IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i5p7459-7483.html

Beyond Profit: Do Mergers and Acquisitions and the Board of Directors Increase the Environmental, Social, and Governance?

Author

Listed:
  • Geovane Camilo dos Santos
  • Camila Lima Bazani
  • Pablo Zambra

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between mergers and acquisitions (M&A), board characteristics, and ESG performance in BRICS companies, considering the moderating role of sectoral sensitivity. The study analyzes 11,402 observations from 2293 BRICS companies, employing Two‐Stage Least Squares (2SLS) to address endogeneity and logistic regression models. M&A shows a positive and significant association with all ESG pillars, reinforcing its contribution to nonfinancial performance. Board characteristics also shape these outcomes: larger and more independent boards enhance environmental and social performance, while CEO duality weakens governance results. The sensitive‐sector dummy is insignificant, indicating that sector classification alone does not raise ESG scores. However, the M&A—sensitive‐sector interaction is positive across environmental models, suggesting that firms strengthen environmental practices after M&A. For social outcomes the interaction is insignificant, and for governance, it is significant only at 10%, revealing weaker effects. This study introduces a novel perspective by integrating M&A activity, board characteristics, and sector sensitivity into a unified analysis of ESG performance. Existing research does not explicitly assess how industry conditions shape the transfer and generation of ESG value through M&A. By comparing firms in sensitive and nonsensitive sectors, this study demonstrates that sector‐specific pressures meaningfully alter the ESG effects of corporate transactions and governance structures. This approach advances the understanding of how organizational decisions interact with contextual factors to produce differentiated ESG outcomes, offering insights unavailable in prior single‐context or noncomparative studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Geovane Camilo dos Santos & Camila Lima Bazani & Pablo Zambra, 2026. "Beyond Profit: Do Mergers and Acquisitions and the Board of Directors Increase the Environmental, Social, and Governance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7459-7483, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7459-7483
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70534
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martins, Henrique Castro, 2022. "Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    2. Kazumi Endo, 2020. "Corporate governance beyond the shareholder–stakeholder dichotomy: Lessons from Japanese corporations' environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1625-1633, May.
    3. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    4. Marian H. Amin & Heba Ali & Ehab K. A. Mohamed, 2025. "Does industry sensitivity affect the relationship between board diversity and ESG performance? Fresh evidence from the G-7 countries," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(3), pages 732-755, February.
    5. Iman Harymawan & Fajar Kristanto Gautama Putra & Bayu Arie Fianto & Wan Adibah Wan Ismail, 2021. "Financially Distressed Firms: Environmental, Social, and Governance Reporting in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Mustafa Disli & Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz & Farah Finn Mohamud Mohamed, 2022. "Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 929-952, January.
    7. Mustafa Disli & Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz & Farah Finn Mohamud Mohamed, 2022. "Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 929-952, January.
    8. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong Hwan Lee & Ryan Byun, 2018. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Haoming Ding & Zerui Wang & Hanyu Xu & Zi Lin, 2024. "A Study on the Impact of Board Characteristics on the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Responsibilities of Listed Companies—Evidence from Chinese Listings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Su, Han Chan & Kensinger, John W. & Keown, Arthur J. & Martin, John D., 1997. "Do strategic alliances create value?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 199-221, November.
    11. Ting-Ting Li & Kai Wang & Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Derek D. Wang, 2021. "ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Marion Dupire & Bouchra M’Zali, 2018. "CSR Strategies in Response to Competitive Pressures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 603-623, March.
    13. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    14. Robert G. Eccles & George Serafeim, 2013. "A Tale of Two Stories: Sustainability and the Quarterly Earnings Call," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 25(3), pages 8-19, September.
    15. Ching-Chung Lin & Tran Phuoc Nguyen, 2022. "Board attributes and corporate social responsibility performance: evidence from Vietnam," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2087461-208, December.
    16. Jeremy Galbreath, 2013. "ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 529-541, December.
    17. Francesco Grimaldi & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito & Massimo Mariani, 2020. "Sustainability Engagement and Earnings Management: The Italian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Mohammad Jizi & Aly Salama & Robert Dixon & Rebecca Stratling, 2014. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 601-615, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasiliki Papadopoulou & Sofia Karagiannopoulou & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Grigoris Giannarakis, 2026. "Unmasking Independent Directors: Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy as a Mediator of ESG Controversies in European Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1031-1046, January.
    2. Farah Mneimneh & Michel Kodsi & Marc Chamoun & Mohammad Basharoush & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2023. "How Can Green Energy Technology Innovations Improve the Carbon-Related Environmental Dimension of ESG Rating?," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2183-2199, December.
    3. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    4. Qin Lingda Tan & Sharizal Hashim & Zhangwei Zheng, 2025. "Environmental Social Governance (ESG) in Digitalization research: A bibliometric analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440241, January.
    5. D’Ecclesia, Rita Laura & Levantesi, Susanna & Stefanelli, Kevyn, 2024. "Measuring business impacts on the sustainability of European-listed firms," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    7. Mohammad I. Jizi & Mahmoud Arayssi, 2026. "Do investors value GCC firms’ social performance?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 23-35, March.
    8. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L., 2023. "Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations?☆," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    9. Antonios Persakis, 2024. "The impact of climate policy uncertainty on ESG performance, carbon emission intensity and firm performance: evidence from Fortune 1000 firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 24031-24081, September.
    10. Mishra, Geeti & Patro, Archana & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2024. "Does climate governance moderate the relationship between ESG reporting and firm value? Empirical evidence from India," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 920-941.
    11. Goretti Cabaleiro-Cerviño & Pedro Mendi, 2024. "ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 137-185, March.
    12. Vasiliki Papadopoulou & Sofia Karagiannopoulou & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Grigoris Giannarakis, 2026. "The Nonlinear Effect of Board Size and the Moderating Role of Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance in Europe," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 572-590, January.
    13. Hayam Wahba & Heba B. Hathout, 2026. "Do board characteristics moderate the relationship between ESG and financial performance? Evidence from African listed companies," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    15. Linzhi Han & Yafang Shi & Jianghua Zheng, 2024. "Can green credit policies improve corporate ESG performance?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2678-2699, June.
    16. Muhammad Sani Khamisu & Achuta Ratna Paluri, 2025. "What’s past is prologue: reminiscing research on environment social governance (ESG) disclosures," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 320-340, June.
    17. Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Raffaella Montera & Sabrina Leo & Francesco Laviola & Pietro Vito & Domenico Sardanelli & Gianpaolo Basile & Giulia Nevi & Raffaele Alaia, 2024. "Trends and patterns in ESG research: A bibliometric odyssey and research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3703-3723, September.
    18. Mutalib Anifowose, 2026. "Evidence of the impact of corporate governance on ESG disclosure in sub-Saharan Africa: the moderating role of ownership structure," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 283-304, June.
    19. Hansol Choi & Hyemi Lee, 2025. "A Meta‐Analytic Review of the Relationship Between Environmental Dimensions of ESG Management and Purchase Intentions in South Korea," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8367-8379, December.
    20. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance reporting in family firms: The critical role of CEO attributes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 70-87, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7459-7483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.