IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v17y1997i4p419-425.html

Life Years Lost at Hazardous Waste Sites: Remediation Worker Fatalities vs. Cancer Deaths to Nearby Residents

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua T. Cohen
  • Barbara D. Beck
  • Ruthann Rudel

Abstract

We present a hypothetical case study using the Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) metric to compare cancer risks incurred by residents living near a Superfund site to occupational fatality risks incurred by workers employed in that site's remediation. Since cancer occurs late in life, and because we assume its mortality rate is 60%, each case results in 8.8 YPLL. Each occupational fatality, which typically occurs earlier in life, results in 38.1 YPLL. In our case study, the residential population of 5000 incurred 1.3 YPLL, compared to 5.7 YPLL incurred by the 500 workers. Several uncertain assumptions may influence our calculations; moreover, occupational risks may be viewed as more “voluntary” than risks incurred by residents. However, because the magnitude of the YPLL incurred by workers and residents may be comparable, risk managers should consider occupational risks when evaluating remedial alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua T. Cohen & Barbara D. Beck & Ruthann Rudel, 1997. "Life Years Lost at Hazardous Waste Sites: Remediation Worker Fatalities vs. Cancer Deaths to Nearby Residents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 419-425, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:4:p:419-425
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00882.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00882.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00882.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan F. Hoskin & J. Paul Leigh & Thomas W. Planek, 1994. "Estimated Risk of Occupational Fatalities Associated with Hazardous Waste Site Remediation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(6), pages 1011-1017, December.
    2. W. F. Ten Berge & P. J. M. Stallen, 1995. "How to Compare the Risk Assessments for Accidental and Chronic Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 111-113, April.
    3. Jonathan A. Lesser & Richard O. Zerbe, 1994. "Discounting procedures for environmental (and other) projects: A comment on Kolb and Scheraga," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 140-156.
    4. Moore, Michael J. & Viscusi, W. Kip, 1990. "Discounting environmental health risks: New evidence and policy implications," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 51-62, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Hofstetter & Jane C. Bare & James K. Hammitt & Patricia A. Murphy & Glenn E. Rice, 2002. "Tools for Comparative Analysis of Alternatives: Competing or Complementary Perspectives?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 833-851, October.
    2. Floyd J. Frost & Joseph Chwirka & Gunther F. Craun & Bruce Thomson & John Stomp, 2002. "Physical Injury Risks Associated with Drinking Water Arsenic Treatment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 235-243, April.
    3. Michael Gochfeld, 2004. "Risk‐Risk Balancing for Hazardous Waste Workers: Alternative Work, Traffic Fatalities, and Unemployment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 347-348, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, Richard A. & Brown, Robert N., 1991. "Health And Safety Regulation Of Small, High-Risk Subpopulations," Working Papers 115914, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    2. Arthur E. Attema & Han Bleichrodt & Olivier L’Haridon & Patrick Peretti-Watel & Valérie Seror, 2018. "Discounting health and money: New evidence using a more robust method," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 117-140, April.
    3. Marek Giergiczny, 2008. "Value of a Statistical Life—the Case of Poland," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 209-221, October.
    4. K. R. Shanmugam, 2011. "Discount Rate for Health Benefits and the Value of Life in India," Working Papers id:4524, eSocialSciences.
    5. Agee, Mark D. & Crocker, Thomas D., 2002. "On Techniques to Value the Impact of Environmental Hazards on Children's Health," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 280801, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    6. Agamoni Majumder & S. Madheswaran, 2022. "Discounting Long-Term Job-Related Health Risks in the Context of Indian Workers," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(4), pages 1099-1120, December.
    7. Ábrahám, Árpád & Kaderják, Péter & Pál, Gabriella, 2005. "A csökkenő halálozási és baleseti kockázat közgazdasági értéke Magyarországon. Egy munkaerő-piaci elemzés eredményei [The economic value of falling risk of death and accident in Hungary. Findings of a labour-market analysis]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 231-248.
    8. Ludwig, Jens & Cook, Philip J, 2001. "The Benefits of Reducing Gun Violence: Evidence from Contingent-Valuation Survey Data," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 207-226, May.
    9. Bellavance, Franois & Dionne, Georges & Lebeau, Martin, 2009. "The value of a statistical life: A meta-analysis with a mixed effects regression model," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 444-464, March.
    10. Martin Luckert & Wiktor Adamowicz, 1993. "Empirical measures of factors affecting social rates of discount," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Richard O. Zerbe, 2013. "Ethical benefit–cost analysis as art and science: ten rules for benefit–cost analysis," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 8, pages 264-293, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Robert John Zagar & James Garbarino & Brad Randmark & Ishup Singh & Joseph Kovach & Emma Cenzon & Michael Benko & Steve Tippins & Kenneth G. Busch, 2022. "A Review of the Costs of Assault, Homicide, Mass Murder and Pedophilia with Implications for the Insurance Industry and the U.S. Roman Catholic Church: A Rationale for Using Computer Tests and Machine Learning Equations," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, March.
    13. Andrea Baranzini & Giovanni Ferro Luzzi, 2001. "The Economic Value of Risks to Life: Evidence from the Swiss Labour Market," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 137(2), pages 149-170, June.
    14. Gabriel Picone & Frank Sloan & Donald Taylor, 2004. "Effects of Risk and Time Preference and Expected Longevity on Demand for Medical Tests," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 39-53, January.
    15. David Pearce & Ben Groom & Cameron Hepburn & Phoebe Koundouri, 2003. "Valuing the Future: Recent advances in social discounting," DEOS Working Papers 0308, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    16. Georges Dionne & Paul Lanoie, 2002. "How to Make a Public Choice About the Value of a Statistical Life: The Case of Road Safety," Cahiers de recherche 02-04, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
    17. Fredslund, Eskild Klausen & Mørkbak, Morten Raun & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, 2018. "Different domains – Different time preferences?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 97-105.
    18. Horowitz, John K., 1996. "Environmental policy under a non-market discount rate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 73-78, January.
    19. Paul Hallwood, 2018. "The Confederacy and the American Civil War, 1861-1865: Greed Or Grievance?," Working papers 2018-18, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    20. James K. Hammitt & Jin-Tan Liu & Jin-Long Liu, 2022. "Is survival a luxury good? Income elasticity of the value per statistical life," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 239-260, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:4:p:419-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.