IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v64y2025i1ne12039.html

Exploring Perceived Usefulness of Using Autonomous Trucks in Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Zhang
  • A. Haddud

Abstract

Historically, the U.S. Gulf Coast region carries more burdens than other communities, including generated air pollution, delays and crashes, and frequent floods. Thus, there is a strong need to improve the efficiency of freight transportation and reduce environmental impacts by using emerging technologies. This study aims to explore the perceived usefulness of using Autonomous Trucks in logistics in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in the U.S. Gulf Coast region. Data were collected using an online survey from 72 members of the Trucking Associations in the U.S. states of Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. The participants' perceptions were captured using 14 pre‐determined perceived usefulness on a five‐point level of agreement. A Likert scale was developed based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics Software—Version 29. The results showed mixed perceived usefulness. Items related to efficiency were mostly supported, and items related to effectiveness were mostly neutral. Items related to overall satisfaction were mostly not supported. In addition, some participant groups reported higher levels of agreement with the examined items than others. For example, those who worked in a business with 500 employees or more, had much knowledge of autonomous trucks, worked in sales, had two or fewer years of work experience, and worked in a business with international market coverage. In addition, participants who worked in businesses transporting agriculture, food, and livestock cargo reported higher levels of agreement with the examined perceived usefulness than those who worked in companies transporting construction, fuel, machinery, waste, and mixed freight. This study contributes to the academic literature by adding more insights about the perceived usefulness of autonomous trucks in logistics. The results would benefit academics, researchers, logisticians, supply chain managers, autonomous truck manufacturers, policymakers, and other interested stakeholders. They can also help develop future research projects in a similar domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Zhang & A. Haddud, 2025. "Exploring Perceived Usefulness of Using Autonomous Trucks in Logistics," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:64:y:2025:i:1:n:e12039
    DOI: 10.1002/tjo3.12039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/tjo3.12039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/tjo3.12039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rico Merkert & Kai Hoberg & Kumaraguru Mahadevan, 2023. "Logistics and Supply Chain Superpowers and Skills for Survival in the “New Normal” Globalized World," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 369-396, September.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. Tao, Xin & Mårtensson, Jonas & Warnquist, Håkan & Pernestål, Anna, 2022. "Short-term maintenance planning of autonomous trucks for minimizing economic risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Tobias Schoenherr, 2016. "Mobile Devices and Applications for Supply Chain Management: Process, Contingency, and Performance Effects," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 333-381, October.
    5. Thomas J. Goldsby & Thu Trang Hoang & Theodore P. Stank & John E. Bell, 2023. "A Modernized Framework for Transportation Decision‐Making in a Hyper‐Integrated Global Supply Chain Environment," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(1), pages 16-42, January.
    6. Abhay K. Grover & Muhammad Hasan Ashraf, 2024. "Autonomous and IoT‐driven intralogistics for Industry 4.0 warehouses: A thematic analysis of the literature," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 42-61, January.
    7. Peng Jing & Gang Xu & Yuexia Chen & Yuji Shi & Fengping Zhan, 2020. "The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Maria Matusiewicz, 2020. "Logistics of the Future—Physical Internet and Its Practicality," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(2), pages 200-214, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    2. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Usunier, Jean-Claude, 1998. "Oral pleasure and expatriate satisfaction: an empirical approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 89-110, February.
    5. Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Md Abul Kalam Azad & Loo-See Beh, 2015. "Determinants of Academics' Job Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Private Universities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo & Charles Mallans Rambo & Charles Misiko Wafula, 2024. "Hedging Derivatives and Performance of Renewable Energy Projects in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(8), pages 619-630, August.
    7. Sharma, Vivek & Bhat, Dada Ab Rouf, 2020. "An empirical study exploring the relationship among human capital innovation, service innovation, competitive advantage and employee productivity in hospitality services," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14..
    8. Deepak, 2016. "Antecedent Value of Professional Commitment and Job Involvement in Determining Job Satisfaction," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(2), pages 154-164, May.
    9. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    10. Marianela Denegri & María Baeza & Natalia Salinas-Oñate & Verónica Peñaloza & Horacio Miranda & Ligia Orellana, 2014. "Materialism in Pedagogy Students in Chile," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 505-521, June.
    11. Terason Sid, 2021. "Predicting Sports Facility Revisit Intentions Based on Experience and Mediating Effects of Perceived Value," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 35-41, September.
    12. Amy Roberts & Gregory S. Ching, 2021. "The Ebb and Flow of Study Abroad: A Comparative Analysis of PRC and International Students in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Tomislav Letnik & Katja Hanžič & Giuseppe Luppino & Matej Mencinger, 2022. "Impact of Logistics Trends on Freight Transport Development in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Julia Eichholz & Thorsten Knauer & Sandra Winkelmann, 2023. "Digital Maturity of Forecasting and its Impact in Times of Crisis," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 443-481, December.
    15. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. William Kelly & Phillips Cutright & David Hittle, 1976. "Comment on charles F. Hohm’s “social security and fertility: An international perspective”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(4), pages 581-586, November.
    17. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    18. repec:bjc:journl:v:8:y:2022:i:12:p:28-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0155225 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Joungmin Kim & Sun Joo Ryu, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainable Design Thinking Education Efficiency: A Comparative Study of Synchronous Online and Offline Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    22. Kumar, Vikas & Kaushik, Arun Kumar & Noravesh, Farima & Sindhwani, Rahul & Mathiyazhagan, K., 2025. "Green drives: Understanding how environmental propensity, range and technological anxiety shape electric vehicle adoption intentions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:64:y:2025:i:1:n:e12039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.