IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v36y2024i2p1570-1592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of the relationship between rental housing and adoption of self‐generating energy sources in Brazil using matching methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Laura Victória Marques
  • Daniel de Abreu Pereira Uhr
  • Bruno Benevit
  • Júlia Gallego Ziero Uhr

Abstract

We examine the effect of household tenure choice on adopting self‐generation energy technologies in Brazil. We employ microdata from the Household Budget Survey (POF) dataset for 2017 and 2018 from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and matching methodology to evaluate various hypotheses regarding occupancy status, credit availability, purchasing power and life cycle theory. We also use placebo treatments, propensity score weighting, entropy balancing and Rosenbaum's sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of our findings. Results show that leasing a residence negatively and significantly affects families' adoption of self‐generating technologies with an estimated probability reduction of around 62%, with greater effects when considering credit, wages and life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Laura Victória Marques & Daniel de Abreu Pereira Uhr & Bruno Benevit & Júlia Gallego Ziero Uhr, 2024. "An analysis of the relationship between rental housing and adoption of self‐generating energy sources in Brazil using matching methodology," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1570-1592, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:1570-1592
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.3876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.3876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    2. Charlier, Dorothée, 2015. "Energy efficiency investments in the context of split incentives among French households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 465-479.
    3. Zander, Kerstin K., 2020. "Unrealised opportunities for residential solar panels in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Marco Caliendo & Sabine Kopeinig, 2008. "Some Practical Guidance For The Implementation Of Propensity Score Matching," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 31-72, February.
    5. Halleck Vega, Solmaria & van Leeuwen, Eveline & van Twillert, Nienke, 2022. "Uptake of residential energy efficiency measures and renewable energy: Do spatial factors matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Bird, Stephen & Hernández, Diana, 2012. "Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 506-514.
    7. Sanya Carley & Tom P. Evans & Michelle Graff & David M. Konisky, 2018. "A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 621-627, August.
    8. Lukanov, Boris R. & Krieger, Elena M., 2019. "Distributed solar and environmental justice: Exploring the demographic and socio-economic trends of residential PV adoption in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Melvin, Jesse, 2018. "The split incentives energy efficiency problem: Evidence of underinvestment by landlords," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 342-352.
    10. King, Gary & Nielsen, Richard, 2019. "Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 435-454, October.
    11. Dorothée Charlier, 2015. "Energy-efficiency investments in the context of split incentives among French households," Post-Print hal-03062649, HAL.
    12. van Middelkoop, Manon & Vringer, Kees & Visser, Hans, 2017. "Are Dutch residents ready for a more stringent policy to enhance the energy performance of their homes?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 269-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Best, Rohan & Burke, Paul J., 2022. "Effects of renting on household energy expenditure: Evidence from Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Petrov, Ivan & Ryan, Lisa, 2021. "The landlord-tenant problem and energy efficiency in the residential rental market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Hammerle, Mara & White, Lee V. & Sturmberg, Bjorn, 2023. "Solar for renters: Investigating investor perspectives of barriers and policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Dodd, Tracey & Nelson, Tim, 2022. "Australian household adoption of solar photovoltaics: A comparative study of hardship and non-hardship customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Lang, Ghislaine & Lanz, Bruno, 2021. "Energy efficiency, information, and the acceptability of rent increases: A survey experiment with tenants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Esplin, Ryan & Nelson, Tim, 2022. "Redirecting solar feed in tariffs to residential battery storage: Would it be worth it?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 373-389.
    7. Seonho Shin, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of the Matching Grant Program for Refugees: An Observational Study Using Matching, Weighting, and the Mantel-Haenszel Test," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 103-133, March.
    8. Elizabeth Hewitt & Yiyi Wang, 2020. "Understanding the Drivers of National-Level Energy Audit Behavior: Demographics and Socioeconomic Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Fukui Hideki, 2023. "Evaluating Different Covariate Balancing Methods: A Monte Carlo Simulation," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 205-326, June.
    10. Sandrine Meyer & Laurence Holzemer & Thiago Nyssens Moraes Da Silva & Kevin Maréchal, 2016. "Things are not always what it is measured: On the importance of adequately assessing energy poverty," Working Papers CEB 16-025, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Sibylle Braungardt & Veit Bürger & Benjamin Köhler, 2021. "Carbon Pricing and Complementary Policies—Consistency of the Policy Mix for Decarbonizing Buildings in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Bensch, Gunther & Kluve, Jochen & Stöterau, Jonathan, 2021. "The market-based dissemination of energy-access technologies as a business model for rural entrepreneurs: Evidence from Kenya," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Curtis, John & Brazil, William & Harold, Jason, 2019. "Understanding preference heterogeneity in electricity services: the case of domestic appliance curtailment contracts," Papers WP638, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    14. Heffernan, Troy William & Daly, Matthew & Heffernan, Emma Elizabeth & Reynolds, Nina, 2021. "The carrot and the stick: Policy pathways to an environmentally sustainable rental housing sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    15. Hector H. Sandoval & Pedro I. Hancevic, 2023. "Split Incentives in Emerging Countries," Working Papers 242, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    16. Singhal, Puja & Sommer, Stephan & Kaestner, Kathrin & Pahle, Michael, 2023. "Split-incentives in energy efficiency investments? Evidence from rental housing," Ruhr Economic Papers 992, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Ahlrichs, Jakob & Rockstuhl, Sebastian, 2022. "Estimating fair rent increases after building retrofits: A max-min fairness approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Takahashi, Ryo, 2021. "How to stimulate environmentally friendly consumption: Evidence from a nationwide social experiment in Japan to promote eco-friendly coffee," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Camboni, Riccardo & Corsini, Alberto & Miniaci, Raffaele & Valbonesi, Paola, 2021. "Mapping fuel poverty risk at the municipal level. A small-scale analysis of Italian Energy Performance Certificate, census and survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Mazumder, Sharif & Rao, Ramesh, 2023. "Social trust and the choice between bank debt and public debt: Evidence from international data," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:1570-1592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.