IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v59y2020i4p369-398.html

Optimal Budget Allocation to Improve Critical Infrastructure during Earthquakes

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Edrisi
  • Moein Askari

Abstract

This article studies the integrated role of three infrastructure management agencies with responsibilities that span from pre‐disaster mitigation and preparedness actions to post‐disaster response operations during earthquakes. Each agency's actions are constrained by a given budget that is assigned to that agency by a master decision‐maker (the federal government). This article presents a bi‐level Stackelberg game where the master decision‐maker allocates a total budget between the agencies with the objective of minimizing the earthquake death toll. A meta‐heuristic particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to find the optimal solution of the Stackelberg game. Results show that in lower budgets, it is better to invest in the emergency response agency and the transportation agency. Furthermore, the results indicate that excessive investment in the transportation agency without adequate investment in the emergency response agency is inefficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Edrisi & Moein Askari, 2020. "Optimal Budget Allocation to Improve Critical Infrastructure during Earthquakes," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(4), pages 369-398, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:59:y:2020:i:4:p:369-398
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.59.4.0369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.59.4.0369
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.59.4.0369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clark, Stephen & Watling, David, 2005. "Modelling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 119-140, February.
    2. Marto, Ricardo & Papageorgiou, Chris & Klyuev, Vladimir, 2018. "Building resilience to natural disasters: An application to small developing states," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 574-586.
    3. Du, Zhen-Ping & Nicholson, Alan, 1997. "Degradable transportation systems: Sensitivity and reliability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 225-237, June.
    4. Namkyung Oh & Junghyae Lee, 2017. "Activation and variation of the United Nation’s cluster coordination model: a comparative analysis of the Haiti and Japan disasters," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 41-60, January.
    5. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    6. Hossain Poorzahedy & Sayed Bushehri, 2005. "Network performance improvement under stochastic events with long-term effects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 65-85, January.
    7. de la Torre, Luis E. & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen R., 2012. "Disaster relief routing: Integrating research and practice," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 88-97.
    8. Nicholson, Alan & Du, Zhen-Ping, 1997. "Degradable transportation systems: An integrated equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-223, June.
    9. Koray Özpolat & Dina Ribbink & Douglas N. Hales & Robert J. Windle, 2015. "Food Aid Procurement and Transportation Decision‐making in Governmental Agencies: The United Nations/European Union versus the United States Approach," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 159-185, April.
    10. Hooman Motamed & Bijan Khazai & Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany & Kambod Amini-Hosseini, 2014. "An automated model for optimizing budget allocation in earthquake mitigation scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 51-68, January.
    11. Chakravarty, Amiya K., 2014. "Humanitarian relief chain: Rapid response under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 146-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Edrissi, Ali & Poorzahedy, Hossain & Nassiri, Habibollah & Nourinejad, Mehdi, 2013. "A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 261-275.
    3. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    4. Berdica, Katja, 2002. "An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 117-127, April.
    5. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    6. Ng, ManWo & Waller, S. Travis, 2010. "A computationally efficient methodology to characterize travel time reliability using the fast Fourier transform," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1202-1219, December.
    7. Esposito Amideo, A. & Scaparra, M.P. & Kotiadis, K., 2019. "Optimising shelter location and evacuation routing operations: The critical issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 279-295.
    8. Nihal Berktaş & Bahar Yetiş Kara & Oya Ekin Karaşan, 2016. "Solution methodologies for debris removal in disaster response," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 403-445, September.
    9. TURKEŠ, Renata & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & PALHAZI CUERVO, Daniel, 2020. "Deriving rules of thumb for facility decision making in humanitarian operations," Working Papers 2020002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    10. Biswal, Arun Kumar & Jenamani, Mamata & Kumar, Sri Krishna, 2018. "Warehouse efficiency improvement using RFID in a humanitarian supply chain: Implications for Indian food security system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 205-224.
    11. Nima Haghighi & S. Kiavash Fayyaz & Xiaoyue Cathy Liu & Tony H. Grubesic & Ran Wei, 2018. "A Multi-Scenario Probabilistic Simulation Approach for Critical Transportation Network Risk Assessment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 181-203, March.
    12. Moshref-Javadi, Mohammad & Lee, Seokcheon, 2016. "The Latency Location-Routing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 604-619.
    13. Lydia Novoszel & Tina Wakolbinger, 2022. "Meta-analysis of Supply Chain Disruption Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    15. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Albores, Pavel & Brewster, Christopher, 2018. "Dynamic formulation for humanitarian response operations incorporating multiple organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 83-98.
    16. Lertworawanich, Ponlathep & Dechasakulsom, Montri & Aursudkij, Bhanitiz, 2012. "Highway network restoration after disasters," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207120, Transportation Research Forum.
    17. Tofighi, S. & Torabi, S.A. & Mansouri, S.A., 2016. "Humanitarian logistics network design under mixed uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 239-250.
    18. Gralla, Erica & Goentzel, Jarrod, 2018. "Humanitarian transportation planning: Evaluation of practice-based heuristics and recommendations for improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 436-450.
    19. Muriel-Villegas, Juan E. & Alvarez-Uribe, Karla C. & Patiño-Rodríguez, Carmen E. & Villegas, Juan G., 2016. "Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards – Insights from a Colombian case," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 151-165.
    20. Siu, Barbara W.Y. & Lo, Hong K., 2008. "Doubly uncertain transportation network: Degradable capacity and stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 166-181, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:59:y:2020:i:4:p:369-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.