IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v57y2018i2p163-192.html

An Exploratory Investigation of New Entrant Motor Carriers' Longitudinal Safety Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Miller
  • John P. Saldanha

Abstract

Commercial truck crashes cause thousands of fatalities and serious injuries every year in the United States. One aspect of motor‐carrier safety that has received limited attention, both theoretically and empirically, is the safety of new entrant motor carriers. This limited attention is surprising given regulators perceive new entrants as posing substantial safety concerns. This research seeks to fill this void by drawing on generative mechanisms from old institutional theory and population ecology to theorize that new entrants are likely to follow one of two safety trajectories. This complements prior work that has sought to explain safety differences between new entrants and established carriers. To test our theory, we collect longitudinal safety data from the Compliance, Safety, and Accountability program for a large sample of new entrant carriers and fit a series of mixed‐effects models to estimate new entrants' safety trajectories. Our results provide corroborating evidence for our theorized trajectories and identify how one new entrant characteristic, size, affects these firms' safety trajectories.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Miller & John P. Saldanha, 2018. "An Exploratory Investigation of New Entrant Motor Carriers' Longitudinal Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 163-192, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:57:y:2018:i:2:p:163-192
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Rogosa & John Willett, 1985. "Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 203-228, June.
    2. Tammy L. Madsen & Gordon Walker, 2007. "Incumbent and Entrant Rivalry in a Deregulated Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 667-687, August.
    3. David E. Cantor & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm & Prabhjot Singh, 2016. "Technology, Firm Size, and Safety: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the US Motor‐carrier Industry," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 149-167, April.
    4. Levinthal, D.A. & Fichman, M., 1991. "Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence : A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social Organizational Relationships," GSIA Working Papers 1991-34, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    5. Christopher W. Craighead & David J. Ketchen & Li Cheng, 2016. "“Goldilocks” Theorizing in Supply Chain Research: Balancing Scientific and Practical Utility via Middle‐Range Theory," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 241-257, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Miller, 2020. "Why Are Larger Motor Carriers More Compliant with Safety Regulations?," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 28-72, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Miller, 2017. "Discrete Time Hazard Modeling of Large Motor Carriers' Longitudinal Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 107-139, April.
    2. Laharish Guntuka & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm & David E. Cantor, 2019. "US Motor‐Carrier Exit: Prevalence and Determinants," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 79-100, April.
    3. Simone T. Peinkofer & Matthew A. Schwieterman & Jason W. Miller, 2020. "Last‐Mile Delivery in the Motor‐Carrier Industry: A Panel Data Investigation Using Discrete Time Event History Analysis," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(2), pages 129-164, April.
    4. Marco Grazzi & Chiara Piccardo & Cecilia Vergari, 2022. "Turmoil over the crisis: innovation capabilities and firm exit," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 537-564, August.
    5. Daniel Fackler & Claus Schnabel & Joachim Wagner, 2013. "Establishment exits in Germany: the role of size and age," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 683-700, October.
    6. Gary Kleinman & Dan Palmon, 2000. "A Negotiation-Oriented Model of Auditor-Client Relationships," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 17-45, January.
    7. Isaksson, Olov H.D. & Simeth, Markus & Seifert, Ralf W., 2016. "Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 699-706.
    8. Alex Coad, 2018. "Firm age: a survey," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 13-43, January.
    9. Thomas Ã…stebro, 1998. "Basic Statistics on the Success Rate and Profits for Independent Inventors," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(2), pages 41-48, December.
    10. Acedo, Francisco J. & Coviello, Nicole & Agustí, María, 2021. "Caution ahead! The long-term effects of initial export intensity and geographic dispersion on INV development," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(6).
    11. Grilli, Luca & Piva, Evila & Lamastra, Cristina Rossi, 2010. "Firm dissolution in high-tech sectors: An analysis of closure and M&A," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 14-16, October.
    12. Joshua R. Schumm & Peter M. Ralston & Matthew A. Schwieterman, 2024. "The challenges of supply side obsolescence: Obsolescence procurement's past, present, and future," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 7-23, January.
    13. Tammy L. Madsen & Michael J. Leiblein, 2015. "What Factors Affect the Persistence of an Innovation Advantage?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1097-1127, December.
    14. Monica Garcia-Perez & Christopher Goetz & John Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky, 2013. "Don't Quit Your Day Job: Using Wage and Salary Earnings to Support a New Business," Working Papers 13-45, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    15. Laamanen, Tomi, 2005. "Dependency, resource depth, and supplier performance during industry downturn," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-140, March.
    16. Yadong Luo, 2007. "Private control and collective control in international joint ventures," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 531-566, October.
    17. Romi Kher & Shu Yang & Scott L. Newbert, 2023. "Accelerating emergence: the causal (but contextual) effect of social impact accelerators on nascent for-profit social ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 389-413, June.
    18. Federico Aime & Aaron D. Hill & Jason W. Ridge, 2020. "Looking for respect? How prior TMT social comparisons affect executives' new TMT engagements," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2185-2199, December.
    19. Estrada, Isabel & Faems, Dries & Martin Cruz, Natalia & Perez Santana, Pilar, 2016. "The role of interpartner dissimilarities in Industry-University alliances: Insights from a comparative case study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 2008-2022.
    20. Peng, George Z. & Beamish, Paul W., 2019. "Subnational FDI Legitimacy and Foreign Subsidiary Survival," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:57:y:2018:i:2:p:163-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.