IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n3374489.html

Prediction of Banks Efficiency Using Feature Selection Method: Comparison between Selected Machine Learning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Hamzeh F. Assous

Abstract

This study aims to examine the main determinants of efficiency of both conventional and Islamic Saudi banks and then choose the best fit model among machine learning prediction models (i.e., support vector machine (SVM), Chi‐squared automatic interaction detector (Chaid), linear regression, and neural network (NN)). The data were collected from the annual financial reports of Saudi banks from 2014 to 2018. The Saudi banking sector consists of 11 banks, 4 of which are Islamic. In this study, the major financial ratios are subgrouped into the profitability ratios, managerial practices, asset and loans, capital adequacy ratios, and liquidity. First, regression analysis is implemented with efficiency ratio as a dependent variable and the proxies of banks’ profitability, liquidity, asset quality, management ratios, and capital adequacy ratios as independent variables. Next, the feature selection is applied for different prediction models. Subsequently, 4 prediction models (i.e., SVM, CHAID, linear regression, and a neural network) were developed to choose the best fit. The performance metrics have also been evaluated. Regression results exhibit that the efficiency of both conventional and Islamic banks is highly affected by profitability, liquidity, and managerial practices. Finally, we choose the best prediction model with the highest R2 in the training and the testing phases with/out feature selection that is the CHAID model. The best predictors of cost efficiency for Saudi banks are the capital ratios, namely, CAR total and CAR tier 1. Findings are theoretically and practically important to academics, investors, and policymakers. Policymakers can benefit from the novelty of this study in building an early warning system using the CHAID model to predict different financial distress scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamzeh F. Assous, 2022. "Prediction of Banks Efficiency Using Feature Selection Method: Comparison between Selected Machine Learning Models," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:3374489
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/3374489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3374489
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/3374489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le, Minh & Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Wilson, Clevo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "Net stable funding ratio and profit efficiency of commercial banks in the US," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 55-66.
    2. Zhujia Yin & Yantuan Yu & Jianhuan Huang, 2018. "Evaluation and evolution of bank efficiency considering heterogeneity technology: An empirical study from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Adel Bogari, 2020. "Corporate Governance Features and Efficiency: Evidence from the Saudi Arabian Banks," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-43, January.
    4. Safiullah, Md, 2020. "Bank governance and crisis-period efficiency: A multinational study on Islamic and conventional banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. repec:eme:mfppss:mf-10-2020-0529 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Wan Hakimah Wan Ibrahim & Abdul Ghafar Ismail, 2020. "Do Regulation, Maqasid Shariah And Institutional Parameter Improve Islamic Bank Efficiency?," Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, Bank Indonesia, vol. 6(1), pages 135-162, February.
    7. Wan Hakimah Wan Ibrahim & Abdul Ghafar Ismail, 2020. "Do Regulation, Maqasid Shariah And Institutional Parameter Improve Islamic Bank Efficiency?," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 6(1), pages 135-162.
    8. Chaffai, Mohamed, 2020. "Hyperbolic distance function, technical efficiency and stability to shocks: A comparison between Islamic banks and conventional banks in MENA region," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    9. Bitar, Mohammad & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Walker, Thomas, 2020. "Efficiency in Islamic vs. conventional banking: The role of capital and liquidity," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    10. Hussam Musa & Viacheslav Natorin & Zdenka Musova & Pavol Durana, 2020. "Comparison of the efficiency measurement of the conventional and Islamic banks," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(1), pages 29-58, March.
    11. Asima Siddique & Omar Masood & Kiran Javaria & Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, 2020. "A comparative study of performance of commercial banks in ASIAN developing and developed countries," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(2), pages 580-591, June.
    12. Ezzeddine Ben Mohamed & Neama Meshabet & Bilel Jarraya, 2021. "Determinants of technical efficiency of Islamic banks in GCC countries," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 218-238, February.
    13. Dania Al-Najjar, 2022. "The Co‐Movement between International and Emerging Stock Markets Using ANN and Stepwise Models: Evidence from Selected Indices," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    14. Dania AL-Najjar & Hamzeh F Assous, 2021. "Key determinants of deposits volume using CAMEL rating system: The case of Saudi banks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Abdulelah Alrashidi & Omar Alarfaj, 2020. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital Efficiency on Bank Risks: Empirical Evidence from the Saudi Banking Industry," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 10(4), pages 206-214.
    16. Song, Yu & Akagi, Fumio, 2016. "Application of artificial neural network for the prediction of stock market returns: The case of the Japanese stock marketAuthor-Name: Qiu, Mingyue," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-7.
    17. Eissa A. Al-Homaidi & Faozi A. Almaqtari & Ali T. Yahya & Amgad S.D. Khaled, 2020. "Internal and external determinants of listed commercial banks' profitability in India: dynamic GMM approach," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 34-67.
    18. Sanaa Belasri & Mathieu Gomes & Guillaume Pijourlet, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency," Post-Print hal-02434348, HAL.
    19. Dania Al-Najjar & Faheem Aslam, 2022. "The Co-Movement between International and Emerging Stock Markets Using ANN and Stepwise Models: Evidence from Selected Indices," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-14, March.
    20. Ahmad Al-Harbi, 2020. "Determinates of Islamic banks liquidity," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(8), pages 1619-1632, February.
    21. Faozi A. Almaqtari & Eissa A. Al‐Homaidi & Mosab I. Tabash & Najib H. Farhan, 2019. "The determinants of profitability of Indian commercial banks: A panel data approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 168-185, January.
    22. Belasri, Sanaa & Gomes, Mathieu & Pijourlet, Guillaume, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    23. Fungáčová, Zuzana & Klein, Paul-Olivier & Weill, Laurent, 2018. "Persistent and transient inefficiency: Explaining the low efficiency of Chinese big banks," BOFIT Discussion Papers 16/2018, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dania AL-Najjar & Hazem AL-Najjar & Nadia Al-Rousan & Hamzeh F. Assous, 2022. "Developing Machine Learning Techniques to Investigate the Impact of Air Quality Indices on Tadawul Exchange Index," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    2. Johnson Nsowah & Peter Kwarteng & Augustine Anane & Felix Kwabena Danso & George Agyenim-Boateng, 2025. "The effects of outsourcing on organisational performance: case study of selected financial institutions in Sunyani Municipality," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(11), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dania AL-Najjar, 2022. "Impact of the twin pandemics: COVID-19 and oil crash on Saudi exchange index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Dania AL-Najjar & Hamzeh F Assous, 2021. "Key determinants of deposits volume using CAMEL rating system: The case of Saudi banks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Issam Laguir & Rebecca Stekelorum & Lamia Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò, 2021. "Managing corporate social responsibility in the bank sector: A fuzzy and disaggregated approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1324-1334, July.
    4. Saeed Nosratabadi & Gergo Pinter & Amir Mosavi & Sandor Semperger, 2020. "Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models," Papers 2003.13423, arXiv.org.
    5. Khurshid Djalilov & Christopher A. Hartwell, 2023. "The spirit is willing, but the institutions are weak: disclosure of corporate social responsibility and the financial sector in transition," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 385-427, June.
    6. Xin Du & Ya Bu & Qian Zhang & Hui Li, 2026. "Fintech, Technology Spillover and TFP of Commercial Banks: Evidence From China," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 40-53, January.
    7. Qiong Xia & Jie Zhu & Fangqing Wei & Yingying Shao, 2026. "Reexamining the Efficiency of Chinese Commercial Banks Using a Novel Two‐Stage General Equilibrium Efficient Frontier DEA Approach With Fixed‐Sum Intermediate Measures," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 3098-3119, July.
    8. Tarazi, Amine & Abedifar, Pejman, 2022. "Special issue on Islamic banking: Stability and governance," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Jian Xu & Muhammad Haris & Muhammad Irfan, 2022. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Bank Profitability during COVID‐19: A Comparison with China and Pakistan," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    10. E. Jeroh, 2020. "Firms Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Nigeria," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(6), pages 727-743, June.
    11. Lien‐Wen Liang & Tsui‐Jung Lin & Meng‐Yun Chung, 2024. "The impact of ESG on the cost efficiency of commercial banks—Evidence from Western European commercial banks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(8), pages 5811-5824, December.
    12. Naheeda Ali, 2023. "Islamic Finance In The Context Of Maqasid’Shariah Under: Islamic Jurisprudences," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 12-18.
    13. Saeed Nosratabadi & Gergo Pinter & Amir Mosavi & Sandor Semperger, 2020. "Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Imad Bou-Hamad & Abdel Latef Anouze & Ibrahim H. Osman, 2022. "A cognitive analytics management framework to select input and output variables for data envelopment analysis modeling of performance efficiency of banks using random forest and entropy of information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 63-92, January.
    15. Maria Celia López-Penabad & Ana Iglesias-Casal & José Fernando Silva Neto & José Manuel Maside-Sanfiz, 2023. "Does corporate social performance improve bank efficiency? Evidence from European banks," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1399-1437, May.
    16. Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2024. "Navigating the trade‐off between corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of financing: Evidence from BRICS economies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 1927-1943, June.
    17. Yubin Zheng & Md. Harun Ur Rashid & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Wei Wei & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Firm’s Productivity: Evidence from the Banking Industry in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Nguyen, Thanh & Nghiem, Son & Bhati, Abhishek Singh, 2024. "Risk-adjusted efficiency and innovation: an examination of systematic difference and convergence among BRIC banks," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(1).
    19. Edgars Sedovs & Iveta Ludviga & Tatjana Volkova, 2025. "Sustainability Orientation Paradox: Do Banks Ensure Strategic Sustainable Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-32, July.
    20. Lassoued, Naima & Khanchel, Imen & Ghazouani, Zaineb, 2026. "East or west, experience is best: ESG, cost efficiency and CEO international background in MENA banks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:3374489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.