IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnljam/v2014y2014i1n612018.html

Fair Optimization and Networks: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Wlodzimierz Ogryczak
  • Hanan Luss
  • Michał Pióro
  • Dritan Nace
  • Artur Tomaszewski

Abstract

Optimization models related to designing and operating complex systems are mainly focused on some efficiency metrics such as response time, queue length, throughput, and cost. However, in systems which serve many entities there is also a need for respecting fairness: each system entity ought to be provided with an adequate share of the system’s services. Still, due to system operations‐dependant constraints, fair treatment of the entities does not directly imply that each of them is assigned equal amount of the services. That leads to concepts of fair optimization expressed by the equitable models that represent inequality averse optimization rather than strict inequality minimization; a particular widely applied example of that concept is the so‐called lexicographic maximin optimization (max‐min fairness). The fair optimization methodology delivers a variety of techniques to generate fair and efficient solutions. This paper reviews fair optimization models and methods applied to systems that are based on some kind of network of connections and dependencies, especially, fair optimization methods for the location problems and for the resource allocation problems in communication networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Wlodzimierz Ogryczak & Hanan Luss & Michał Pióro & Dritan Nace & Artur Tomaszewski, 2014. "Fair Optimization and Networks: A Survey," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:n:612018
    DOI: 10.1155/2014/612018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/612018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2014/612018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jos A. M. Potters & Stef H. Tijs, 1992. "The Nucleolus of a Matrix Game and Other Nucleoli," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 164-174, February.
    2. Lisa M. Betts & J. Randall Brown & Hanan Luss, 1994. "Minimax resource allocation problems with ordering constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(6), pages 719-738, October.
    3. Yager, Ronald R., 1997. "On the analytic representation of the Leximin ordering and its application to flexible constraint propagation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 176-192, October.
    4. Pang, Jong-Shi & Chang-Sung, Yu, 1989. "A min-max resource allocation problem with substitutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 218-223, July.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni, 2011. "An Integer Optimization Approach to Large-Scale Air Traffic Flow Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 211-227, February.
    6. Marsh, Michael T. & Schilling, David A., 1994. "Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Rachelle S. Klein & Hanan Luss & Uriel G. Rothblum, 1993. "Minimax Resource Allocation Problems with Resource-Substitutions Represented by Graphs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 959-971, October.
    8. Alois Behringer, Fred, 1981. "A simplex based algorithm for the lexicographically extended linear maxmin problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 274-283, July.
    9. W Ogryczak, 2001. "On goal programming formulations of the reference point method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(6), pages 691-698, June.
    10. Potters, J.A.M. & Tijs, S.H., 1992. "The nucleolus of a matrix game and other nucleoli," Other publications TiSEM ae3402e7-bd19-494b-b0a1-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. James Konow, 2003. "Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1188-1239, December.
    12. Sen, Amartya, 1973. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198281931.
    13. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    14. Quynh C. Nguyen & Richard E. Stone, 1993. "A Multiperiod Minimax Resource Allocation Problem with Substitutable Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(8), pages 964-974, August.
    15. Konow, James, 1996. "A positive theory of economic fairness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 13-35, October.
    16. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Studzinski, Krzysztof & Zorychta, Krystian, 1989. "A solver for the multi-objective transshipment problem with facility location," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 53-64, November.
    17. Klein, Rachelle S. & Luss, Hanan & Rothblum, Uriel G., 1995. "Multiperiod allocation of substitutable resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 488-503, September.
    18. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    19. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    20. Dritan Nace & James B. Orlin, 2007. "Lexicographically Minimum and Maximum Load Linear Programming Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 182-187, February.
    21. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz, 1997. "On the lexicographic minimax approach to location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 566-585, August.
    22. Rachelle S. Klein & Hanan Luss, 1991. "Minimax Resource Allocation with Tree Structured Substitutable Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 285-295, April.
    23. Marchi, Ezio & Oviedo, Jorge A., 1992. "Lexicographic optimality in the multiple objective linear programming: The nucleolar solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 355-359, March.
    24. Rothschild, Michael & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1973. "Some further results on the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 188-204, April.
    25. Wieslaw Kubiak, 2009. "Proportional Optimization and Fairness," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-87719-8, May.
    26. J Malczewski & W Ogryczak, 1995. "The Multiple Criteria Location Problem: 1. A Generalized Network Model and the Set of Efficient Solutions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(12), pages 1931-1960, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arslan, Okan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2025. "The 15-minute city concept: An operations research perspective and a research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Yanmeng Tao & Bo Jiang & Qixiu Cheng & Shuaian Wang, 2025. "A Quadratic Programming Model for Fair Resource Allocation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Hamoud Sultan Bin Obaid & Yasser Adel Almoghathawi & Mohammed Algafri, 2025. "Max-Min Fair Restoration of Infrastructure Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    2. Kostreva, Michael M. & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Wierzbicki, Adam, 2004. "Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 362-377, October.
    3. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz, 1997. "On the lexicographic minimax approach to location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 566-585, August.
    4. Klein, Rachelle S. & Luss, Hanan & Rothblum, Uriel G., 1995. "Multiperiod allocation of substitutable resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 488-503, September.
    5. Erkut, Erhan & Karagiannidis, Avraam & Perkoulidis, George & Tjandra, Stevanus A., 2008. "A multicriteria facility location model for municipal solid waste management in North Greece," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1402-1421, June.
    6. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    7. Wlodzimierz Ogryczak & Hanan Luss & Dritan Nace & Michał Pióro, 2014. "Fair Optimization and Networks: Models, Algorithms, and Applications," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
    8. Fromen, Bastian, 1997. "Reducing the number of linear programs needed for solving the nucleolus problem of n-person game theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 626-636, May.
    9. Zhang Jiangao & Shitao Yang, 2016. "On the Lexicographic Centre of Multiple Objective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 600-614, February.
    10. Włodzimierz Ogryczak, 2009. "Inequality measures and equitable locations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 61-86, March.
    11. Letsios, Dimitrios & Mistry, Miten & Misener, Ruth, 2021. "Exact lexicographic scheduling and approximate rescheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 469-478.
    12. Theodore Koutmeridis, 2013. "The Market for "Rough Diamonds": Information, Finance and Wage Inequality," CDMA Working Paper Series 201307, Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis, revised 14 Oct 2013.
    13. Nanak Kakwani & Marcelo Neri & Hyun H. Son, 2006. "Linkages between Pro-Poor Growth, Social Programmes and Labour Market: The Recent Brazilian Experience," Working Papers 26, International Policy Centre.
    14. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2002. "New perspectives on public finance: recent achievements and future challenges," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 341-360, December.
    15. Zsófia Dornai & Miklós Pintér, 2025. "Characterizations of the $$\textbf{u}$$ u -prenucleolus by dually- $$\textbf{u}$$ u -essential coalitions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(3), pages 1575-1607, June.
    16. Kakwani, Nanak & Neri, Marcelo Côrtes & Son, Hyun H., 2010. "Linkages Between Pro-Poor Growth, Social Programs and Labor Market: The Recent Brazilian Experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 881-894, June.
    17. Ľuboš Buzna & Michal Koháni & Jaroslav Janáček, 2014. "An Approximation Algorithm for the Facility Location Problem with Lexicographic Minimax Objective," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
    18. A. Estévez-Fernández & M.G. Fiestras-Janeiro, 2004. "On Properties of Several Refinements of Optimal Solutions in Linear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 41-62, July.
    19. Tamás Solymosi, 2019. "Weighted nucleoli and dually essential coalitions (extended version)," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 1914, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    20. Nicolas Gravel & Patrick Moyes, 2013. "Utilitarianism or welfarism: does it make a difference?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 529-551, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:n:612018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4185 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.