IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/46702.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Energy Scenarios 2030. Model Projections of Energy Demand as a Basis to Quantify Austria's Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Kratena

    (WIFO)

  • Ina Meyer
  • Mark Sommer

    (WIFO)

Abstract

The present study develops three energy scenarios for the Austrian economy up to 2030. These scenarios incorporate existing measures and policies on energy use and climate protection enacted before March 2012 (WEM – "with existing measures"). In addition to the main WEM scenario, two sensitivity scenarios (WEM Sens 1 and WEM Sens 2) are computed based on alternative assumptions of world economic and fossil fuel price developments. The methodological approach to modelling energy scenarios takes a top-down macroeconomic perspective based on the dynamic econometric Input-Output model DEIO in order to generate national economic and energy data, i.e., GDP and the final energy demand of households and industries. The top-down economic model is interlinked with bottom-up models that derive sectoral energy demands and supply scenarios as well as energy efficiency data for energy-relevant capital stocks from a micro-data perspective. Both results – an annual average GDP growth of 1.5 percent with an average annual growth in energy demand of 0.8 percent (WEM), or a much lower average annual GDP growth of 0.8 percent with an average growth in energy demand of 0.6 percent (WEM Sens 2) – produce a final energy demand of close to 1,100 PJ in 2020 (as stipulated by the Austrian Energy Strategy). The WEM scenario thus attests to a higher energy efficiency which is the result of higher international energy prices. By contrast, the high-growth scenario (WEM Sens 1) with an average annual GDP growth of 2.5 percent and an average annual rise in energy demand of 1.5 percent overshoots the 1,100 PJ target in 2020 by about 100 PJ which grows further to 1,429 PJ in 2030. Thus higher growth would require additional intervention in terms of enacting further climate and energy policy measures to keep final energy demand strictly below 1,100 PJ by 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer & Mark Sommer, 2013. "Energy Scenarios 2030. Model Projections of Energy Demand as a Basis to Quantify Austria's Greenhouse Gas Emissions," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46702, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:46702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/46702
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meyer, I. & Wessely, S., 2009. "Fuel efficiency of the Austrian passenger vehicle fleet--Analysis of trends in the technological profile and related impacts on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3779-3789, October.
    2. A. Greening, Lorna & Greene, David L. & Difiglio, Carmen, 2000. "Energy efficiency and consumption -- the rebound effect -- a survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6-7), pages 389-401, June.
    3. Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer, 2011. "Energy Scenarios 2030. A Basis for the Projection of Austrian Greenhouse Gas Emissions," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41909.
    4. Andreas Breitenfellner & Jesús Crespo Cuaresma & Catherine Keppel, 2009. "Determinants of Crude Oil Prices: Supply, Demand, Cartel or Speculation?," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 4, pages 111-136.
    5. Kurt Kratena & Michael Wüger, 2012. "Technological Change and Energy Demand in Europe," WIFO Working Papers 427, WIFO.
    6. Claudia Kettner & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Angela Köppl & Stefan Schleicher & Sabine-Christina Koller & Armin Leopold & Kathrin Reinsberger & Karl W. Steininger & Hans Schnitzer & Andreas Karner & R, 2010. "Nationaler Aktionsplan 2010 für erneuerbare Energien für Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 40224.
    7. Jeroen Bergh, 2011. "Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(1), pages 43-58, January.
    8. Claudia Kemfert, 2013. "Goldgräberstimmung: Erdgas zu niedrigen Preisen bald auch in Deutschland?: Kommentar," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(3), pages 28-28.
    9. Sorrell, Steve & Dimitropoulos, John & Sommerville, Matt, 2009. "Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1356-1371, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wifo, 2014. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 6/2014," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(6), June.
    2. Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer & Mark Sommer, 2013. "Long-term Climate Mitigation and Energy Use in Austria – The WAM+ Scenario," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46981.
    3. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Angela Köppl, 2015. "Assessing Energy Scenarios for Austria with the ISED-AT Framework," WIFO Working Papers 496, WIFO.
    4. Kurt Kratena & Mark Sommer & Ursula Eysin & Karl Rose, 2014. "Energieszenarien 2050. Herausforderungen an die österreichische Energiewirtschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47185, April.
    5. Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer & Mark Sommer, 2014. "Alternative Szenarien zur Entwicklung des Energieverbrauchs in Österreich. Der Einfluss der CO2- und Energiepreise bis 2030," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(6), pages 427-441, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer & Mark Sommer, 2014. "Alternative Szenarien zur Entwicklung des Energieverbrauchs in Österreich. Der Einfluss der CO2- und Energiepreise bis 2030," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(6), pages 427-441, June.
    2. Wifo, 2014. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 6/2014," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(6), June.
    3. Karen Turner, 2013. ""Rebound" Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    4. Lemoine, Derek, 2020. "General equilibrium rebound from energy efficiency innovation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Martín Bordon Lesme & Jaume Freire-González & Emilio Padilla Rosa, 2020. "The Direct Rebound Effect of Electricity Energy Services in Spanish Households: Evidence from Error Correction Model and System GMM estimates," Working Papers wpdea2002, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    6. Sondes Kahouli & Xavier Pautrel, 2020. "Residential and Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvement: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis of the Rebound Effect," Working Papers 2020.28, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    7. Stela Rubínová, 2011. "Reakce poptávky domácností po energii na zvyšování energetické účinnosti: teorie a její důsledky pro konstrukci empiricky ověřitelných modelů [Reaction of Household Energy Demand to Improvements in," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(3), pages 359-378.
    8. Thomas, Brinda A. & Azevedo, Inês L., 2013. "Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 199-210.
    9. Anna Alberini, Will Gans, and Charles Towe, 2016. "Free Riding, Upsizing, and Energy Efficiency Incentives in Maryland Homes," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    10. Bruns, Stephan B. & Moneta, Alessio & Stern, David I., 2021. "Estimating the economy-wide rebound effect using empirically identified structural vector autoregressions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Vélez-Henao, Johan-Andrés & García-Mazo, Claudia-Maria & Freire-González, Jaume & Vivanco, David Font, 2020. "Environmental rebound effect of energy efficiency improvements in Colombian households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Guzzo, D. & Walrave, B. & Videira, N. & Oliveira, I.C. & Pigosso, D.C.A., 2024. "Towards a systemic view on rebound effects: Modelling the feedback loops of rebound mechanisms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Broberg, Thomas & Berg, Charlotte & Samakovlis, Eva, 2015. "The economy-wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries–A general equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-37.
    14. Nathan W. Chan & Kenneth Gillingham, 2015. "The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 133-159.
    15. Santarius, Tilman & Soland, Martin, 2018. "How Technological Efficiency Improvements Change Consumer Preferences: Towards a Psychological Theory of Rebound Effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 414-424.
    16. Adha, Rishan & Hong, Cheng-Yih & Firmansyah, M. & Paranata, Ade, 2021. "Rebound effect with energy efficiency determinants: a two-stage analysis of residential electricity consumption in Indonesia," MPRA Paper 110444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Schleich, Joachim & Mills, Bradford & Dütschke, Elisabeth, 2014. "A brighter future? Quantifying the rebound effect in energy efficient lighting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 35-42.
    18. Kahouli, Sondes & Pautrel, Xavier, 2020. "Residential and Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvement: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis of the Rebound Effect," FEP: Future Energy Program 308024, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FEP: Future Energy Program.
    19. Li, Ke & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "Heterogeneity in rebound effects: Estimated results and impact of China’s fossil-fuel subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 148-160.
    20. Johan‐Andrés Vélez‐Henao & Claudia‐María García‐Mazo, 2022. "Environmental rebound effect of wind and solar technologies in the Colombian household sector," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1784-1795, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:46702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.