IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v44y2023i2p960-977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of four participants in green technology innovation system

Author

Listed:
  • Li Liu
  • Zhe Wang
  • Zhao Song
  • Zaisheng Zhang

Abstract

To study the sustainable development of the green technology innovation system (GTIS), more and more people have begun to pay attention to the behavior evolution and strategic choice of participants. This paper develops a four‐participant evolutionary game model to study the interaction and behavior evolution of government, financial institutions, enterprises, and the public on green technology innovation (GTI), determines the payoff matrix of GTIS, derives replicator dynamic equations, calculates evolutionary stability strategies (ESSs) of participants, and identifies evolution paths of ESSs through numerical simulations. The findings show that in most cases, the government prefers to adopt “weak supervision” strategies to regulate the market, and the public prefers to adopt “supervision” strategies to supervise enterprises. Encouraging enterprises to implement GTI through subsidies and funding support is a vital means in the initial stage of sustainable development. It is imperative to establish a multi‐participant collaborative governance mechanism to promote the sustained and sound GTIS development.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Liu & Zhe Wang & Zhao Song & Zaisheng Zhang, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of four participants in green technology innovation system," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 960-977, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:2:p:960-977
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3724
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Wang & Yingchen Yan & Huibin Du & Ruiqing Zhao, 2020. "The optimal sales format for green products considering downstream investment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1107-1126, February.
    2. Lukas, Elmar & Welling, Andreas, 2014. "Timing and eco(nomic) efficiency of climate-friendly investments in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 448-457.
    3. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    4. David Popp, 2012. "The Role of Technological Change in Green Growth," NBER Working Papers 18506, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    6. David F. Drake & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2016. "Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 1006-1025, June.
    7. David N. Weil & Oded Galor, 2000. "Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 806-828, September.
    8. Geng, Ruoqi & Mansouri, S. Afshin & Aktas, Emel, 2017. "The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 245-258.
    9. Yina Li & Yang Tong & Fei Ye & Jiajia Song, 2020. "The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs. product subsidy," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(16), pages 4932-4946, July.
    10. Yang, Rui & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 553-568.
    11. Popp, David, 2012. "The role of technological change in green growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6239, The World Bank.
    12. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    13. Yi Zheng & Gaoxun Zhang & Weiwei Zhang, 2018. "A Duopoly Manufacturers’ Game Model Considering Green Technology Investment under a Cap-and-Trade System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Kopp, Raymond J. & Smith, V. Kerry, 1980. "Environmental regulation and optimal investment behavior : A micro-economic analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 211-224, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Zangiabadi, Maryam & Hafezi, Maryam, 2023. "How much is enough? Government subsidies in supporting green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1316-1333.
    2. Zheng, Shiyuan & Jiang, Changmin & Fu, Xiaowen & Ge, Ying-En & Shu, Jia, 2022. "Subsidies for green technology adoption under uncertain demand and incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Li Liu & Zhe Wang & Jiangtao Xu & Zaisheng Zhang, 2023. "Green baton: how government interventions advance green technological innovation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11121-11152, October.
    4. Junjian Wu & Jennifer Shang, 2021. "Optimal Green Operation and Information Leakage Decisions under Government Subsidy and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Zhong, Yuanguang & Yang, Tong & Yu, Huilin & Zhong, Shuneng & Xie, Wei, 2023. "Impacts of blockchain technology with government subsidies on a dual-channel supply chain for tracing product information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Jingpei Ma & Xuejun Sun, 2023. "Green technology licensing: Evaluating government subsidies based on different efficiency levels across competitors," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1920-1934, June.
    7. Limin Su & Yongchao Cao & Wenjuan Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Operation Decisions and Coordination Strategies Considering the Consumers’ Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Song, Yang & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Rubin, Ofir, 2023. "Incentivizing green technology innovation to confront sustainable development," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Fang, Lei & Zhao, Sai, 2023. "On the green subsidies in a differentiated market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    12. Kuo Zhou & Baicheng Zhou & Mengmeng Yu, 2020. "The impacts of fiscal decentralization on environmental innovation in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 1690-1710, December.
    13. Xu, Le & Yang, Lili & Li, Ding & Shao, Shuai, 2023. "Asymmetric effects of heterogeneous environmental standards on green technology innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju, 2021. "Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Zheming Yan & Rui Shi & Zhiming Yang, 2018. "ICT Development and Sustainable Energy Consumption: A Perspective of Energy Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Huaide Wen & Jun Dai, 2021. "Green Technological Progress and the Backwardness Advantage of Green Development: Taking the Sustainable Development Strategy of Central and Western China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Yong Liu & Wenwen Ren & Qian Xu & Zhi-yang Liu, 2022. "Decision analysis of supply chains considering corporate social responsibility and government subsidy under different channel power structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1841-1869, August.
    18. Hong Zhang & Paul Georgescu, 2022. "Sustainable Organic Farming, Food Safety and Pest Management: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Fakheri, Sajjad & Bahrami-Bidoni, Zeynab & Makui, Ahmad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto DR., 2022. "A sustainable competitive supply chain network design for a green product under uncertainty: A case study of Iranian leather industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Jinjin Liu & Hua Ke & Yuan Gao, 2022. "Manufacturer’s R &D cooperation contract: linear fee or revenue-sharing payment in a low-carbon supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 323-355, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:2:p:960-977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.