Study in a Systemic Model for Transforming Decision Making from Heuristics-Based to Evidenced-Based," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1668-1693, December.
    4. Michał Wiktor Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2019. "The limitations of the representativeness heuristic: further evidence from choices between lottery tickets," Working Papers 2019-11, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

  3. Michal Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2018. "Verifying the representativeness heuristic: A field experiment with real-life lottery tickets," Natural Field Experiments 00699, The Field Experiments Website.

    Cited by:

    1. Raman Kachurka & Michał Wiktor Krawczyk, 2020. "Lottery "strategies": monetizing players' behavioral biases," Working Papers 2020-29, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

Articles

  1. Krawczyk, Michał Wiktor & Rachubik, Joanna, 2019. "The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 51-57, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Krawczyk, Michał Wiktor & Rachubik, Joanna, 2019. "The representativeness heuristic and the choice of lottery tickets: A field experiment," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 51-57, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Bouteska, Ahmed, 2019. "The effect of investor sentiment on market reactions to financial earnings restatements: Lessons from the United States," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    2. Irenaeus Wolff, 2021. "The Lottery Player's Fallacy Why Labels Predict Strategic Choices," TWI Research Paper Series 124, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    3. Tariq Mahadeen & Kostas Galanakis & Elpida Samara & Pavlos Kilintzis, 2021. "Heuristics and Evidences Decision (HeED) Making: a Case Study in a Systemic Model for Transforming Decision Making from Heuristics-Based to Evidenced-Based," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1668-1693, December.
    4. Michał Wiktor Krawczyk & Joanna Rachubik, 2019. "The limitations of the representativeness heuristic: further evidence from choices between lottery tickets," Working Papers 2019-11, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 8 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (6) 2018-01-29 2019-07-08 2020-03-02 2020-04-27 2022-12-12 2023-09-25. Author is listed
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (5) 2018-01-29 2019-07-08 2020-03-02 2022-12-12 2023-09-25. Author is listed
  3. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (3) 2018-01-29 2019-07-08 2022-12-12. Author is listed
  4. NEP-TRA: Transition Economics (2) 2023-08-28 2023-08-28. Author is listed
  5. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2023-08-28
  6. NEP-ENV: Environmental Economics (1) 2023-08-28
  7. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (1) 2023-09-25
  8. NEP-RMG: Risk Management (1) 2020-03-02
  9. NEP-SPO: Sports and Economics (1) 2022-12-12
  10. NEP-TRE: Transport Economics (1) 2023-08-28
  11. NEP-URE: Urban and Real Estate Economics (1) 2023-08-28

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Joanna Rachubik should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.