IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14687-d1256808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time Limit of Environmental Benefits of Renewable Energy Power Projects—Analysis Based on Monte Carlo Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Shang

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Guori Huang

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Yuan Leng

    (Energy Development Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China)

  • Jihong Zhang

    (Institute of Quality Development Strategy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Angxing Shen

    (Institute of Quality Development Strategy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

The supply of green electricity certificates (GECs) exceeds the demand, leading to companies being more willing to purchase GECs to meet their emission reduction obligations. However, concerns have been raised about the environmental impact of renewable energy (RE) projects labeled as “greenwashing”. Drawing on the “additionality” theory, we developed a cost model with construction, operation, and discount rates. We utilized cost data from China’s onshore wind and photovoltaic power generation in our study. After 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, we made the following findings: (1) The environmental benefits of RE power generation diminish over time, and the time limit for judging whether RE projects have additional costs compared with traditional thermal power should be considered; (2) The time limit for marginal environmental effects of China’s onshore wind and photovoltaic power generation is estimated to be 7.65–10.78 years and 5.44–7.25 years, respectively. The analysis methods and ideas proposed in this paper can provide reference for the development of the GEC system in China and even other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Shang & Guori Huang & Yuan Leng & Jihong Zhang & Angxing Shen, 2023. "Time Limit of Environmental Benefits of Renewable Energy Power Projects—Analysis Based on Monte Carlo Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14687-:d:1256808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verbruggen, Aviel, 2004. "Tradable green certificates in Flanders (Belgium)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 165-176, January.
    2. Ming-Zhi Gao, Anton & Fan, Chien-Te & Kai, Ji-Jung & Liao, Chao-Ning, 2015. "Sustainable photovoltaic technology development: step-by-step guidance for countries facing PV proliferation turmoil under the feed-in tariff scheme," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 156-163.
    3. John Paul Helveston & Gang He & Michael R. Davidson, 2023. "Author Correction: Quantifying the cost savings of global solar photovoltaic supply chains," Nature, Nature, vol. 618(7965), pages 24-24, June.
    4. Wayne Moodaley & Arnesh Telukdarie, 2023. "Greenwashing, Sustainability Reporting, and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Wang, Yao & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Performance of alternative electricity prices on residential welfare in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Axel Michaelowa & Lukas Hermwille & Wolfgang Obergassel & Sonja Butzengeiger, 2019. "Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1211-1224, November.
    7. Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & Colpaert, Jan & Cooman, Gert, 2013. "The best time to invest in photovoltaic panels in Flanders," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 348-358.
    8. Orestis Delardas & Panagiotis Giannos, 2022. "Towards Energy Transition: Use of Blockchain in Renewable Certificates to Support Sustainability Commitments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Lambert Schneider, 2009. "Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 242-254, May.
    10. Gillenwater, Michael, 2013. "Probabilistic decision model of wind power investment and influence of green power market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1111-1125.
    11. Gillenwater, Michael & Lu, Xi & Fischlein, Miriam, 2014. "Additionality of wind energy investments in the U.S. voluntary green power market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 452-457.
    12. Timilsina, Govinda R., 2021. "Are renewable energy technologies cost competitive for electricity generation?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 658-672.
    13. Johnson, R.C. & Mayfield, M., 2020. "The economic and environmental implications of post feed-in tariff PV on constrained low voltage networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    14. Ye, Liang-Cheng & Rodrigues, João F.D. & Lin, Hai Xiang, 2017. "Analysis of feed-in tariff policies for solar photovoltaic in China 2011–2016," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 496-505.
    15. Zhang, Ruixiaoxiao & Shimada, Koji & Ni, Meng & Shen, Geoffrey Q.P. & Wong, Johnny K.W., 2020. "Low or No subsidy? Proposing a regional power grid based wind power feed-in tariff benchmark price mechanism in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Daisuke Hayashi & Axel Michaelowa, 2013. "Standardization of baseline and additionality determination under the CDM," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 191-209, March.
    17. Abdullah Isam Qubbaj & Angel Peiró-Signes & Mohammad Najjar, 2023. "The Effect of Green Certificates on the Purchasing Decisions of Online Customers in Green Hotels: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.
    2. Misato Sato & Marta Ciszawska & Timothy Laing, 2016. "Demand for offsetting and insetting in the EU Emissions Trading System," GRI Working Papers 237, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    3. Galzi, Pierre-Yves, 2023. "Do green electricity consumers contribute to the increase in electricity generation capacity from renewable energy sources? Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Kumar, Indraneel & Tyner, Wallace E. & Labi, Samuel & Sinha, Kumares C., 2021. "“The Answer My Friend is Blowin’ in the Wind”: A stochastic assessment of wind farms financial feasibility and economic efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Nie, Yan & Zhang, Guoxing & Zhong, Luhao & Su, Bin & Xi, Xi, 2024. "Urban‒rural disparities in household energy and electricity consumption under the influence of electricity price reform policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2015. "Industrial Photovoltaic Systems: An Economic Analysis in Non-Subsidized Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Reinhard Madlener & Weiyu Gao & Ilja Neustadt & Peter Zweifel, 2008. "Promoting renewable electricity generation in imperfect markets: price vs. quantity policies," SOI - Working Papers 0809, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich.
    8. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Biondi, Tommaso & Moretto, Michele, 2015. "Solar Grid Parity dynamics in Italy: A real option approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 293-302.
    10. Francesco Macheda, 2025. "China’s Road towards Decarbonization: Unrealistic Promise or a Credible Commitment?," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 354-382, July.
    11. Ftiti, Zied & Awijen, Haithem & Ben Ameur, Hachmi & Louhichi, Wael, 2025. "Understanding the drivers of energy capacity transitions: New evidence from a dual approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Liu, Chang & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Dayong & Fu, Jiasha, 2021. "How does the capital market respond to policy shocks? Evidence from listed solar photovoltaic companies in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Xiong, Yongqing & Yang, Xiaohan, 2016. "Government subsidies for the Chinese photovoltaic industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 111-119.
    14. Konstantinos Velaoras & Angeliki N. Menegaki & Serafeim Polyzos & Katerina Gotzamani, 2025. "The Role of Environmental Certification in the Hospitality Industry: Assessing Sustainability, Consumer Preferences, and the Economic Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-31, January.
    15. K.C., Bevin & Verma, Ashu, 2023. "Decentralized local electricity market model using Automated Market Maker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    16. Frédéric Branger & Oskar Lecuyer & Philippe Quirion, 2015. "The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 9-16, January.
    17. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Ho-Chin Yang, 2021. "Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    18. John C.V. Pezzey & Salim Mazouz & Frank Jotzo, 2010. "The logic of collective action and Australia's climate policy ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(2), pages 185-202, April.
    19. Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Xinglong Liu & Zongwei Liu, 2022. "A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    20. de la Hoz, Jordi & Martín, Helena & Miret, Jaume & Castilla, Miguel & Guzman, Ramon, 2016. "Evaluating the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework applied to the grid connected PV systems in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 329-344.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14687-:d:1256808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.