IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1695-1707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do family health conversations impact patients with glioblastoma multiforme and their family members?

Author

Listed:
  • Inge Faarup
  • Jørgen T. Lauridsen
  • Karin Lütgen
  • Anni Nørregaard
  • Frantz Rom Poulsen
  • Birte Østergaard

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the impact of family health conversations (FamHC) as a supplement to conventional care on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), family functioning (FFSS) and family hardiness or resilience (FHI) 4 and 14 weeks postoperatively among patients with glioblastoma multiforme and their family members. Background There is a lack of knowledge about the efficiency of FamHC among families experiencing glioblastoma multiforme. Design A quasi‐experimental pre‐ and post‐test design adhering to the STROBE (Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines for case–control studies. Patients and family members were included consecutively in the pretest period from November 2013–December 2014 for the control group (offered traditional care only), and in the post‐test period from January 2015–December 2015 for the intervention group (offered traditional care and FamHC). For both groups, 4 and 14 weeks postoperative measurement were obtained. Methods Differences in outcomes were assessed using a difference‐in‐difference regression analysis approach measuring difference across pre and post groups and across 4 and 14 weeks measurements. Results The study does not reveal significant effects of FamHC (all p‐values larger than 0.05) as measured by the three instruments WHOQOL‐BREF, FFSS and FHI. Conclusions The present study was not able to show significant effects of FamHC. However, it cannot be left out that the intervention might be helpful and supportive at a later state of the illness trajectory. Relevance for clinical practice The study adds to the growing evidence‐based knowledge on FamHC by questioning their potential use in different cultural contexts among families experiencing critical illness. Oncological nurses need to adapt this information to support their daily care for the patients and their close relatives. For future studies, it is recommended that the families themselves choose when the conversations should take place during the course of the illness.

Suggested Citation

  • Inge Faarup & Jørgen T. Lauridsen & Karin Lütgen & Anni Nørregaard & Frantz Rom Poulsen & Birte Østergaard, 2019. "Do family health conversations impact patients with glioblastoma multiforme and their family members?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1695-1707, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1695-1707
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14777
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Abadie, 2005. "Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(1), pages 1-19.
    2. Carina Persson & Eva Benzein, 2014. "Family Health Conversations: How Do They Support Health?," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1695-1707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.