IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/336453.html

Stakeholder theory: A radical institutionalist view

Author

Listed:
  • Valentinov, Vladislav

Abstract

Stakeholder theory is sometimes criticized by radical scholars for being pro-business and pro-capitalistic. However, stakeholder theorists recognize their disagreements with neoclassical economics and reject the notion of shareholder primacy. I argue that the rejection of shareholder primacy introduces a radical dimension to stakeholder theory, which can be further developed by drawing on the radical institutionalist literature. This literature acknowledges that private ownership can impede the social provisioning process by acting as a ceremonial drag. By adopting a radical institutionalist view of stakeholder theory, I suggest that rejecting shareholder primacy implies eliminating ceremonial elements that hinder the social provisioning process. Consequently, I see stakeholder management as a possible means of replacing these elements with discretionary community control that promotes inclusion, empowerment, and engagement of diverse stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentinov, Vladislav, 2025. "Stakeholder theory: A radical institutionalist view," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1001-1015.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:336453
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2025.2575145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/336453/1/Valentinov_2025_Stakeholder_theory.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2025.2575145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul D. Bush, 1987. "The Theory of Institutional Change," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 1075-1116, September.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    3. Anant K. Sundaram & Andrew C. Inkpen, 2004. "The Corporate Objective Revisited," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 350-363, June.
    4. William M. Dugger & Howard J. Sherman, 1997. "Institutionalist and Marxist Theories of Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 991-1010, December.
    5. Veblen, Thorstein, 1921. "The Engineers and the Price System," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1921.
    6. Glen Atkinson & Eric R. Hake & Stephen P. Paschall, 2019. "Evolution of the Corporation in the United States: Stabilized Scarcity and Vested Interests," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Jay B. Barney, 2018. "Why resource‐based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(13), pages 3305-3325, December.
    8. Ronald K. Mitchell & Harry J. Van Buren III & Michelle Greenwood & R. Edward Freeman, 2015. "Stakeholder Inclusion and Accounting for Stakeholders," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(7), pages 851-877, November.
    9. William M. Dugger, 2006. "Veblen’s Radical Theory of Social Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 651-672, September.
    10. Vladislav Valentinov, 2022. "Stakeholder theory and the knowledge problem: A Hayekian perspective," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 536-545, April.
    11. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    12. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2022. "Stakeholder theory and the knowledge problem: A Hayekian perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 536-545.
    13. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Post-Print hal-03466563, HAL.
    14. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K. Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 1-28, January.
    15. Vladislav Valentinov, 2023. "Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Classical Institutional Economics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88, November.
    16. Valentinov, Vladislav & Roth, Steffen, 2022. "Chester Barnard’s theory of the firm: An institutionalist view," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 707-720.
    17. Mahoney, Joseph T. & Godfrey, Paul, 2014. "'The Functions of the Executive' at 75: An Invitation to Reconsider a Timeless Classic," Working Papers 14-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    18. Lenore Palladino, 2022. "Economic Policies for Innovative Enterprises: Implementing Multi-Stakeholder Corporate Governance," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 5-25, March.
    19. Vladislav Valentinov & Steffen Roth, 2022. "Chester Barnard’s Theory of the Firm: An Institutionalist View," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 707-720, July.
    20. Anant K. Sundaram & Andrew C. Inkpen, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”: A Reply," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 370-371, June.
    21. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    22. Veblen, Thorstein, 1919. "The Vested Interests and the Common Man," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1919.
    23. John R. Munkirs, 1988. "The Dichotomy: Views of a Fifth Generation Institutionalist," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 1035-1044, December.
    24. David Ciepley, 2019. "Can Corporations Be Held to the Public Interest, or Even to the Law?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1003-1018, February.
    25. Paddy Ireland, 2010. "Limited liability, shareholder rights and the problem of corporate irresponsibility," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(5), pages 837-856.
    26. James Ronald Stanfield & Michael C. Carroll, 2004. "Governance and the legitimacy of Corporate Power: A Path for Convergence of Heterodox Economics?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 363-370, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2026. "Digital twin fosters social entrepreneurship for smart sustainable infrastructure: mediating role of environmental management accounting practices," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    2. Vladislav Valentinov, 2025. "Three Problems of Business Addressed by Stakeholder Theory: Insights from the Institutional Economics of John R. Commons," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(3), pages 717-733, October.
    3. Vladislav Valentinov, 2023. "Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Classical Institutional Economics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88, November.
    4. Roth, Steffen & Sales, Augusto & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2025. "Value plurality and multifunctional commensuration in organisation: A systems‐theoretical approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 553-562.
    5. Vladislav Valentinov & Ronaldo de Oliveira Santos Jhunior & Helna Almeida de Araujo Góes, 2026. "Corporate Environmental Sustainability Via Stakeholder Collaboration: Insights from Classical Institutional Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(2), pages 279-296, January.
    6. Valentinov, Vladislav & de Oliveira Santos Jhunior, Ronaldo & de Araujo Góes, Helna Almeida, 2025. "Corporate Environmental Sustainability Via Stakeholder Collaboration: Insights from Classical Institutional Economics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 203(2), pages 279-296.
    7. Daniel G. Arce, 2007. "Is Agency Theory Self‐Activating?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(4), pages 708-720, October.
    8. Zdravka Todorova, 2013. "Connecting social provisioning and functional finance in a post-Keynesian–Institutional analysis of the public sector," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 61-75.
    9. Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu & Lite J. Nartey, 2014. "Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1727-1748, December.
    10. Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander, 2011. "Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 421-438, September.
    11. Donal Crilly, 2013. "Recasting Enterprise Strategy: Towards Stakeholder Research That Matters to General Managers," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1427-1447, December.
    12. David Rönnegard & N. Craig Smith, 2024. "A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 295-308, March.
    13. Jo, Tae-Hee, 2013. "Uncertainty, Instability, and the Control of Markets," MPRA Paper 47936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ryan Krause & Michael C. Withers, 2022. "Propulsions Toward What Capes? Testing Normative Theory Through a Panorama of Consequences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 317-333, November.
    15. John Buchanan & Dominic H. Chai & Simon Deakin, 2018. "Unexpected Corporate Outcomes from Hedge Find Activism in Japan," Working Papers wp494, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Christopher, Joe, 2010. "Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 683-695.
    17. Taekjin Shin & Jihae You, 2017. "Pay for Talk: How the Use of Shareholder-Value Language Affects CEO Compensation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 88-117, January.
    18. Vladislav Valentinov & Steffen Roth, 2024. "Stakeholder theory: Exploring systems‐theoretic and process‐philosophic connections," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 301-315, March.
    19. R. Edward Freeman & Andrew C. Wicks & Bidhan Parmar, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 364-369, June.
    20. Cordeiro, Cheryl Marie & Adomaitis, Laurynas & Huang, Lei, 2026. "The AI-policy-governance nexus: How regulation and AI shift corporate governance toward stakeholders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:336453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.