IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v42y2026i2p473-485.html

ESG Decoupling and Innovation: Are China's Agri‐Food Companies Walking the Walk?

Author

Listed:
  • Yanyan Zhang
  • Tao Xiong

Abstract

Promoting sustainable, innovation‐driven growth is crucial for achieving high‐quality economic development in the new era. As a key indicator of companies' sustainability, ESG practices have gained significant attention. However, the lack of a unified ESG evaluation framework and standardized disclosure regulations has led some companies to exaggerate or misrepresent their ESG performance—an issue known as “ESG decoupling.” This study examines the impact of ESG decoupling on agri‐food companies' innovation, using panel data from 2011 to 2022. The results show that ESG decoupling undermines a company's credibility, hindering innovation. However, independent directors mitigate the negative effects of ESG decoupling on innovation. Further analysis reveals that the impact of ESG decoupling is less severe in companies with low digital transformation levels and state‐owned enterprises (SOEs). In contrast, the negative effects are more significant in large companies and the food industry. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the relationship between ESG decoupling and innovation. It offers empirical evidence and expands the theoretical framework linking ESG behavior with innovation. Ultimately, the study highlights the need for improved ESG disclosure systems and enhanced companies' credibility to foster a more innovation‐friendly environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanyan Zhang & Tao Xiong, 2026. "ESG Decoupling and Innovation: Are China's Agri‐Food Companies Walking the Walk?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 473-485, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:473-485
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.22059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.22059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.22059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:473-485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.