IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wyz/journl/id786.html

Modeling the Probability of Consumer Boycott Participation Among Europeans Using Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Słowiński
  • Tomasz Szopiński
  • Michał Wilczewski

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Słowiński & Tomasz Szopiński & Michał Wilczewski, 2025. "Modeling the Probability of Consumer Boycott Participation Among Europeans Using Artificial Intelligence," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 19(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wyz:journl:id:786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ce.vizja.pl/en/download-pdf/id/786
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krist Swimberghe & Laura Flurry & Janna Parker, 2011. "Consumer Religiosity: Consequences for Consumer Activism in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 453-467, October.
    2. Dhavan V. Shah & Douglas M. McLeod & Eunkyung Kim & Sun Young Lee & Melissa R. Gotlieb & Shirley S. Ho & Hilde Breivik, 2007. "Political Consumerism: How Communication and Consumption Orientations Drive “Lifestyle Politicsâ€," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 217-235, May.
    3. Sen, Sankar & Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep & Morwitz, Vicki, 2001. "Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 399-417, December.
    4. H. Holly Wang & Na Hao & Xinxin Wang & Dongwhoi Moon, 2025. "A three‐country study on consumer responses to political conflicts: Boycott, buycott, or standby," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(4), pages 1433-1468, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Hydock & Neeru Paharia & T. J. Weber, 2019. "The Consumer Response to Corporate Political Advocacy: a Review and Future Directions," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(3), pages 76-83, December.
    2. Francisco-José Cossío-Silva & María-Ángeles Revilla-Camacho & Beatriz Palacios-Florencio & Dolores Garzón Benítez, 2019. "How to face a political boycott: the relevance of entrepreneurs’ awareness," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 321-339, June.
    3. Thanh Hoai Nguyen & Hai Quynh Ngo & Pham Ngoc Nha Ngo & Gi-Du Kang, 2018. "Understanding the Motivations Influencing Ecological Boycott Participation: An Exploratory Study in Viet Nam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Colin B. Gabler & Meike Eilert, 2024. "Social institutions as enablers and inhibitors of environmental activism: A cross‐cultural perspective," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 663-691, June.
    5. Sonia Capelli & Legrand Pascal & William Sabadie, 2011. "Communication de crise : Le cas d'un appel au boycott," Post-Print halshs-00620097, HAL.
    6. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    7. Kim, Sumin & He, Hongwei, 2025. "The impact of brand activism on consumer behaviors: Examining the contrasting roles of admiration and anger," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Charis X. Li & Xiao-xiao Liu & Jun Ye & Siyu Zheng & Songyin Cai, 2024. "Ethical Pursuit or Personal Nirvana? Unpacking the Practice of Danshari in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 675-695, May.
    9. Hsing‐Hua Stella Chang & Cher‐Min Fong & Ku‐Yuan Wang, 2025. "Social Dilemmas in Small Enterprises' Intention to Switch to Green Supply With a Premium Price," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5054-5068, July.
    10. Scheidler, Sabrina & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Partners in crime? The impact of consumers' culpability for corporate social irresponsibility on their boycott attitude," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 607-620.
    11. Hartl, Barbara & Hofmann, Eva & Kirchler, Erich, 2016. "Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2756-2763.
    12. Zyglidopoulos, Stelios C. & Georgiadis, Andreas P. & Carroll, Craig E. & Siegel, Donald S., 2012. "Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1622-1627.
    13. Qi Sun & Fang Wu & Shanjun Li & Rajdeep Grewal, 2021. "Consumer Boycotts, Country of Origin, and Product Competition: Evidence from China’s Automobile Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5857-5877, September.
    14. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Martijn G. de Jong & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2009. "A Model for the Construction of Country-Specific Yet Internationally Comparable Short-Form Marketing Scales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 674-689, 07-08.
    16. Nieves García-de-Frutos & José Manuel Ortega-Egea & Javier Martínez-del-Río, 2018. "Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 411-435, March.
    17. Daglish, Toby, 2015. "Consumer Governance in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 4183, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    18. Chen, Kee-Kuo & Ho, Hui-Ping & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2015. "Estimating attributes importance for container shipping industry by closing the listening gap with maximum convergent validity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 145-163.
    19. SandIkcI, Özlem & Ekici, Ahmet, 2009. "Politically motivated brand rejection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 208-217, February.
    20. Iyer, Rajesh & Muncy, James A., 2009. "Purpose and object of anti-consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 160-168, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wyz:journl:id:786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin W. Staniewski, Ph.D. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vizjapl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.