IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/342601.html

Assessing and optimizing the relationship between nutritional quality and environmental impacts of household food consumption: Evidence from the longitudinal data in urban China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shaoting
  • Li, Qiang
  • Chen, Xuan
  • Ren, Yanjun
  • Glauben, Thomas

Abstract

Food consumption is a critical nexus that links human health with environmental sustainability. However, existing research rarely considers the relationship between nutritional upgrading of dietary shifts and their environmental impacts simultaneously, especially in urban areas with significant income disparities. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the relationships between the two in the context of income stratification and promote sustainable transformation of the food system through dietary adjustments. This study constructs an assessment indicator to quantify the relationship between nutritional quality and environmental burdens, including greenhouse gas emissions, freshwater use and land use. Then, we try to optimize current food consumption patterns to achieve a sustainable healthy diet. Our findings reveal that urban households' food consumption deviates significantly from the recommended intake, with low‐income households displaying the poorest nutritional quality. The transition of dietary patterns significantly increases environmental burdens, with high‐income households contributing the largest environmental footprints. As for the nexus between the two, the synergy relationship is achieved in high‐income households, whereas middle‐income households gain nutritional benefits at the expense of environmental health. Adopting optimized diets with less red meat can help urban households improve nutritional quality but lead to greater environmental unsustainability and economic unaffordability, especially for low‐income households. We argue that there is no single optimal dietary pattern that is universally applicable to all households or residents. The finding highlights the need to focus on vulnerable socioeconomic groups, especially low‐income households, when shifting dietary patterns to reconcile nutrition, environment, cost and culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shaoting & Li, Qiang & Chen, Xuan & Ren, Yanjun & Glauben, Thomas, 2026. "Assessing and optimizing the relationship between nutritional quality and environmental impacts of household food consumption: Evidence from the longitudinal data in urban China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 106(2), pages 1094-1104.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:342601
    DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.70239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342601/1/Li_2026_household_food_consumption.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jsfa.70239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreyeva, T. & Long, M.W. & Brownell, K.D., 2010. "The impact of food prices on consumption: A systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(2), pages 216-222.
    2. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    3. Marco Springmann & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Sherman Robinson & Keith Wiebe & H. Charles J. Godfray & Mike Rayner & Peter Scarborough, 2017. "Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 69-74, January.
    4. Henrik Saxe & Thomas Larsen & Lisbeth Mogensen, 2013. "The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 249-262, January.
    5. Marco Springmann & Michael Clark & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Keith Wiebe & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Luis Lassaletta & Wim Vries & Sonja J. Vermeulen & Mario Herrero & Kimberly M. Carlson & Malin Jonell & , 2018. "Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7728), pages 519-525, October.
    6. Pan He & Giovanni Baiocchi & Klaus Hubacek & Kuishuang Feng & Yang Yu, 2018. "The environmental impacts of rapidly changing diets and their nutritional quality in China," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(3), pages 122-127, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Jan Philipp Dietrich & Eleonora Martinelli & Antonia Stenstad & Prajal Pradhan & Sabine Gabrysch & Abhijeet Mishra & Isabelle Weindl & Chantal Le Mouël & Susanne Rolinski & La, 2020. "The ongoing nutrition transition thwarts long-term targets for food security, public health and environmental protection," Post-Print hal-03030437, HAL.
    2. Anne Saint-Eve & Françoise Irlinger & Caroline Pénicaud & Isabelle Souchon & Stephan Marette, 2021. "Consumer preferences for new fermented food products that mix animal and plant protein sources [Les préférences des consommateurs pour de nouveaux produits alimentaires fermentés qui mélangent des sources de protéines animales et végétales]," Post-Print hal-03908155, HAL.
    3. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Birgit Kopainsky & Anita Frehner & Adrian Müller, 2020. "Sustainable and healthy diets: Synergies and trade‐offs in Switzerland," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 908-927, November.
    5. Paul Fesenfeld, Lukas & Maier, Maiken & Brazzola, Nicoletta & Stolz, Niklas & Sun, Yixian & Kachi, Aya, 2023. "How information, social norms, and experience with novel meat substitutes can create positive political feedback and demand-side policy change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Elke Stehfest & Willem-Jan Zeist & Hugo Valin & Petr Havlik & Alexander Popp & Page Kyle & Andrzej Tabeau & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Tomoko Hasegawa & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Katherine Calvin & Jonathan C, 2019. "Key determinants of global land-use projections," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Agyapong, Nana Ama & Annan, Reginald A. & Apprey, Charles & Aryeetey, Richmond, 2022. "A review of Ghana’s food system and its implications on sustainability and the development of national food-based dietary guidelines," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(02).
    8. Marco Springmann & Rita Dingenen & Toon Vandyck & Catharina Latka & Peter Witzke & Adrian Leip, 2023. "The global and regional air quality impacts of dietary change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Shuai Qin & Hong Chen & Haokun Wang, 2021. "Spatial–Temporal Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Rural Residents’ Food Consumption Carbon Emissions in China—Based on an ESDA-GWR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Cai, Hongyi & Biesbroek, Sander & Chang, Zhiyao & Wen, Xin & Fan, Shenggen & Veer, Pieter van 't & Talsma, Elise F., 2024. "How do regional and demographic differences in diets affect the health and environmental impact in China?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Wu, L. & Harris, P. & Misselbrook, T.H. & Lee, M.R.F., 2022. "Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Bonnet, Céline & Coinon, Marine, 2024. "Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Nela Mrchkovska & Nives Dolšak & Aseem Prakash, 2024. "Morality meets menu: investigating the impact of moral appeals on vegetarianism through a conjoint survey experiment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Ricci, Mattia & Dominguez, Ignacio Perez & Van Houtven, Stijn & Hristov, Jordan & Vandyck, Toon, 2026. "Pricing GHG emissions in agriculture: Accounting for trade and fairness for effective climate policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Yu, Wusheng & Clora, Francesco & Costa, Louis & Baudry, Gino, 2021. "Dietary Transitions As Climate Mitigation Measures in Europe: Implications of Supply-Side Responses and Trade Policy Regimes," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315912, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Louis-Georges Soler & Alban Thomas, 2020. "Is there a win–win scenario with increased beef quality and reduced consumption?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(1), pages 91-116.
    17. Zong, Jian & Zhu, Maoran & Xie, Wei, 2024. "Dietary shift brings non-ignorable cross-border health and environment change," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344345, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    18. Rhys Manners & Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Ana M. Tarquis, 2020. "Transitioning European Protein-Rich Food Consumption and Production towards More Sustainable Patterns—Strategies and Policy Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Rehkamp, Sarah & Canning, Patrick, 2016. "The Effects of American Diets on Food System Energy Use," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235896, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Zhaoxin Liu & Erik Ansink, 2024. "Price elasticities of meat, fish and plant-based meat substitutes: evidence from store-level Dutch supermarket scanner data," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-046/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:342601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.