IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v56y2017i1p1-34.html

To Survive and Thrive under Hypercompetition: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Strategic Purity on Truckload Motor‐Carrier Financial Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Yao “Henry” Jin
  • David Swanson
  • Matthew Waller
  • John Ozment

Abstract

Easy access to equipment and low barriers to entry have led to an intensely competitive truckload industry in which carriers possess little power to increase prices consistent with inflation. Yet, the heterogeneous performance among TL carriers indicates that sustained success in such a hypercompetitive industry is possible. Under the strategic purity framework, this research adopts a multimethod approach by first utilizing panel of financial and operational data composed of 828 firm‐quarter observations and finds that the relationship between a popular industry metric—the trailer‐to‐tractor ratio (T2T)—and performance is convex. Empirical results are further explained by interviews with senior executives and industry analysts. This research contributes to theory and practice by first showing that, consistent with the strategic management literature, strategy‐driven heterogeneous configuration of common assets may increase performance. Second, we show that strategic purity allows carriers supernormal financial performance, despite the hypercompetitive environment. Third, as the TL industry becomes increasingly conscious of competitive strategies, our study shows that the T2T can be used as a guide for carriers to align their competitive strategy with asset configuration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao “Henry” Jin & David Swanson & Matthew Waller & John Ozment, 2017. "To Survive and Thrive under Hypercompetition: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Strategic Purity on Truckload Motor‐Carrier Financial Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(1), pages 1-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:56:y:2017:i:1:p:1-34
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.56.1.0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.56.1.0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.56.1.0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A Structural Multivariate Probit Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9w1988t7, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Rodrigo A. Britto & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm, 2010. "The Relationship between Motor Carrier Financial Performance and Safety Performance," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 42-51, September.
    4. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    5. Kathryn Dobie, 2005. "The Core Shipper Concept: A Proactive Strategy for Motor Freight Carriers," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 37-53, March.
    6. M. Douglas Voss & Thomas J. Page, & Scott B. Keller & John Ozment, 2006. "Determining Important Carrier Attributes: A Fresh Perspective Using the Theory of Reasoned Action," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 7-19, June.
    7. Yafeng Du & Randolph Hall, 1997. "Fleet Sizing and Empty Equipment Redistribution for Center-Terminal Transportation Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 145-157, February.
    8. Thomas M. Corsi, 1997. "Surface Freight Prospects," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 553(1), pages 186-191, September.
    9. Gebauer, Heiko & Gustafsson, Anders & Witell, Lars, 2011. "Competitive advantage through service differentiation by manufacturing companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1270-1280.
    10. Scheraga, Carl A., 2011. "Strategic fit in the general freight motor carrier industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 490-506, July.
    11. Warren B. Powell & Arun Marar & Jack Gelfand & Steve Bowers, 2002. "Implementing Real-Time Optimization Models: A Case Application From The Motor Carrier Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 571-581, August.
    12. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    13. George A. Shinkle & Aldas P. Kriauciunas & Greg Hundley, 2013. "Why pure strategies may be wrong for transition economy firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(10), pages 1244-1254, October.
    14. George P. Baker & Thomas N. Hubbard, 2003. "Make Versus Buy in Trucking: Asset Ownership, Job Design, and Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 551-572, June.
    15. Harald Hau, 2001. "Location Matters: An Examination of Trading Profits," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(5), pages 1959-1983, October.
    16. Jonathan Turner & Soonhui Lee & Mark Daskin & Tito Homem-de-Mello & Karen Smilowitz, 2012. "Dynamic fleet scheduling with uncertain demand and customer flexibility," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 459-481, November.
    17. Yew Wong, Chee & Karia, Noorliza, 2010. "Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 51-67, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael S. Garver & Zachary Williams, 2025. "Logistics customer service and customer satisfaction: Importance‐based segments for motor carriers," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), January.
    2. Laharish Guntuka & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm & David E. Cantor, 2019. "US Motor‐Carrier Exit: Prevalence and Determinants," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(2), pages 79-100, April.
    3. Tobias Schoenherr, 2018. "Leveraging Suppliers for Product Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Intellectual Capital," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(4), pages 365-398, November.
    4. Simone T. Peinkofer & Matthew A. Schwieterman & Jason W. Miller, 2020. "Last‐Mile Delivery in the Motor‐Carrier Industry: A Panel Data Investigation Using Discrete Time Event History Analysis," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(2), pages 129-164, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinwei Ye & Lei Ma & Junwen Feng & Yang Cheng & Zheng Liu, 2018. "Impact of Technology Habitual Domain on Ambidextrous Innovation: Case Study of a Chinese High-Tech Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Shih-Chang Hung, 2024. "The evolution of innovative capabilities: a longitudinal, embedded case study," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 901-925, December.
    3. Carlo Salvato, 2003. "The Role of Micro‐Strategies in the Engineering of Firm Evolution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 83-108, January.
    4. Berthinier-Poncet, Anne & Podmetina, Daria & Robbins, Peter, 2025. "The art of innovation: How arts-based initiatives can nurture innovation dynamic capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    6. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.
    8. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    9. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    10. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    11. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    12. Mary J. Benner, 2010. "Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 42-62, February.
    13. Lorenz, Steffi, 2015. "Diversität und Verbundenheit der unternehmerischen Wissensbasis: Ein neuartiger Messansatz mit Indikatoren aus Innovationsprojekten," Discussion Papers on Strategy and Innovation 15-01, Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Technology and Innovation Management (TIM).
    14. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    15. Pettus, Michael L. & Kor, Yasemin Y. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "A Theory of Change in Turbulent Environments: The Sequencing of Dynamic Capabilities Following Industry Deregulation," Working Papers 07-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    16. Chang, Kuo-Hsiung & Gotcher, Donald F., 2020. "How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    17. Jolien Roelandt & Petra Andries & Mirjam Knockaert, 2022. "The contribution of board experience to opportunity development in high-tech ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1627-1645, March.
    18. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    19. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    20. Leven J. Zheng & Justin Zuopeng Zhang & Huan Wang & Jacky F. L. Hong, 2025. "Exploring the impact of Big Data Analytics Capabilities on the dual nature of innovative activities in MSMEs: A Data-Agility-Innovation Perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 350(2), pages 699-727, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:56:y:2017:i:1:p:1-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.