IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v21y2025i1ne70018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Madriaza
  • Ghayda Hassan
  • Sébastien Brouillette‐Alarie
  • Aoudou Njingouo Mounchingam
  • Loïc Durocher‐Corfa
  • Eugene Borokhovski
  • David Pickup
  • Sabrina Paillé

Abstract

The Problem People use social media platforms to chat, search, and share information, express their opinions, and connect with others. But these platforms also facilitate the posting of divisive, harmful, and hateful messages, targeting groups and individuals, based on their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or political views. Hate content is not only a problem on the Internet, but also on traditional media, especially in places where the Internet is not widely available or in rural areas. Despite growing awareness of the harms that exposure to hate can cause, especially to victims, there is no clear consensus in the literature on what specific impacts this exposure, as bystanders, produces on individuals, groups, and the population at large. Most of the existing research has focused on analyzing the content and the extent of the problem. More research in this area is needed to develop better intervention programs that are adapted to the current reality of hate. Objective The objective of this review is to synthesize the empirical evidence on how media exposure to hate affects or is associated with various outcomes for individuals and groups. Search Methods Searches covered the period up to December 2021 to assess the impact of exposure to hate. The searches were performed using search terms across 20 databases, 51 related websites, the Google search engine, as well as other systematic reviews and related papers. Selection Criteria This review included any correlational, experimental, and quasi‐experimental study that establishes an impact relationship and/or association between exposure to hate in online and traditional media and the resulting consequences on individuals or groups. Data Collection and Analysis Fifty‐five studies analyzing 101 effect sizes, classified into 43 different outcomes, were identified after the screening process. Initially, effect sizes were calculated based on the type of design and the statistics used in the studies, and then transformed into standardized mean differences. Each outcome was classified following an exhaustive review of the operational constructs present in the studies. These outcomes were grouped into five major dimensions: attitudinal changes, intergroup dynamics, interpersonal behaviors, political beliefs, and psychological effects. When two or more outcomes from the studies addressed the same construct, they were synthesized together. A separate meta‐analysis was conducted for each identified outcome from different samples. Additionally, experimental and quasi‐experimental studies were synthesized separately from correlational studies. Twenty‐four meta‐analyses were performed using a random effects model, and meta‐regressions and moderator analyses were conducted to explore factors influencing effect size estimates. Results The 55 studies included in this systematic review were published between 1996 and 2021, with most of them published since 2015. They include 25 correlational studies, and 22 randomized and 8 non‐randomized experimental studies. Most of these studies provide data extracted from individuals (e.g., self‐report); however, this review includes 6 studies that are based on quantitative analysis of comments or posts, or their relationship to specific geographic areas. Correlational studies encompass sample sizes ranging from 101 to 6829 participants, while experimental and quasi‐experimental studies involve participant numbers between 69 and 1112. In most cases, the exposure to hate content occurred online or within social media contexts (37 studies), while only 8 studies reported such exposure in traditional media platforms. In the remaining studies, the exposure to hate content was delivered through political propaganda, primarily associated with extreme right‐wing groups. No studies were removed from the systematic review due to quality assessment. In the experimental studies, participants demonstrated high adherence to the experimental conditions and thus contributed significantly to most of the results. The correlational and quasi‐experimental studies used consistent, valid, and reliable instruments to measure exposure and outcomes derived from well‐defined variables. As with the experimental studies, the results from the correlation and quasi‐experimental studies were complete. Meta‐analyses related to four dimensions were performed: Attitudinal changes, Intergroup dynamics, Interpersonal behaviors, and Psychological effects. We were unable to conduct a meta‐analysis for the “Political Beliefs” dimension due to an insufficient number of studies. In terms of attitude changes, exposure to hate leads to negative attitudes (dEx = 0.414; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.005, 0.824; p

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Madriaza & Ghayda Hassan & Sébastien Brouillette‐Alarie & Aoudou Njingouo Mounchingam & Loïc Durocher‐Corfa & Eugene Borokhovski & David Pickup & Sabrina Paillé, 2025. "Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:1:n:e70018
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.70018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.70018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Wachs & Michelle F. Wright & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Ritu Singh & Ramakrishna Biswal & Eun-mee Kim & Soeun Yang & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Carmen Almendros & Katerina Flora & Vassiliki Daskal, 2019. "Associations between Witnessing and Perpetrating Online Hate in Eight Countries: The Buffering Effects of Problem-Focused Coping," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Konrad Rudnicki & Heidi Vandebosch & Pierre Voué & Karolien Poels, 2023. "Systematic review of determinants and consequences of bystander interventions in online hate and cyberbullying among adults," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 527-544, April.
    3. Sue Duval & Richard Tweedie, 2000. "Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 455-463, June.
    4. María Antonia Paz & Julio Montero-Díaz & Alicia Moreno-Delgado, 2020. "Hate Speech: A Systematized Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    5. Steven Windisch & Susann Wiedlitzka & Ajima Olaghere & Elizabeth Jenaway, 2022. "Online interventions for reducing hate speech and cyberhate: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    6. Michael Wolfowicz & Yael Litmanovitz & David Weisburd & Badi Hasisi, 2021. "Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    7. Chavez, Leo R. & Campos, Belinda & Corona, Karina & Sanchez, Daina & Ruiz, Catherine Belyeu, 2019. "Words hurt: Political rhetoric, emotions/affect, and psychological well-being among Mexican-origin youth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 240-251.
    8. Lieven Pauwels & Nele Schils, 2016. "Differential Online Exposure to Extremist Content and Political Violence: Testing the Relative Strength of Social Learning and Competing Perspectives," Terrorism and Political Violence, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-29, January.
    9. Sebastian Wachs & Michelle F. Wright, 2018. "Associations between Bystanders and Perpetrators of Online Hate: The Moderating Role of Toxic Online Disinhibition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-9, September.
    10. Alice Tontodimamma & Eugenia Nissi & Annalina Sarra & Lara Fontanella, 2021. "Thirty years of research into hate speech: topics of interest and their evolution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 157-179, January.
    11. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303512_4 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0222194 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Atte Oksanen & Markus Kaakinen & Jaana Minkkinen & Pekka Räsänen & Bernard Enjolras & Kari Steen-Johnsen, 2020. "Perceived Societal Fear and Cyberhate after the November 2015 Paris Terrorist Attacks," Terrorism and Political Violence, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 1047-1066, July.
    14. Ghayda Hassan & Jihan Rabah & Pablo Madriaza & Sebastien Brouillette‐Alarie & Eugene Borokhovski & David Pickup & Wynnpaul Varela & Melina Girard & Loïc Durocher‐Corfa & Emmanuel Danis, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Hate online and in traditional media: A systematic review of the evidence for associations or impacts on individuals, audiences, and communities," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    15. Karsten Müller & Carlo Schwarz, 2021. "Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime [Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany]," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 2131-2167.
    16. Sarah L. Carthy & Colm B. Doody & Katie Cox & Denis O'Hora & Kiran M. Sarma, 2020. "Counter‐narratives for the prevention of violent radicalisation: A systematic review of targeted interventions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), September.
    17. Newman, Benjamin & Merolla, Jennifer L. & Shah, Sono & Lemi, Danielle Casarez & Collingwood, Loren & Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick, 2021. "The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 1138-1159, July.
    18. Sinnenberg, L. & Buttenheim, A.M. & Padrez, K. & Mancheno, C. & Ungar, L. & Merchant, R.M., 2017. "Twitter as a tool for health research: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(1), pages 1-8.
    19. Jimena Zapata & Justin Sulik & Clemens Wulffen & Ophelia Deroy, 2024. "Bystanders’ collective responses set the norm against hate speech," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Michael Wolfowicz & Badi Hasisi & David Weisburd, 2022. "What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Lewis & Sarah Marsden & Anna Stefaniak & James Hewitt, 2025. "PROTOCOL: Non‐criminal justice interventions for countering cognitive and behavioural radicalisation amongst children and adolescents: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), March.
    2. Michael Wolfowicz & Badi Hasisi & David Weisburd, 2022. "What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    3. Ghayda Hassan & Jihan Rabah & Pablo Madriaza & Sebastien Brouillette‐Alarie & Eugene Borokhovski & David Pickup & Wynnpaul Varela & Melina Girard & Loïc Durocher‐Corfa & Emmanuel Danis, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Hate online and in traditional media: A systematic review of the evidence for associations or impacts on individuals, audiences, and communities," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    4. Magdalena Celuch & Atte Oksanen & Pekka Räsänen & Matthew Costello & Catherine Blaya & Izabela Zych & Vicente J. Llorent & Ashley Reichelmann & James Hawdon, 2022. "Factors Associated with Online Hate Acceptance: A Cross-National Six-Country Study among Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Sebastian Wachs & Juan Manuel Machimbarrena & Michelle F. Wright & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Soeun Yang & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Ritu Singh & Ramakrishna Biswal & Katerina Flora & Vassiliki Daskalou & , 2022. "Associations between Coping Strategies and Cyberhate Involvement: Evidence from Adolescents across Three World Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Michael Wolfowicz & Badi Hasisi & David Weisburd, 2021. "PROTOCOL: What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    7. Carlos Arcila Calderón & Patricia Sánchez Holgado & Jesús Gómez & Marcos Barbosa & Haodong Qi & Alberto Matilla & Pilar Amado & Alejandro Guzmán & Daniel López-Matías & Tomás Fernández-Villazala, 2024. "From online hate speech to offline hate crime: the role of inflammatory language in forecasting violence against migrant and LGBT communities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Nigel Harriman & Neil Shortland & Max Su & Tyler Cote & Marcia A. Testa & Elena Savoia, 2020. "Youth Exposure to Hate in the Online Space: An Exploratory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Peter Neyroud & Ajmal Aziz & Brett Kubicek, 2024. "Update on Campbell's Countering Violent Extremism programme," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    10. Kiran M. Sarma & Sarah L. Carthy & Katie M. Cox, 2022. "Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    11. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0171654 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Qian Li & Yan Chen & Shikun Sun & Muyuan Zhu & Jing Xue & Zihan Gao & Jinfeng Zhao & Yihe Tang, 2022. "Research on Crop Irrigation Schedules Under Deficit Irrigation—A Meta-analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4799-4817, September.
    15. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Damiano Pizzol & Mike Trott & Igor Grabovac & Mario Antunes & Anna Claudia Colangelo & Simona Ippoliti & Cristian Petre Ilie & Anne Carrie & Nicola Veronese & Lee Smith, 2021. "Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Ünal, Zehra E. & Kartal, Gamze & Ulusoy, Serra & Ala, Aslı M. & Yilmaz, Munube & Geary, David C., 2023. "Relative contributions of g and basic domain-specific mathematics skills to complex mathematics competencies," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    19. Gundula Krack, 2019. "How to make value-based health insurance designs more effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 841-856, August.
    20. Endrich, Marek, 2020. "The good tourist, the bad refugee and the ugly German: Xenophobic activities and tourism," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224604, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    21. Campo, Francesco & Giunti, Sara & Mendola, Mariapia, 2024. "Refugee crisis and right-wing populism: Evidence from the Italian Dispersal Policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:1:n:e70018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.