IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/crtinf/v6y2025i1ne12031.html

Efficiency and consumer welfare under retail electricity deregulation: Analysis of Ohio's retail choice markets

Author

Listed:
  • Noah Dormady
  • William Welch
  • Yufan Ji
  • Stephanie Pedron
  • Abdollah Shafieezadeh
  • Alberto Lamadrid
  • Matthew Hoyt
  • Samantha Fox

Abstract

Many critical infrastructure services operate under either price regulation or deregulated systems. The grand policy experiment of deregulation has been heavily studied, but evaluations have been limited at the retail level where end‐user prices are often difficult to obtain. This paper presents an in‐depth look at the retail market for electricity in a retail deregulated, or restructured, market—Ohio. We build and introduce a comprehensive SQL database of every daily filed retail electricity offer over a 9‐year period of study, over two‐million records. We integrate this data with other external data sources and conduct a detailed descriptive analysis of market prices as observed by end consumers at the retail level. We find that the lion's share of “competitive” retail electricity choice offers are more costly to consumers than the utility's default service rate and have higher markups over the wholesale price, and we find that when prices exceed the default rate they do so by a considerably larger margin than when consumers observe savings. We also find that even well‐informed consumers are able to find a welfare‐improving rate relative to the default rate between only 43% and 59% of the time. We conclude with a discussion of implications and root economic causes of the efficiency and consumer welfare problems we observe. 许多关键基础设施服务要么在价格管制下运行,要么在“去管制”系统中运行。大量研究聚焦于去管制的大型政策实验,但在零售层面的评估却很有限,因为终端用户的价格通常难以获得。本文深度研究了俄亥俄州零售去管制或重组市场中的电力零售市场。我们建立并引入了一个综合SQL数据库,其中包含九年研究期间每日提交的所有零售电力报价;超过两百万条记录。我们将这些数据与其他外部数据源整合在一起,并对零售层面终端消费者观察到的市场价格进行详细的描述性分析。我们发现,比起公用事业的默认服务费率,大部分“竞争性”零售电力报价对消费者来说更为昂贵,并且比批发价格有更高的加价。我们还发现,当价格超过默认费率时,其幅度比消费者观察到的节省幅度要大得多。即使是消息灵通的消费者也只能在43%到59%的时间里找到相对于默认费率的福利改善费率。最后,我们讨论了研究启示,效率的根本经济原因、以及所观察到的消费者福利问题。 Muchos servicios de infraestructura críticos funcionan bajo regulación de precios o en sistemas desregulados. El gran experimento de política de desregulación ha sido ampliamente estudiado, pero las evaluaciones han sido limitadas en el nivel minorista, donde los precios para el usuario final suelen ser difíciles de obtener. Este documento presenta una mirada en profundidad al mercado minorista de electricidad en un mercado minorista desregulado o reestructurado, Ohio. Creamos e introducimos una base de datos SQL integral para cada oferta de electricidad minorista presentada diariamente durante un período de estudio de nueve años; más de dos millones de registros. Integramos estos datos con otras fuentes de datos externas y realizamos un análisis descriptivo detallado de los precios de mercado observados por los consumidores finales en el nivel minorista. Observamos que la mayor parte de las ofertas de electricidad minoristas “competitivas” son más costosas para los consumidores que la tarifa de servicio predeterminada de la empresa de servicios públicos y tienen márgenes más altos que el precio mayorista, y descubrimos que cuando los precios superan la tarifa predeterminada lo hacen por un margen considerablemente mayor que cuando los consumidores observan ahorros. También constatamos que incluso los consumidores bien informados son capaces de encontrar una tasa de mejora del bienestar en relación con la tasa de incumplimiento sólo entre el 43 y el 59 por ciento de las veces. Concluimos con un análisis de las implicaciones y las causas económicas fundamentales de los problemas de eficiencia y bienestar del consumidor que observamos.

Suggested Citation

  • Noah Dormady & William Welch & Yufan Ji & Stephanie Pedron & Abdollah Shafieezadeh & Alberto Lamadrid & Matthew Hoyt & Samantha Fox, 2025. "Efficiency and consumer welfare under retail electricity deregulation: Analysis of Ohio's retail choice markets," Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:crtinf:v:6:y:2025:i:1:n:e12031
    DOI: 10.1002/jci3.12031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jci3.12031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jci3.12031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bowen, William M. & Hill, Edward (Ned) & Thomas, Andrew & Liu, Ruoran & Henning, Mark, 2023. "Consumer price effects of deregulated electric generation markets: The case of Ohio and the midwestern United States," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Esplin, Ryan & Davis, Ben & Rai, Alan & Nelson, Tim, 2020. "The impacts of price regulation on price dispersion in Australia's retail electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Tsai, Chen-Hao & Tsai, Yi-Lin, 2018. "Competitive retail electricity market under continuous price regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 274-287.
    4. Amenta, Carlo & Aronica, Martina & Stagnaro, Carlo, 2022. "Is more competition better? Retail electricity prices and switching rates in the European Union," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Paul L. Joskow, 1972. "The Determination of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory Hearing," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 3(2), pages 632-644, Autumn.
    6. Ndebele, Tom & Marsh, Dan & Scarpa, Riccardo, 2019. "Consumer switching in retail electricity markets: Is price all that matters?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 88-103.
    7. Loi, Tian Sheng Allan & Jindal, Gautam, 2019. "Electricity market deregulation in Singapore – Initial assessment of wholesale prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Kristin D. Phillips, 2023. "Southern politics, southern power prices: Race, utility regulation, and the value of energy," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 197-212, June.
    9. Xuejuan Su, 2015. "Have customers benefited from electricity retail competition?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 146-182, April.
    10. Hartley, Peter R. & Medlock, Kenneth B. & Jankovska, Olivera, 2019. "Electricity reform and retail pricing in Texas," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-11.
    11. David P Byrne & Leslie A Martin & Jia Sheen Nah, 2022. "Price Discrimination by Negotiation: a Field Experiment in Retail Electricity [“Redistribution through Markets,”]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 137(4), pages 2499-2537.
    12. Brown, David P. & Eckert, Andrew, 2018. "The effect of default rates on retail competition and pricing decisions of competitive retailers: The case of Alberta," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 298-311.
    13. Alfred E. Kahn, 1988. "The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262610523, December.
    14. Gamble, Amelie & Juliusson, E. Asgeir & Gärling, Tommy, 2009. "Consumer attitudes towards switching supplier in three deregulated markets," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 814-819, October.
    15. Correa-Giraldo, Manuel & Garcia-Rendon, John J. & Perez, Alex, 2021. "Strategic behaviors and transfer of wholesale costs to retail prices in the electricity market: Evidence from Colombia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Yang, Yingkui, 2014. "Understanding household switching behavior in the retail electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 406-414.
    17. Lee, Boon L. & Wilson, Clevo & Simshauser, Paul & Majiwa, Eucabeth, 2021. "Deregulation, efficiency and policy determination: An analysis of Australia's electricity distribution sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Steven L. Puller & Jeremy West, 2013. "Efficient Retail Pricing in Electricity and Natural Gas Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 350-355, May.
    19. Ali Hortaçsu & Seyed Ali Madanizadeh & Steven L. Puller, 2017. "Power to Choose? An Analysis of Consumer Inertia in the Residential Electricity Market," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 192-226, November.
    20. McCrary, Justin, 2008. "Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 698-714, February.
    21. Simshauser, Paul, 2018. "Price discrimination and the modes of failure in deregulated retail electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 54-70.
    22. Simeone, Christina E. & Lange, Ian & Gilbert, Ben, 2023. "Pass-through in residential retail electricity competition: Evidence from Pennsylvania," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    23. Heloísa P. Burin & Julio S. M. Siluk & Graciele Rediske & Carmen B. Rosa, 2020. "Determining Factors and Scenarios of Influence on Consumer Migration from the Regulated Market to the Deregulated Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    24. Thomasi, Virginia & Siluk, Julio Cezar M. & Rigo, Paula D. & Pappis, Cesar Augusto de O., 2024. "Challenges, improvements, and opportunities market with the liberalization of the residential electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    25. Dormady, Noah & Jiang, Zhongnan & Hoyt, Matthew, 2019. "Do markets make good commissioners?: A quasi-experimental analysis of retail electric restructuring in Ohio – ERRATUM," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 517-519, September.
    26. Fontana, Magda & Iori, Martina & Nava, Consuelo Rubina, 2019. "Switching behavior in the Italian electricity retail market: Logistic and mixed effect Bayesian estimations of consumer choice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 339-351.
    27. Dormady, Noah & Roa-Henriquez, Alfredo & Rose, Adam, 2019. "Economic resilience of the firm: A production theory approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 446-460.
    28. Dormady, Noah & Jiang, Zhongnan & Hoyt, Matthew, 2019. "Do markets make good commissioners?: A quasi-experimental analysis of retail electric restructuring in Ohio," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 483-515, September.
    29. Monica Giulietti & Catherine Waddams Price & Michael Waterson, 2005. "Consumer Choice and Competition Policy: a Study of UK Energy Markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 115(506), pages 949-968, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Defeuilley, Christophe, 2025. "Retail electricity markets in Europe: Taking stock, looking ahead," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dormady, Noah & Roa-Henriquez, Alfredo & Hoyt, Matthew & Pesavento, Matthew & Koenig, Grace & Welch, William & Li, Zejun, 2025. "How are retail prices formed in restructured electricity markets?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Thomasi, Virginia & Siluk, Julio Cezar M. & Rigo, Paula D. & Pappis, Cesar Augusto de O., 2024. "Challenges, improvements, and opportunities market with the liberalization of the residential electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Simone Di Leo & Marta Chicca & Cinzia Daraio & Andrea Guerrini & Stefano Scarcella, 2022. "A Framework for the Analysis of the Sustainability of the Energy Retail Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Erdogan, Murside Rabia & Camgoz, Selin Metin & Karan, Mehmet Baha & Berument, M. Hakan, 2022. "The switching behavior of large-scale electricity consumers in The Turkish electricity retail market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Esplin, Ryan & Best, Rohan & Scranton, Jessica & Chai, Andreas, 2022. "Who pays the loyalty tax? The relationship between socioeconomic status and switching in Australia's retail electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Amenta, Carlo & Aronica, Martina & Stagnaro, Carlo, 2022. "Is more competition better? Retail electricity prices and switching rates in the European Union," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Massimo Dragotto & Marco Magnani & Paola Valbonesi, 2021. "Consumer inertia and firm incumbency in liberalised retail electricity markets: an empirical investigation," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0277, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    8. Hester M. Huisman & Evert de Haan & Machiel Mulder & Jaap E. Wieringa, 2026. "The impact of energy retailers’ loyalty programmes on the effectiveness of regulation of retail energy markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Guo, Yiang & Olmstead, Derek E.H. & Wilkins, Andrew H., 2025. "What drives consumers to switch retailers? Evidence from the Alberta electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Shin, Kong Joo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Liberalization of a retail electricity market: Consumer satisfaction and household switching behavior in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 675-685.
    11. Marco Magnani & Fabio M. Manenti & Paola Valbonesi, 2024. "Measuring Switching Costs in the Italian Residential Electricity Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(2), pages 189-208, March.
    12. Zarnikau, J. & Cao, K.H. & Qi, H.S. & Woo, C.K., 2023. "Has retail competition reduced residential electricity prices in Texas?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Esplin, Ryan & Davis, Ben & Rai, Alan & Nelson, Tim, 2020. "The impacts of price regulation on price dispersion in Australia's retail electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Huisman, Hester M. & de Haan, Evert & Mulder, Machiel & Wieringa, Jaap E., 2024. "The combined effect of regulators’ and retailers’ actions to stimulate consumer participation in retail energy markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Yongxiu He & Meiyan Wang & Fengtao Guang, 2019. "Applicability Evaluation of China’s Retail Electricity Price Package Combining Data Envelopment Analysis and a Cloud Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Defeuilley, Christophe, 2025. "Retail electricity markets in Europe: Taking stock, looking ahead," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Ndebele, Tom & Marsh, Dan & Scarpa, Riccardo, 2019. "Consumer switching in retail electricity markets: Is price all that matters?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 88-103.
    18. Daglish, Toby, 2015. "Consumer Governance in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 4183, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    19. Nogata, Daisuke, 2022. "Determinants of household switching between natural gas suppliers: Evidence from Japan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Muyi Yang & Yuanying Chi & Kristy Mamaril & Adam Berry & Xunpeng Shi & Liming Zhu, 2020. "Communication-Based Approach for Promoting Energy Consumer Switching: Some Evidence from Ofgem’s Database Trials in the United Kingdom," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:crtinf:v:6:y:2025:i:1:n:e12031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2693-3101 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.