IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i9p1614-1647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influenza Vaccination and Occupational Social Intensity: Evidence From U.S. Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Yancheng Xiao
  • Matthew Harris
  • Alissa O'Halloran
  • Jamison Pike

Abstract

We examine whether individuals with socially intensive occupations are empirically more likely to get vaccinated against flu. Socially active workers interact with a relatively large number of people and are therefore more likely to catch and spread infectious diseases. Vaccinating these workers against infectious disease therefore yields greater marginal social benefits than the average person. We construct multiple measures of social intensity from the Occupational Information Network. We find that workers in occupations with high social intensity are not significantly more likely to receive a flu shot. These results add to earlier findings that individuals' vaccination decisions are driven mainly by private valuations rather than social considerations. However, we provide the first direct evidence that individuals for whom vaccination would yield the greatest external benefits are not more likely to get vaccinated.

Suggested Citation

  • Yancheng Xiao & Matthew Harris & Alissa O'Halloran & Jamison Pike, 2025. "Influenza Vaccination and Occupational Social Intensity: Evidence From U.S. Workers," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(9), pages 1614-1647, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:9:p:1614-1647
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4974
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:9:p:1614-1647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.