Author
Listed:
- Babajide Oyewo
- Olayinka Moses
- Nurlan Orazalin
Abstract
This study investigates whether board gender diversity influences carbon trade finance and ultimately achieves decarbonisation targets. Using a dataset of 5198 firm‐year observations from 336 multinational corporations (MNCs) spanning 42 industries and 32 countries over the period 2006–2022, we employ panel regression analysis to uncover key insights. Our findings reveal that although board gender diversity is positively associated with carbon trade finance, a critical mass of at least four female board directors is necessary to exert significant influence. Our results highlight the critical role of institutional factors, such as high control of corruption, strong voice and accountability, government effectiveness and a strong rule of law, in enhancing the impact of board gender diversity on carbon trade finance. Additionally, cultural environments play a pivotal role in shaping the relationship between board gender diversity and carbon trade finance. Our main conclusions are robust across alternative measures and validated using two‐stage least squares and propensity score matching techniques. We contribute to the literature on board gender diversity and carbon trade finance by empirically demonstrating the role of (in)formal institutional factors that influence the effectiveness of female directors in achieving sustainability outcomes. The findings offer valuable policy and practical implications for managers, regulators and stakeholders, shedding light on the interplay among board gender diversity, carbon emissions management, and the governance and cultural contexts at the country level.
Suggested Citation
Babajide Oyewo & Olayinka Moses & Nurlan Orazalin, 2025.
"Board Gender Diversity and Carbon Trade Finance: Evidence From Multinational Corporations on the Role of Institutional Quality and Cultural Environment,"
Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4165-4190, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4165-4190
DOI: 10.1002/bse.4180
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4165-4190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.