IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/337408.html

Land tenure, autonomy and crop choice: Institutional drivers of agricultural diversification in Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Bilal, Muhammad
  • Umirbekov, Pishenbay
  • Djanibekov, Nodir
  • Tadjiev, Abdusame
  • Mirkasimov, Bakhrom

Abstract

CONTEXT: Crop diversification can improve income stability, reduce environmental risks, and make farming more resilient. Uzbekistan is one such country, where agriculture is shifting from a state-controlled cotton and wheat system towards a more market-oriented approach. This study explores how crop diversification is linked to institutional factors, such as farmers' sense of land security and their ability to make independent decisions. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to understand how the variety of crops grown by farmers is related to their perceptions of land tenure security and decision-making autonomy. It also considers how training, information sources, and farm characteristics are associated with diversification outcomes. METHODS: Using survey data from 450 farms in the Samarkand province collected in 2022, the study measures crop diversification with Simpson's Diversity Index and groups farms into low, medium, and high diversification levels. A heteroscedastic ordered probit model is applied to examine how institutional, geographic, and socio-economic factors are associated with these outcomes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Farmers who feel confident about keeping their land and who report greater freedom in deciding what to grow are more likely to have diversified crop portfolios. Attending more training programs and using land as an incentive for farm workers are also positively linked to diversification. In contrast, relying on media for agronomic information and having formal agricultural education focused on traditional crops are associated with lower diversification. Larger farms tend to avoid monoculture but are not necessarily more likely to achieve high diversification. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that improving land tenure security, expanding farmer autonomy, increasing access to diverse training, and providing better-targeted farming advice can help support the shift towards more diverse and sustainable farming. This has important implications not only for Uzbekistan, but also for other countries undergoing agricultural reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilal, Muhammad & Umirbekov, Pishenbay & Djanibekov, Nodir & Tadjiev, Abdusame & Mirkasimov, Bakhrom, 2026. "Land tenure, autonomy and crop choice: Institutional drivers of agricultural diversification in Uzbekistan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 233, pages 1-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:337408
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/337408/1/Bilal_2026_Land_tenure.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "Untangling the nexus between marketization, crop diversity, farmers' wealth and nutrition: The case of Uzbekistan," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1489-1506, March.
    2. Iroda Rustamova & Abdulla Primov & Aziz Karimov & Botir Khaitov & Akmal Karimov, 2023. "Crop Diversification in the Aral Sea Region: Long-Term Situation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    3. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2008. "Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments," Working Papers 08-26, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    4. Chen, Kevin Z. & Ali, Murad & Veeman, Michele M. & Unterschultz, James R. & Le, Theresa, 2002. "Relative Importance Rankings For Pork Attributes By Asian-Origin Consumers In California: Applying An Ordered Probit Model To A Choice-Based Sample," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(01), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Akhmadiyeva, Zarema & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2021. "How does practice matches land laws in Central Asia?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 109.
    6. Giuseppe Maggio & Nicholas J. Sitko, 2021. "Diversification is in the Detail: Accounting for Crop System Heterogeneity to Inform Diversification Policies in Malawi and Zambia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 264-288, February.
    7. Nozilakhon Mukhamedova & Richard Pomfret, 2019. "Why Does Sharecropping Survive? Agrarian Institutions and Contract Choice in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 61(4), pages 576-597, December.
    8. Tadjiev, Abdusame & Djanibekov, Nodir & Soviadan, Mawussi Kossivi & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2025. "Participation in Informal Cooperation in Water Management and Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Empirical Evidence From Uzbekistan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 69(4), pages 820-835.
    9. Petrick, Martin & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2016. "Obstacles to crop diversification and cotton harvest mechanisation: Farm survey evidence from two contrasting districts in Uzbekistan," IAMO Discussion Papers 234226, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Kurbanov, Zafar & Djanibekov, Nodir & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2025. "Land property rights and investment incentives in movable farm assets: Evidence from post-Soviet Central Asia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 67(2), pages 396-425.
    11. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Giorgia Rivieccio & Salvatore Di Falco & Giovanni De Luca & Fabian Capitanio, 2022. "Agricultural diversification, productivity, and food security across time and space," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(S1), pages 41-58, November.
    12. Loan Vu & Anu Rammohan, 2022. "Agricultural Production Diversity and Child Nutritional Outcomes in Rural Myanmar," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 503-523, March.
    13. Nodir Djanibekov & Kristof van Assche & Ihtiyor Bobojonov & John Lamers, 2012. "Farm Restructuring and Land Consolidation in Uzbekistan: New Farms with Old Barriers," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(6), pages 1101-1126.
    14. Hayatullah Ahmadzai & Oliver Morrissey, 2025. "Crop Diversification, Household Welfare and Conflict: Afghanistan 2011–2017," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 381-399, March.
    15. Gerald Shively & Celeste Sununtnasuk, 2015. "Agricultural Diversity and Child Stunting in Nepal," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 1078-1096, August.
    16. Marios Zachariou & Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack, 2025. "Education and Farmers’ Environmental Performance: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Litchfield, Julie & Reilly, Barry & Veneziani, Mario, 2012. "An analysis of life satisfaction in Albania: An heteroscedastic ordered probit model approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 731-741.
    18. repec:iwt:jounls:h048980 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Ciaian, Pavel & Guri, Fatmir & Rajcaniova, Miroslava & Drabik, Dusan & Paloma, Sergio Gomez y, 2018. "Land fragmentation and production diversification: A case study from rural Albania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 589-599.
    20. Sabine Liebenehm & Huong Jaretzky & Hermann Waibel, 2023. "Extreme weather and agricultural management decisions among smallholder farmers in rural Thailand and Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(5), pages 593-622, September.
    21. Makate, Clifton & Angelsen, Arild & Holden, Stein Terje & Westengen, Ola Tveitereid, 2023. "Evolution of farm-level crop diversification and response to rainfall shocks in smallholder farming: Evidence from Malawi and Tanzania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    22. Jonas Schmitt & Frank Offermann & Andreia F. S. Ribeiro & Robert Finger, 2024. "Drought risk management in agriculture: A copula perspective on crop diversification," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(5), pages 823-847, September.
    23. World Bank, 2024. "Uzbekistan Climate Adaptation and Resilience Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 41994, The World Bank Group.
    24. Buisson, Marie-Charlotte & Balasubramanya, Soumya, 2019. "The effect of irrigation service delivery and training in agronomy on crop choice in Tajikistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 175-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zafar Kurbanov & Nodir Djanibekov & Thomas Herzfeld, 2025. "Land Property Rights and Investment Incentives in Movable Farm Assets: Evidence from Post-Soviet Central Asia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 67(2), pages 396-425, June.
    2. Petrick, Martin (Петрик, Мартин), 2022. "Post-Soviet transformation of agriculture: A success after all? [Постсоветская Трансформация Сельского Хозяйства: И Все-Таки Успех?]," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 7, pages 103-130.
    3. Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "Untangling the nexus between marketization, crop diversity, farmers' wealth and nutrition: The case of Uzbekistan," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1489-1506, March.
    4. Nguyen, Kim Lan, 2025. "Can land fragmentation mitigate the impact of weather shocks? Evidence from rural Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Post-Soviet agricultural restructuring: A success story after all?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 623-647.
    6. Akhmadiyeva, Zarema & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2021. "How does practice matches land laws in Central Asia?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Schmitt, Jonas & Offermann, Frank & Finger, Robert, 2025. "The use of crop diversification in agricultural yield insurance products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Munnangi, Aswani Kumar & Lohani, Bharat & Misra, Subhas Chandra, 2020. "A review of land consolidation in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India: Qualitative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Fujimoto, Takefumi & Suzuki, Aya, 2025. "Different strategies of crop diversification between poor and non-poor farmers: Concepts and evidence from Tanzania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Do, Manh Hung & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2023. "Land consolidation, rice production, and agricultural transformation: Evidence from household panel data for Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 157-173.
    11. Karl Ove Aarbu, 2010. "Demand Patterns for Treatment Insurance in Norway," CESifo Working Paper Series 3021, CESifo.
    12. Abdusame Tadjiev & Nodir Djanibekov & Mawussi Kossivi Soviadan & Thomas Herzfeld, 2025. "Participation in Informal Cooperation in Water Management and Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Empirical Evidence From Uzbekistan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(4), pages 820-835, October.
    13. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: evidence from a consumer survey," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1300, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales.
    14. Charlotte Fabri & Sam Vermeulen & Steven Van Passel & Sergei Schaub, 2024. "Crop diversification and the effect of weather shocks on Italian farmers' income and income risk," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 955-980, September.
    15. Lipy Adhikari & Sabarnee Tuladhar & Abid Hussain & Kamal Aryal, 2019. "Are Traditional Food Crops Really ‘Future Smart Foods?’ A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Yoji Kunimitsu, 2015. "Regional Factors Affecting the Satisfaction of Residents: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model in Japan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 483-497, January.
    17. Yen H. T. Nguyen & Tuyen Q. Tran & Dung T. Hoang & Thu M. T. Tran & Trung T. Nguyen, 2023. "Land quality, income, and poverty among rural households in the North Central Region, Vietnam," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 150-172, June.
    18. Tsegay Gebrekidan Tekleselassie, 2017. "Subjective Wellbeing and Institutions: The Case of Rural Ethiopia," Working Papers 016, Policy Studies Institute.
    19. Otterbach, Steffen & Rogan, Michael, 2017. "Spatial differences in stunting and household agricultural production in South African: (re-)examining the links using national panel survey data," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 13-2017, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    20. Kekezi, Orsa & Mellander, Charlotta, 2017. "Geography and Media – Does a Local Editorial Office Increase the Consumption of Local News?," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 447, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:337408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.