IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/wtosps/6.html

Market Access: Unfinished Business - Post Uruguay Round Inventory and Issues

Author

Listed:
  • WTO Economic Research and Analysis Division

Abstract

The study profiles post-Uruguay Round market access conditions in three areas - industrial tariffs, agriculture and services - the latter two of which are already the subject of ongoing negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • WTO Economic Research and Analysis Division, 2001. "Market Access: Unfinished Business - Post Uruguay Round Inventory and Issues," WTO Special Studies, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division, volume 6, number 6.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wtosps:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/107061/1/wto-special-study_6_e.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tuthill, Lee, 0. "The GATS and new rules for regulators," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(9-10), pages 783-798, November.
    2. Francois, Joseph & Martin, William, 1995. "Multilateral Trade Rules and the Expected Cost of Protection," CEPR Discussion Papers 1214, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Skully, David W., 1999. "The Economics Of Trq Administration," Working Papers 14584, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Laird, Sam, 1998. "Multilateral approaches to market access negotiations," WTO Staff Working Papers TPRD-98-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Martin,Will & Winters,L. Alan (ed.), 1996. "The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521586016.
    6. Rudolf Adlung, 1999. "Liberalizing trade in services: from Marrakech to Seattle," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 34(5), pages 211-222, September.
    7. Jeffrey J. Schott (ed.), 1998. "Launching New Global Trade Talks: An Action Agenda," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number sr12, October.
    8. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13828 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Thomas W. Hertel, 2000. "Potential gains from reducing trade barriers in manufacturing, services and agriculture," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 77-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adlung, Rolf, 2005. "Public services and the GATS," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2005-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, 2007. "Offshoring, Outsourcing, and Production Relocation—Labor-Market Effects in the OECD Countries and Developing Asia," Working Paper Series WP07-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Bacchetta., 2007. "Market Access: Unfinished Business: Post-Uruguay Round Inventory and Issues," Working Papers id:1166, eSocialSciences.
    2. Elena Ianchovichina, 2001. "Trade Liberalization in China’s Accession to WTO," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 16, pages 421-445.
    3. Ji Chou & Shiu-Tung Wang & Kun-Ming Chen & Nai-Fong Kuo, 2003. "Taiwan's Accession into the WTO and Trade in Services: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: Trade in Services in the Asia-Pacific Region, pages 99-136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Adlung, Rudolf, 2004. "The GATS turns ten: A preliminary stocktaking," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2004-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Joseph Francois & Will Martin, 2003. "Formula Approaches for Market Access Negotiations," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Joseph Francois, 2002. "Formulas for Success? Some Options for Market Access Negotiations," International Trade 0210001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Christen, Elisabeth & Francois, Joseph & Hoekman, Bernard, 2013. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Market Access in Services," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1601-1643, Elsevier.
    8. Bernard Hoekman, 2000. "The next round of services negotiations: identifying priorities and options," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 31-52.
    9. Joseph Francois & Will Martin & Vlad Manole, 2005. "Choosing formulas for market access negotiations: efficiency and market access considerations," Chapters, in: Sisira Jayasuriya (ed.), Trade Policy Reforms and Development, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Konan, Denise Eby & Maskus, Keith E., 2006. "Quantifying the impact of services liberalization in a developing country," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 142-162, October.
    11. Aaditya Mattoo, 2003. "Shaping Future Rules for Trade in Services: Lessons from the GATS," NBER Chapters, in: Trade in Services in the Asia-Pacific Region, pages 47-78, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Sébastien Jean & David Laborde & Will Martin, 2008. "Choosing Sensitive Agricultural Products in Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 2008-18, CEPII research center.
    13. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    14. J. Mutti & R. Sampson & B. Yeung, 2000. "The effects of the Uruguay round: empirical evidence from U.S. industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, January.
    15. Dixit, Praveen M. & Josling, Timothy E. & Blandford, David, 2001. "The Current Wto Agricultural Negotiations: Options For Progress; Synthesis," Commissioned Papers 14623, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    16. Walmsley, Terrie L. & Hertel, Thomas W. & Ianchovichina, Elena, 2001. "Assessing the Impact of China’s WTO Accession on Foreign Ownership," Conference papers 330941, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Trade Liberalization, Agriculture, and Poverty in Low-income Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. G. Alenka Guzmán Chávez. & Hortensia Gómez Víquez. & Francisco López Herrera., 2018. "Patentes y crecimiento económico, el caso de México durante el TLCAN," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 0(2), pages 177-204, Agosto.
    19. Parakrama Samaratunga & Manoj Thibbotuwawa, 2006. "Customs Mapping and Analysis of South Asian Agricultural Trade Liberalization Effort," Working Papers 2606, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), an initiative of UNESCAP and IDRC, Canada..
    20. Götz, Christian & Heckelei, Thomas & Rudloff, Bettina, 2010. "What makes countries initiate WTO disputes on food-related issues?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 154-162, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wtosps:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wtoerch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.