IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i2p1782-1796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green hotspots? Unveiling global hotspots and shifting trends in carbon credit projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mark M. Akrofi

Abstract

This study examines the spatiotemporal patterns of verified carbon credit projects from 2004 to 2022, utilizing data from the Gold Standard Foundation (GSF) registry and employing spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) and hot spot analysis (Getis‐Ord Gi*) in ArcGIS Pro. South Asia and East Africa emerged as key hotspots for carbon credit projects. Hotspots transitioned from China, Brazil, Peru, Panama, and Cambodia (2004–2016) to India, Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda (2017–2022) with Turkey remaining a hotspot throughout the period. Overall, the analysis reveals a statistically significant Moran's I of 0.07 and a z‐score of 3.04, indicating spatial clustering of projects and a less than 1% likelihood that the clustering is a result of random chance. The spatial pattern and types of projects align with socio‐economic conditions and environmental protection objectives in different regions. Domestic energy efficiency projects are prevalent, such as improved cookstoves, biogas digesters, and borehole technologies for safe water access. These findings prompt the deduction that socio‐economic conditions wield substantial influence on investor preferences in carbon credit projects. Hence, the study contends that the overarching goal transcends mere carbon emissions mitigation; it extends to elevating the socio‐economic well‐being of local populations. By pinpointing geographical hotspots and elucidating temporal shifts, this study equips stakeholders with strategic insights into investment in carbon credit projects and highlights evolving investor interests in the carbon credit landscape, bridging the gap between environmental objectives and socio‐economic imperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark M. Akrofi, 2025. "Green hotspots? Unveiling global hotspots and shifting trends in carbon credit projects," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1782-1796, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:1782-1796
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3209
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaohua Song & Wen Zhang & Zeqi Ge & Siqi Huang & Yamin Huang & Sijia Xiong, 2022. "A Study of the Influencing Factors on the Carbon Emission Trading Price in China Based on the Improved Gray Relational Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Danny Cassimon & Peter‐Jan Engelen & Linda Peters & Martin Prowse, 2023. "Valuing investments in the Global Carbon Market Mechanism as compound real options: Lessons from the Clean Development Mechanism," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3443-3458, October.
    3. Thales A. P. West & Sven Wunder & Erin O. Sills & Jan Borner & Sami W. Rifai & Alexandra N. Neidermeier & Andreas Kontoleon, 2023. "Action needed to make carbon offsets from tropical forest conservation work for climate change mitigation," Papers 2301.03354, arXiv.org.
    4. Sevil Acar & Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı & A. Erinç Yeldan, 2022. "Potential effects of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkish economy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8162-8194, June.
    5. Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Abiola Oluwasogo Oyediran & Gbemisola Koriko & Liyaning Maggie Tang, 2024. "Carbon trading practices adoption for sustainable construction: A study of the barriers in a developing country," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1120-1136, February.
    6. Fujii, Hidemichi & Webb, Jeremy & Mundree, Sagadevan & Rowlings, David & Grace, Peter & Wilson, Clevo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2024. "Priority change and driving factors in the voluntary carbon offset market," MPRA Paper 120657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Axel Michaelowa & Lukas Hermwille & Wolfgang Obergassel & Sonja Butzengeiger, 2019. "Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1211-1224, November.
    8. Wytze van der Gaast & Richard Sikkema & Moriz Vohrer, 2018. "The contribution of forest carbon credit projects to addressing the climate change challenge," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 42-48, January.
    9. Fanlue Li & Ke He & Run Zhu & Junbiao Zhang & Ming Gao, 2023. "Rural low‐carbon energy development in the information age: Can internet access drive the farmer to participate in personal carbon trading schemes related to bioenergy?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1417-1432, June.
    10. Azlan Amran & Zainorfarah Zainuddin & Suhaiza Hanim Mohamad Zailani, 2013. "Carbon Trading in Malaysia: Review of Policies and Practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 183-192, May.
    11. Emmanuel Eze & Alexander Siegmund, 2024. "Identifying disaster risk factors and hotspots in Africa from spatiotemporal decadal analyses using INFORM data for risk reduction and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4020-4041, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin S. Thompson, 2023. "Impact investing in biodiversity conservation with bonds: An analysis of financial and environmental risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 353-368, January.
    2. N. K. Kurichev & A. V. Ptichnikov & E. A. Shvarts & A. N. Krenke, 2023. "Nature-Based Offsets in Russia: Key Challenges and Conditions for Success," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 595-608, December.
    3. Cary, Michael, 2023. "Climate policy boosts trade competitiveness: Evidence from timber trade networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Fan, Dian & Chen, Shaoqing, 2024. "No pain, no gain? Simulation of carbon reduction potential and socioeconomic effects of voluntary carbon trading in China during 2021–2060," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    5. Ben Groom & Frank Venmans, 2025. "The Social Value of Temporary Carbon Removals and Delayed Emissions," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 169-212.
    6. Hongyang Li & Shuying Fang & Long Chen & Vanessa Menadue & Skitmore Martin, 2024. "Extended reality (XR)—A magic box of digitalization in driving sustainable development of the construction industry: A critical review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2830-2845, June.
    7. Lauren Gifford, 2020. "“You can’t value what you can’t measure”: a critical look at forest carbon accounting," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 291-306, July.
    8. Klimašauskaitė, Aistė & Drivdal, Laura Elisabet & Larsen, Håkon & Nedelciu, Claudiu Eduard, 2024. "Could deep-sea mining sustain sustainability? The international seabed authority and the UN 2030 agenda," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Pone Salimath & Raeyeong Kim & Jewel Andoh & Yohan Lee & Jae Bong Chang, 2024. "Factors Influencing Forest Resource Conservation Behavior of the Youth in Northern Uplands, Lao People’s Democratic Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Ellie-Anne Jones & Lisa Paige & Albany Smith & Annabelle Worth & Lois Betts & Richard Stafford, 2024. "Potential for Carbon Credits from Conservation Management: Price and Potential for Multi-Habitat Nature-Based Carbon Sequestration in Dorset, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Jennifer Helgeson & Cheyney O’Fallon, 2021. "Resilience Dividends and Resilience Windfalls: Narratives That Tie Disaster Resilience Co-Benefits to Long-Term Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Nan Shang & Guori Huang & Yuan Leng & Jihong Zhang & Angxing Shen, 2023. "Time Limit of Environmental Benefits of Renewable Energy Power Projects—Analysis Based on Monte Carlo Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Hou, Guolong & Delang, Claudio O. & Lu, Xixi & Olschewski, Roland, 2020. "Optimizing rotation periods of forest plantations: The effects of carbon accounting regimes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Leonie Netter & Eike Luedeling & Cory Whitney, 2022. "Agroforestry and reforestation with the Gold Standard-Decision Analysis of a voluntary carbon offset label," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Filewod, Ben & McCarney, Geoff, 2023. "Avoiding leakage from nature-based offsets by design," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117927, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Brais Suárez-Eiroa & David Soto-Oñate & María Loureiro, 2024. "The responsibility of the EU in climate change mitigation: assessing the fairness of its recent targets," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(8), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Flammer, Caroline & Giroux, Thomas & Heal, Geoffrey M., 2025. "Biodiversity finance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Shiwei Peng & Kaixin Qiu & Bowei Yang & Jifeng Ai & An Zhou, 2024. "Experimental Study on the Durability Performance of Sustainable Mortar with Partial Replacement of Natural Aggregates by Fiber-Reinforced Agricultural Waste Walnut Shells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    19. Haijun Liu & Yang Wu & Dongqing Tan & Yi Chen & Haoran Wang, 2024. "CGAOA-AttBiGRU: A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Forecasting CO 2 Emissions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-30, September.
    20. Hisky Ryan Kawulur & Erwin Saraswati & Abdul Ghofar & Arum Prastiwi, 2024. "Carbon Strategy, Political Connection and Carbon Performance: Evidence from Polluting Industries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 251-264, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:1782-1796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.