IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v59y2020i2p129-164.html

Last‐Mile Delivery in the Motor‐Carrier Industry: A Panel Data Investigation Using Discrete Time Event History Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Simone T. Peinkofer
  • Matthew A. Schwieterman
  • Jason W. Miller

Abstract

Industry analysts have noted that the rise of e‐commerce has increased the demand for last‐mile delivery services, defined as the last‐mile transportation of large, bulky items (e.g., furniture) that cannot be shipped by parcel carriers to consumers' locations. Although last‐mile delivery has become crucial for retail logistics, no research has examined which carriers are more likely to diversify into last‐mile delivery. As such decisions require large investments, motor carriers have an interest in understanding their peers' behaviors in this domain. Drawing on resource orchestration theory and Penrose's theory of firm growth, we devise middle‐range theory that explains why carriers' provision of less‐than‐truckload (LTL) or expedite services will increase their likelihood of subsequently offering last‐mile delivery services. Our theory further explains why these services will serve as substitutes such that the marginal effect of providing LTL services on subsequently offering last‐mile delivery will be less when a carrier also offers expedite services, and vice versa. To test our theory, we assemble an archival panel dataset from Inbound Logistics, a premier industry publication, that summarizes carriers' various delivery services. Results from discrete time event history models corroborate our theorized predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone T. Peinkofer & Matthew A. Schwieterman & Jason W. Miller, 2020. "Last‐Mile Delivery in the Motor‐Carrier Industry: A Panel Data Investigation Using Discrete Time Event History Analysis," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(2), pages 129-164, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:59:y:2020:i:2:p:129-164
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.59.2.0129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.59.2.0129
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.59.2.0129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David E. Cantor & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm & Prabhjot Singh, 2016. "Technology, Firm Size, and Safety: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the US Motor‐carrier Industry," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 149-167, April.
    2. Feitler, Jane N. & Corsi, Thomas M. & Grimm, Curtis M., 1997. "Measuring firm strategic change in the regulated and deregulated motor carrier industry: An 18 year evaluation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 159-169, September.
    3. Yao “Henry” Jin & David Swanson & Matthew Waller & John Ozment, 2017. "To Survive and Thrive under Hypercompetition: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Strategic Purity on Truckload Motor‐Carrier Financial Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 1-34, January.
    4. John W. Braklow & William W. Graham & Stephen M. Hassler & Ken E. Peck & Warren B. Powell, 1992. "Interactive Optimization Improves Service and Performance for Yellow Freight System," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 147-172, February.
    5. Robert W. Kling, 1988. "Trucking Deregulation: Evolution of a New Power Structure," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 1201-1211, December.
    6. S.A. Lippman & R.P. Rumelt, 1982. "Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 418-438, Autumn.
    7. Fariborz Damanpour, 1996. "Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 693-716, May.
    8. Jason Miller, 2017. "Discrete Time Hazard Modeling of Large Motor Carriers' Longitudinal Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 107-139, April.
    9. Terry L. Esper & Simone T. Peinkofer, 2017. "Consumer‐Based Supply Chain Management Performance Research: A Structured Literature Review," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 395-428, October.
    10. Christopher W. Craighead & David J. Ketchen & Li Cheng, 2016. "“Goldilocks” Theorizing in Supply Chain Research: Balancing Scientific and Practical Utility via Middle‐Range Theory," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 241-257, July.
    11. Mahoney, Joseph T., 1995. "The management of resources and the resource of management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 91-101, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc A. Scott & Christopher A. Boone & Matthew T. Jenkins & Sebastián García‐Dastugue, 2024. "Investigating the effects of customer traits on preference for last‐mile delivery service attributes: When the product introduces a task," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(2), pages 127-151, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laharish Guntuka & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm & David E. Cantor, 2019. "US Motor‐Carrier Exit: Prevalence and Determinants," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 79-100, April.
    2. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    3. Jason Miller, 2017. "Discrete Time Hazard Modeling of Large Motor Carriers' Longitudinal Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 107-139, April.
    4. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Sheen S. Levine & Mark Bernard & Rosemarie Nagel, 2018. "Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behaviour," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 527-527, February.
    6. Danchi Tan & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2007. "The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in U.S. Industries: The Penrose effect," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 259-279, March.
    7. Klaus Uhlenbruck & Klaus E. Meyer & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Organizational Transformation in Transition Economies: Resource‐based and Organizational Learning Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 257-282, March.
    8. Michael S. Garver & Zachary Williams, 2025. "Logistics customer service and customer satisfaction: Importance‐based segments for motor carriers," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), January.
    9. Jason Miller & John P. Saldanha, 2018. "An Exploratory Investigation of New Entrant Motor Carriers' Longitudinal Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 163-192, April.
    10. Nicolai J. Foss, 1997. "Equilibrium vs Evolution in the Resource-Based Perspective The Conflicting Legacies of Demsetz and Penrose," DRUID Working Papers 97-10, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    11. Keld Laursen & Volker Mahnke & Per Vejrup-Hansen, 2005. "Do Differences Make a Difference? The Impact of Human Capital Diversity, Experience and Compensation on Firm Performance in Engineering Consulting," DRUID Working Papers 05-04, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    12. Greenley, Gordon E. & Hooley, Graham J. & Rudd, John M., 2005. "Market orientation in a multiple stakeholder orientation context: implications for marketing capabilities and assets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1483-1494, November.
    13. Miller, Jason W. & Phares, Jonathan & Burks, Stephen V., 2023. "Job Creation and Job Destruction Dynamics in the U.S. Truck Transportation Industry, 1995-2019," IZA Discussion Papers 16184, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Moses Acquaah & Tailan Chi, 2007. "A longitudinal analysis of the impact of firm resources and industry characteristics on firm-specific profitability," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 11(3), pages 179-213, September.
    15. Jongwook Kim & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2002. "Resource-based and property rights perspectives on value creation: the case of oil field unitization," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 225-245.
    16. Nickerson, Jack A. & Yen, C. James & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2011. "Exploring the Problem-Finding and Problem-Solving Approach for Designing Organizations," Working Papers 11-0107, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    17. Tan, Danchi & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2005. "The Dynamics of Japanese Firm Growth in U.S. Industries: The Penrose Effect," Working Papers 05-0121, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    18. Phares, Jonathan & Miller, Jason W. & Burks, Stephen V., 2023. "State-Level Trucking Employment and the COVID-19 Pandemic in the U.S: Understanding Heterogenous Declines and Rebounds," IZA Discussion Papers 16265, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    20. Jason Miller, 2020. "Why Are Larger Motor Carriers More Compliant with Safety Regulations?," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 28-72, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:59:y:2020:i:2:p:129-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.