IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026is1p572-590.html

The Nonlinear Effect of Board Size and the Moderating Role of Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Vasiliki Papadopoulou
  • Sofia Karagiannopoulou
  • Nikolaos Sariannidis
  • Grigoris Giannarakis

Abstract

This study contributes to the literature by examining the nonlinear effect of board size on environmental and social performance and CSR controversies in European firms, and the role of gender diversity as a moderating mechanism between this relationship. Using data from STOXX Europe 600 Index listed companies from 2007 to 2023 and applying a fixed effects model, empirical results reveal an inverted U‐shaped relationship between board size and environmental and social performance, with an ideal size of 22 members for environmental and 18 for social issues. Gender diversity reduces the negative effects of excessively large boards. Results remain unchanged across robustness tests. The study suggests specific policies for policymakers and corporate managers, including the adoption of European guidelines on optimal board size, financial incentives, and educational programs for female executives.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasiliki Papadopoulou & Sofia Karagiannopoulou & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Grigoris Giannarakis, 2026. "The Nonlinear Effect of Board Size and the Moderating Role of Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance in Europe," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 572-590, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:572-590
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazumi Endo, 2020. "Corporate governance beyond the shareholder–stakeholder dichotomy: Lessons from Japanese corporations' environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1625-1633, May.
    2. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    3. Federica Doni & Antonio Corvino & Silvio Bianchi Martini, 2021. "Corporate governance model, stakeholder engagement and social issues evidence from European oil and gas industry," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 636-662, September.
    4. Yu Li & Tiange Qi & Qiyuan Li & Weijie Tan & Yongjian Huang, 2025. "The Motivation of Corporate Greenwashing: Evidence From Energy Consumption Intensity," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 5234-5250, August.
    5. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar & Lara Al‐Haddad, 2023. "Corporate environmental disclosure and earnings management—The moderating role of corporate governance structures," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2789-2810, July.
    7. Morten Huse & Sabina Nielsen & Inger Hagen, 2009. "Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 581-597, November.
    8. Giuseppe Nicolo' & Francisco Javier Andrades‐Peña, 2024. "Does corporate governance influence environmental, social and governance disclosure practices of state‐owned enterprises? An international study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4715-4731, September.
    9. Abid Hussain & Heidi Vander Bauwhede & Philippe Van Cauwenberge, 2025. "Board Characteristics and Sustainable Development Goal Disclosures in Pakistan," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7863-7875, October.
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Karaman, Abdullah S. & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali, 2020. "Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Mustafa Disli & Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz & Farah Finn Mohamud Mohamed, 2022. "Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 929-952, January.
    12. Mustafa Disli & Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz & Farah Finn Mohamud Mohamed, 2022. "Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 929-952, January.
    13. Lorenzo Ardito & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, 2021. "The link between female representation in the boards of directors and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from B corps," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 704-720, March.
    14. Patrick Velte, 2024. "Sustainable board governance and environmental performance: European evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3397-3421, May.
    15. Marina Brogi & Valentina Lagasio, 2025. "Do Corporate Governance Frameworks Affect Sustainability Reporting?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3928-3943, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasiliki Papadopoulou & Sofia Karagiannopoulou & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Grigoris Giannarakis, 2026. "Unmasking Independent Directors: Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy as a Mediator of ESG Controversies in European Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1031-1046, January.
    2. Sofia Karagiannopoulou & Andreas Andronikidis & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Grigoris Giannarakis, 2025. "Is Board Gender Diversity a Superficial Goal or a Strategic Asset for CSR Performance? The Role of Critical Mass and Board Size," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8674-8687, November.
    3. Babajide Oyewo & Olayinka Moses & Nurlan Orazalin, 2025. "Board Gender Diversity and Carbon Trade Finance: Evidence From Multinational Corporations on the Role of Institutional Quality and Cultural Environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4165-4190, May.
    4. Geovane Camilo dos Santos & Camila Lima Bazani & Pablo Zambra, 2026. "Beyond Profit: Do Mergers and Acquisitions and the Board of Directors Increase the Environmental, Social, and Governance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7459-7483, July.
    5. Abednego Osei & Maxwell Kongkuah & Michael Ayikwei Quarshie, 2025. "Redefining corporate accountability for sustainable development: the strategic nexus of innovation and governance mechanisms in building institutional resilience," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(12), pages 1-31, December.
    6. Kuzey, Cemil & Fritz, Morgane M.C. & Uyar, Ali & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2022. "Board gender diversity, CSR strategy, and eco-friendly initiatives in the transportation and logistics sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Davide Sandretto & Alessandro Rizzi & Gabriella Esposito, 2025. "Gender Diversity Leadership and ESG Performance: The Influence of Women on Boards and in Management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 5075-5094, May.
    8. Vincenzo Basile & Luana Serino & Antonello D’ Ambra & Francesco Campanella, 2026. "Board characteristics and effects on ESG performance: empirical evidence from the European banking system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 2121-2138, February.
    9. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    10. Abusharbeh, Mohammed & Hanaysha, Jalal Rajeh & Samara, Husni, 2025. "The interactive effect of environmental management team with board attributes on sustainability pillars: Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Shahrina Md Nordin & Nor Izzah Mokhtar & Unggul Priyadi & Tarjo Tarjo & Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad & Ammar Redza Ahmad Rizal, 2023. "Communicating Sustainable Brand Equity in a High Carbon Footprint and High-Risk Sector: Comparing Malaysia and Indonesia Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Mehmood, Asad & De Luca, Francesco & Quach, Hao, 2023. "Investigating how board gender diversity affects environmental, social and governance performance: Evidence from the utilities sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    13. Ines Ben Mehrez & Aymen Ajina & Amel Farhat, 2026. "Board Characteristics and Climate Commitment: A Comprehensive Analysis Unraveling Linear and Nonlinear Relationships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2243-2265, February.
    14. Luo, Yating & Zhang, Naiqian & Tong, Tong & Jia, Xiaofei, 2025. "Unveiling the four-pillar framework: Machine learning evidence on personality, firm, governance, and financial origins of managerial overconfidence in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Manzhi Liu & Jia Lu & Chen Zhao & Jie Luo & Qiyao Liu & Hui Wang & Shuting Fang & Yaxin Yang, 2025. "Antecedents and consequences of environmental, social, and governance: A bibliometric analysis based on the Web of Science database," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 984-1001, January.
    16. Nurshahirah Abd Majid & Amar Hisham Jaaffar, 2023. "The Effect of Women’s Leadership on Carbon Disclosure by the Top 100 Global Energy Leaders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Yakira Fernández-Torres & Clara Gallego-Sosa & Milagros Gutiérrez-Fernández, 2025. "Do women board members contribute to companies’ superior environmental performance? A literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1513-1565, May.
    18. Wang, Xincheng & Zhang, Xuewei & Zhang, Sujuan, 2026. "Communist CEOs and corporate sustainability: Unpacking the interplay of ideology, innovation, and power," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Wu Ning & Ummar Faruk Saeed & Maxwell Kongkuah, 2025. "Saving the Environment in Emerging Markets: The Synergistic Roles of Corporate Ownership Structure, Financing Strategy, and Innovation Capacity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 5114-5138, May.
    20. Ying Zhang & Yuting Guo & Aiman Nurdazym, 2023. "How do female CEOs affect corporate environmental policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 459-472, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:s1:p:572-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.