IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/zewexp/337415.html

The future ratio: A new metric for forward-looking fiscal policy in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Bohne, Albrecht
  • Heinemann, Friedrich
  • Heinzel, Christian

Abstract

This study introduces the Future Ratio, a novel indicator designed to assess the future orientation of public expenditure in EU Member States. While traditional investment ratios focus primarily on tangible capital formation, the Future Ratio encompasses a broader concept of capital, including human capital, technical knowledge, natural capital, and growth-relevant infrastructure. By capturing expenditures that strengthen long-term capacities and performance, the Future Ratio provides a more nuanced measure of how fiscal policy serves the interests of future generations. Using Eurostat's COFOG data, we calculate the Future Ratio for all EU countries from 2001 to 2023. A systematic weighting algorithm classifies spending categories based on well-defined criteria, allowing differentiation between present-oriented and future-oriented expenditures. This approach accommodates the spectrum of future orientation across various policy areas while maintaining comparability across countries and over time. Our findings reveal both positive and negative trends. After 2015, average future-oriented spending in the EU increased, with temporary setbacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a potential learning effect from the euro area debt crisis. Cross-country comparisons highlight significant heterogeneity: Northern and Eastern European countries generally exhibit higher Future Ratios, whereas Southern European countries, along with major economies such as Germany and France, display only average or below-average levels. Correlation analyses indicate that high debt levels strongly constrain future-oriented spending, while factors such as compliance with Stability and Growth Pact rules and performance-based budgeting are moderately associated with higher Future Ratios. Conversely, demographic structure, education levels, voter turnout, and procedural fiscal rules show little systematic relationship. These results underscore the critical role of fiscal space in enabling governments to invest in the future. High-debt countries appear trapped in a "bad equilibrium," where debt servicing crowds out investment in long-term priorities. Overall, the Future Ratio provides a tool for national and European policymakers and researchers to monitor the alignment of government expenditure with long-term societal challenges, offering a complementary perspective to conventional fiscal indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Bohne, Albrecht & Heinemann, Friedrich & Heinzel, Christian, 2025. "The future ratio: A new metric for forward-looking fiscal policy in Europe," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 337415.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zewexp:337415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/337415/1/1960841491.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ludger Schuknecht & Holger Zemanek, 2021. "Public expenditures and the risk of social dominance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 95-120, July.
    2. Wang, Mei & Rieger, Marc Oliver & Hens, Thorsten, 2016. "How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 115-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andersen, Torben M. & Bhattacharya, Joydeep & Gestsson, Marias H., 2021. "Pareto-improving transition to fully funded pensions under myopia," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(2), pages 169-212, June.
    2. Goran Calic & Moren Lévesque & Anton Shevchenko, 2024. "On why women-owned businesses take more time to secure microloans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 917-938, October.
    3. Li, Cong & Chen, Danlei & Wu, Jingxian & Liu, Qiqi, 2025. "Effectiveness of direct and indirect time preference elicitation methods across domains in predicting health behaviors: Evidence from Rural China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Jindrich Matousek & Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova, 2022. "Individual discount rates: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(1), pages 318-358, February.
    5. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2018. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(4), pages 1645-1692.
    6. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2019. "How related are risk preferences and time preferences?," CLTS Working Papers 4/19, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 16 Oct 2019.
    7. He, Rui & Dai, Yuhang & Jin, Jianjun & Yan, Jubo & Liu, Dan, 2025. "The effects of time preferences on farmers’ energy-saving and emission-reducing behavior of agricultural machinery in a gain-loss dual context: Evidence from rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    8. Zokaei Ashtiani, Amin & Dudek, Thomas & Rieger, Marc Oliver, 2020. "Happy savers and happy spenders: An experimental study comparing US Americans and Germans," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Florian Haelg & Niklas Potrafke & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2022. "The determinants of social expenditures in OECD countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 233-261, December.
    10. Nieminen, Mika, 2022. "Cross-country variation in patience, persistent current account imbalances and the external wealth of nations," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Sawosri, Arieska Wening & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2020. "Risk and time preferences of farmers in India and Indonesia," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 32, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    12. Arawatari, Ryo & Ono, Tetsuo, 2021. "Public debt rule breaking by time-inconsistent voters," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Palenik Marcin, 2021. "The effect of uncertainty on negative discounting," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 57(4), pages 287-298, December.
    14. Jutao Zeng & Jie Lyu, 2023. "Simultaneous Decisions to Undertake Off-Farm Work and Straw Return: The Role of Cognitive Ability," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. S. Basiglio & A. Ricci & M. Rossi, 2025. "Entrepreneurs’ impatience and digital technologies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 2035-2060, April.
    16. Astghik Mavisakalyan & Yashar Tarverdi & Clas Weber, 2022. "Heaven can wait: future tense and religiosity," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 833-860, July.
    17. Bohne Albrecht & Heinemann Friedrich & Niebel Thomas & Thöne Michael, 2024. "Die Zukunftsquote: ein neuer Kompass für den Bundeshaushalt," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 113-129.
    18. Posada-Borrero, Catalina & Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss & Lavaine, Emmanuelle & Roussel, Sébastien, 2026. "Small steps in the right direction: Preferences of small-scale farmers for sustainable cattle systems in Guaviare, Colombian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    19. Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Sutter, Matthias, 2021. "Collective intertemporal decisions and heterogeneity in groups," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 131-147.
    20. Francisco José Areal, 2024. "Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Soil Quality Protection and Improvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zewexp:337415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zemande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.